Abstract
“Selective abduction” is a notion coined by L. Magnani, who contrasts it with the more common notion of “creative abduction”. However, selective abduction may easily be confused with inference to the best explanation (IBE). This constitutes a problem, if IBE is reconstructed as an inductive inference. For on the one hand, abduction and induction must be distinct. On the other hand, Gabbay and Woods, but also Hintikka and Kapitan, even include hypothesis selection as part and parcel of the abductive inference per se. Consequently, there seems to be a riddle about what selective abduction clearly means and how it could be distinguished from other forms of reasoning. The contribution tries to solve this problem by explicating selective abduction and embedding it in an overall taxonomy of inferences.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adams, R. A., Shipp, S., & Friston, K. J. (2013). Predictions not commands: Active inference in the motor system. Brain Structure and Function, 218, 611–643.
Clark, A. (2012). Embodied, embedded, and extended cognition. In K. Frankish & W. M. Ramsey (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of cognitive science (pp. 275–291). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gabbay, D. M., & Woods, J. (2005). A practical logic of cognitive systems, Vol. 2: The reach of abduction—Insight and trial. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Hintikka, J. (1998). What is abduction? The fundamental problem of contemporary epistemology. Transactions the Charles S. Peirce Society, 34, 503–533.
Hintikka, J. (2007). Socratic epistemology: Explorations of knowledge-seeking by questioning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kapitan, T. (1997). Peirce and the structure of abductive inference. In N. Houser, D. D. Roberts, & J. V. Evra (Eds.), Studies in the logic of Charles Sanders Peirce (pp. 477–496). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Magnani, L. (2001). Abduction, reason, and science: Processes of discovery and explanation. New York: Kluwer.
Magnani, L. (2009). Abductive cognition: The epistemological and eco-cognitive dimensions of hypothetical reasoning. Berlin: Springer.
Minnameier, G. (2004). Peirce-Suit of truth: Why inference to the best explanation and abduction ought not to be confused. Erkenntnis, 60, 75–105.
Minnameier, G. (2016). Forms of abduction and an inferential taxonomy. In L. Magnani & T. Bertolotti (Eds.), Springer handbook of model-based reasoning. Berlin: Springer, (forthcoming).
Paavola, S. (2006). Hansonian and Harmanian abduction as models of discovery. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 20, 93–108.
Schurz, G. (2008). Patterns of abduction. Synthese, 164, 201–234.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Minnameier, G. (2016). Abduction, Selection, and Selective Abduction. In: Magnani, L., Casadio, C. (eds) Model-Based Reasoning in Science and Technology. Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics, vol 27. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38983-7_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38983-7_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-38982-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-38983-7
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)