Skip to main content

Tasters, Supertasters, Genes and Environment: How Dietary Choices Influence Our Health

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Human Nutrition from the Gastroenterologist’s Perspective

Abstract

Food choices are the result of many different influences. Environment, education, income but also family habits, beliefs or occupation are some of the factors influencing what we eat. Naturally, taste is one of the main determinants, providing information about food and preventing the ingestion of potentially harmful substances. Taste preferences have a strong innate component that can be modified by pre and postnatal experiences related to evolutionary adaptation to specific environments. Individuals may be classified into three different phenotypic categories: nontasters, medium tasters and supertasters. Data on the influence of genetic is still controversial and a deeper understanding of taste sense and flavour perception is central to preventing chronic degenerative diseases such as obesity that are strongly impacted by how much we like some foods and dislike others regulating their acceptability and modulating their intake.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Small DM, Prescott J (2005) Odor/taste integration and the perception of flavor. Exp Brain Res 166:345–357

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chaudhari N, Roper SD (2010) The cell biology of taste. J Cell Biol 190:285–296

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Besnard P, Passilly-Degrace P, Khan NA (2016) Taste of fat: a sixth taste modality? Physiol Rev 96:151–176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Schmidt RL, Lang F, Heckmann M (2011) Physiologie des Menschen: mit Pathophysiologie. Springer, Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Depoortere I (2014) Taste receptors of the gut: emerging roles in health and disease. Gut 63:179–190

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Purves DA, George J, Fitzpatrick D, Katz LC, LaMantia A-S, McNamara JO, Williams SM (2001) The organization of the taste system. Neuroscience, 2nd edn. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland

    Google Scholar 

  7. Blakeslee AF (1932) Genetics of sensory thresholds: taste for phenyl thio carbamide. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 18:120–130

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Blakeslee AF, Salmon TN (1935) Genetics of sensory thresholds: individual taste reactions for different substances. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 21:84–90

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Bartoshuk LM (1991) Sweetness – history, preference, and genetic-variability. Food Technol Chic 45:108

    Google Scholar 

  10. Herbert C, Platte P, Wiemer J, Macht M, Blumenthal TD (2014) Supertaster, super reactive: oral sensitivity for bitter taste modulates emotional approach and avoidance behavior in the affective startle paradigm. Physiol Behav 135:198–207

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bartoshuk LM, Duffy VB, Miller IJ (1994) Ptc/prop tasting – anatomy, psychophysics, and sex effects. Physiol Behav 56:1165–1171

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Miller IJ Jr, Reedy FE Jr (1990) Variations in human taste bud density and taste intensity perception. Physiol Behav 47:1213–1219

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Essick GK, Chopra A, Guest S, McGlone F (2003) Lingual tactile acuity, taste perception, and the density and diameter of fungiform papillae in female subjects. Physiol Behav 80:289–302

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bartoshuk LM (2000) Comparing sensory experiences across individuals: recent psychophysical advances illuminate genetic variation in taste perception. Chem Senses 25:447–460

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Prutkin J, Fisher EM, Etter L et al (2000) Genetic variation and inferences about perceived taste intensity in mice and men. Physiol Behav 69:161–173

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Feeney E, O’Brien S, Scannell A, Markey A, Gibney ER (2011) Genetic variation in taste perception: does it have a role in healthy eating? Proc Nutr Soc 70:135–143

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim UK, Jorgenson E, Coon H, Leppert M, Risch N, Drayna D (2003) Positional cloning of the human quantitative trait locus underlying taste sensitivity to phenylthiocarbamide. Science 299:1221–1225

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Duffy VB (2007) Variation in oral sensation: implications for diet and health. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 23:171–177

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Eldeghaidy S, Marciani L, McGlone F et al (2011) The cortical response to the oral perception of fat emulsions and the effect of taster status. J Neurophysiol 105:2572–2581

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Goldstein GL, Daun H, Tepper BJ (2005) Adiposity in middle-aged women is associated with genetic taste blindness to 6-n-propylthiouracil. Obes Res 13:1017–1023

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Catanzaro D, Chesbro EC, Velkey AJ (2013) Relationship between food preferences and PROP taster status of college students. Appetite 68:124–131

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Yackinous C, Guinard JX (2001) Relation between PROP taster status and fat perception, touch, and olfaction. Physiol Behav 72:427–437

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Yackinous CA, Guinard JX (2002) Relation between PROP (6-n-propylthiouracil) taster status, taste anatomy and dietary intake measures for young men and women. Appetite 38:201–209

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hedge AM, Sharma A (2008) Genetic sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) as a screening tool for obesity and dental caries in children. J Clin Pediatr Dent 33:107–111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Keller KL, Tepper BJ (2004) Inherited taste sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil in diet and body weight in children. Obes Res 12:904–912

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Beauchamp GK, Mennella JA (2009) Early flavor learning and its impact on later feeding behavior. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 48(Suppl 1):S25–S30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Beauchamp GK, Mennella JA (2011) Flavor perception in human infants: development and functional significance. Digestion 83(Suppl 1):1–6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Beauchamp GK, Mennella JA (1996) Early feeding and the acquisition of flavor preferences. Nestle Nutr Works Ser 36:163–177

    Google Scholar 

  29. Manz F, Manz I (2005) Sinnesentwicklung und Sinnesausprägung beim Föten und Säugling. In: v. Engelhardt D, Wild R. (Hg.): Geschmackskulturen. Vom Dialog der Sinne beim Essen und Trinken, Frankfurt/New York 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Tastes differ – how taste preferences develop. Available at http://www.eufic.org/article/en/artid/how-taste-preferences-develop/ Accessed January 2016.

  31. Haubrich S (2006) Einfluss von hypoallergener Säuglingsnahrung auf die Entwicklung von Geschmackspräferenzen. Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften Hamburg, Hamburg

    Google Scholar 

  32. Mennella JA, Johnson A, Beauchamp GK (1995) Garlic ingestion by pregnant-women alters the odor of amniotic-fluid. Chem Senses 20:207–209

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Mennella JA, Jagnow CP, Beauchamp GK (2001) Prenatal and postnatal flavor learning by human infants. Pediatrics 107:e88

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Schaal B, Marlier L, Soussignan R (2000) Human foetuses learn odours from their pregnant mother’s diet. Chem Senses 25:729–737

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Mela D (2001) Development and acquisition of food likes. In: Frewer LJ, Risvik E, Schifferstein H (eds) A European perspective of consumers’ food choices. Springer, Berlin, pp 9–21

    Google Scholar 

  36. Keskitalo K, Knaapila A, Kallela M et al (2007) Sweet taste preferences are partly genetically determined: identification of a trait locus on chromosome 16. Am J Clin Nutr 86:55–63

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Keskitalo K, Tuorila H, Spector TD et al (2007) Same genetic components underlie different measures of sweet taste preference. Am J Clin Nutr 86:1663–1669

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Mennella JA, Griffin CE, Beauchamp GK (2004) Flavor programming during infancy. Pediatrics 113:840–845

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Haller R, Rummel C, Henneberg S, Pollmer U, Koster EP (1999) The influence of early experience with vanillin on food preference later in life. Chem Senses 24:465–467

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Mennella JA, Pepino MY, Reed DR (2005) Genetic and environmental determinants of bitter perception and sweet preferences. Pediatrics 115:e216–e222

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Allegri C, Turconi G, Cena H (2011) Dietary attitudes and diseases of comfort. Eat Weight Disord-St 16:E226–E235

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Furst T, Connors M, Bisogni CA, Sobal J, Falk LW (1996) Food choice: a conceptual model of the process. Appetite 26:247–265

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Bellisari A (2008) Evolutionary origins of obesity. Obes Rev 9:165–180

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Hanson MD, Chen E (2007) Socioeconomic status and health behaviors in adolescence: a review of the literature. J Behav Med 30:263–285

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Reed DR, Tanaka T, McDaniel AH (2006) Diverse tastes: genetics of sweet and bitter perception. Physiol Behav 88:215–226

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Birch LL, Fisher JA (1995) Appetite and eating behavior in children. Pediatr Clin N Am 42:931–953

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Yeomans MR (2012) Flavour-nutrient learning in humans: an elusive phenomenon? Physiol Behav 106:345–355

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. de Wild VW, de Graaf C, Jager G (2013) Effectiveness of flavour nutrient learning and mere exposure as mechanisms to increase toddler’s intake and preference for green vegetables. Appetite 64:89–96

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Keller KL (2014) The use of repeated exposure and associative conditioning to increase vegetable acceptance in children: explaining the variability across studies. J Acad Nutr Diet 114:1169–1173

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Capaldi-Phillips ED, Wadhera D (2014) Associative conditioning can increase liking for and consumption of brussels sprouts in children aged 3 to 5 years. J Acad Nutr Diet 114:1236–1241

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Decastro JM (1994) Family and friends produce greater social facilitation of food-intake than other companions. Physiol Behav 56:445–455

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Popkin BM (2001) Nutrition in transition: the changing global nutrition challenge. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 10(Suppl):S13–S18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Popkin BM (2001) The nutrition transition and obesity in the developing world. J Nutr 131:871S–873S

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Drewnowski A, Kawachi I (2015) Diets and health: how food decisions are shaped by biology, economics, geography, and social interactions. Big Data 3:193–197

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Oftedal KN, Tepper BJ (2013) Influence of the PROP bitter taste phenotype and eating attitudes on energy intake and weight status in pre-adolescents: a 6-year follow-up study. Physiol Behav 118:103–111

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Keskitalo K, Tuorila H, Spector TD et al (2008) The three-factor eating questionnaire, body mass index, and responses to sweet and salty fatty foods: a twin study of genetic and environmental associations. Am J Clin Nutr 88:263–271

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. What the numbers mean: an epidemiological perspective on taste and smell. Availble at http://www.nidcd.nih.gov/health/statistics/smelltaste/Pages/smelltastenumbers.aspx Accessed January 2016

  58. Cullen MM, Leopold DA (1999) Disorders of smell and taste. Med Clin N Am 83:57

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Schiffman SS (1997) Taste and smell losses in normal aging and disease. JAMA-J Am Med Assoc 278:1357–1362

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Boesveldt S, Lindau ST, McClintock MK, Hummel T, Lundstrom JN (2011) Gustatory and olfactory dysfunction in older adults: a national probability study. Rhinology 49:324–330

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Bromley SM (2000) Smell and taste disorders: a primary care approach. Am Fam Physician 61:427–436

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Graham L, Murty G, Bowrey DJ (2014) Taste, smell and appetite change after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery. Obes Surg 24:1463–1468

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Ackerman BH, Kasbekar N (1997) Disturbances of taste and smell induced by drugs. Pharmacotherapy 17:482–496

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Norcliffe-Kaufmann L, Kaufmann H (2012) Familial dysautonomia (Riley-Day syndrome): when baroreceptor feedback fails. Auton Neurosci Basic Clin 172:26–30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Tokita N, Sekhar HK, Sachs M, Daly JF (1978) Familial dysautonomia (Riley-Day syndrome). Temporal bone findings and otolaryngological manifestations. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 87:1–12

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Calvo SS, Egan JM (2015) The endocrinology of taste receptors. Nat Rev Endocrinol 11:213–227

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Liman ER, Zhang YV, Montell C (2014) Peripheral coding of taste. Neuron 81:984–1000

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Crouzet SM, Busch NA, Ohla K (2015) Taste quality decoding parallels taste sensations. Curr Biol: CB 25:890–896

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Behrens M, Meyerhof W (2010) Oral and extraoral bitter taste receptors. Results Probl Cell Differ 52:87–99

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Laffitte A, Neiers F, Briand L (2014) Functional roles of the sweet taste receptor in oral and extraoral tissues. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 17:379–385

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hellas Cena .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cena, H., Oggioni, C. (2016). Tasters, Supertasters, Genes and Environment: How Dietary Choices Influence Our Health. In: Grossi, E., Pace, F. (eds) Human Nutrition from the Gastroenterologist’s Perspective. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30361-1_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30361-1_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-30359-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-30361-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics