Students’ Acceptance of Peer Review

  • Veronika DropčováEmail author
  • Martin Homola
  • Zuzana Kubincová
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering book series (LNICST, volume 160)


Peer review technique used in educational context could be beneficial for students from several points of view. Besides of developing students’ writing skills, critical thinking, practising articulation of own knowledge to the others and giving them feedback, it can encourage collaborative learning and boost the students’ interest in the course. In our web design course we successfully introduced peer review activities more than 2 years ago. In this paper we discuss the students’ acceptance of peer review applied on evaluation of other students’ projects.


Peer review Projects Students opinions 



This work was supported from the Slovak national VEGA project no. 1/0948/13 and the Comenius University Grant no. G-15-168-00.


  1. 1.
    Bejdová, V., Homola, M., Kubincová, Z.: Blogging in obligatory course: a bitter victory. In: Popescu, E., Lau, R.W.H., Pata, K., Leung, H., Laanpere, M. (eds.) ICWL 2014. LNCS, vol. 8613, pp. 1–10. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bejdová, V., Kubincová, Z., Homola, M.: Are students reliable peer-reviewers? In: ICALT (2014)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dropčová, V., Homola, M., Kubincová, Z.: May I peer-review your web design project? In: ICSLE (2015), to appearGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dropčová, V., Kubincová, Z.: Student questionnaire can we trust it? In: ICL 2015 (2015), to appearGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gehringer, E.F.: Strategies and mechanisms for electronic peer review. In: FIE (2000)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gehringer, E.F.: Building resources for teaching computer architecture through electronic peer review. In: WCAE (2003)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Homola, M., Kubincová, Z., Čulík, J., Trungel, T.: Peer-review support in a virtual learning environment. In: PRASAE workshop, ICSLE (2015), to appearGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ken, P.M., Park, K.H., Domazlicky, B.R.: Peer grading of essays in a principles of microeconomics course. J. Educ. Bus. 70(6), 357–361 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kennedy, G.J.: Peer-assessment in group projects: is it worth it? In: ACE (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ladyshewsky, R.K., Gardner, P.: Peer assisted learning and blogging: a strategy to promote reflective practice during clinical fieldwork. Australas J. Educ. Tec. 24(3), 241–257 (2008)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Liu, E.Z.F., Lin, S.S.J., Chiu, C.H., Yuan, S.M.: Web-based peer review: the learner as both adapter and reviewer. IEEE Trans. Educ. 44(3), 246–251 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    MacAlpine, J.M.K.: Improving and encouraging peer assessment of student presentations. Assess Eval. High Educ. 24(1), 15–25 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Popescu, E., Manafu, L.: Repurposing a wiki for collaborative learning-pedagogical and technical view. In: ISTCC (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sterbini, A., Temperini, M.: Dealing with open-answer questions in a peer-assessment environment. In: Popescu, E., Li, Q., Klamma, R., Leung, H., Specht, M. (eds.) ICWL 2012. LNCS, vol. 7558, pp. 240–248. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wu, W.S.: The effect of blog peer review and teacher feedback on the revisions of EFL writers. J. Educ. Foreign Lang. Lit. 3(2), 125–138 (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Veronika Dropčová
    • 1
    Email author
  • Martin Homola
    • 1
  • Zuzana Kubincová
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Mathematics, Physics and InformaticsComenius University in BratislavaBratislavaSlovakia

Personalised recommendations