Assessing Students and Teachers Experience on Simulation and Remote Biotechnology Virtual Labs: A Case Study with a Light Microscopy Experiment

  • Shyam DiwakarEmail author
  • Rakhi Radhamani
  • Hemalatha Sasidharakurup
  • Dhanush Kumar
  • Nijin Nizar
  • Krishnashree Achuthan
  • Bipin Nair
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering book series (LNICST, volume 160)


With recent trends of using Information and Communication Technologies in education, virtual labs have become more prevalent in classrooms of most schools and universities, especially in South India. The purpose of this paper was to perform a comparative analysis of virtual learning components such as animations, simulations and real-time remotely controlled experiments. As a part of this study, we conducted a series of biotechnology virtual lab workshops for University-level users within India and collected feedback related to the usage of virtual labs via direct approach. The survey amongst the students and teachers suggested simulation-based labs were more preferred in enhancing teaching and learning strategy compared to graphics-mediated animations and remotely controlled experiments. This paper also reports some of the issues faced by virtual lab users. Studies indicated that even though the web-based technologies are a new venture in education, it still poses adaptability issues.


Virtual labs Biotechnology Simulation Remote labs Feedback 



This project derives direction and ideas from the Chancellor of Amrita University, Sri Mata Amritanandamayi Devi. This work is funded under the Sakshat project of National Mission on Education through ICT (Phase I and Phase II), Department of Higher Education, MHRD, Government of India.


  1. 1.
    Srivastava, E., Agarwal, N.: E-learning: new trend in education and training. Int. J. Adv. Res. 1, 77–82 (2013)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Redmond, P.: From face-to-face teaching to online teaching: pedagogical transitions. In: Changing Demands, Changing Directions: Proceedings Ascilite Hobart 2011, pp. 1050–1060 (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cook, D.A.: Web-based learning: Pros, cons and controversies. Clin. Med. J. R. Coll. Phys. London 7, 37–42 (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Carmona, M., Marin, J.: Ict Trends in Education. Eur. Sci. J., 24–26 (2013)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Diwakar, S., Parasuram, H., Medini, C., Raman, R., Nedungadi, P., Wiertelak, E., Srivastava, S., Achuthan, K., Nair, B.: Complementing neurophysiology education for developing countries via cost-effective virtual labs: case studies and classroom scenarios. J. Undergrad. Neurosci. Educ. 12, A130–A139 (2014)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Diwakar, S., Radhamani, R., Sujatha, G., Sasidharakurup, H., Shekhar, A., Achuthan, K., Nedungadi, P., Raman, R., Nair, B.: Usage and Diffusion of Biotechnology Virtual Labs for Enhancing University education in India’s Urban and Rural Areas. E-Learning as a Socio-Cultural System: A Multidimensional Analysis, pp. 63–83 (2014)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Radhamani, R., Sasidharakurup, H., Sujatha, G., Nair, B., Achuthan, K., Diwakar, S.: Virtual labs improve student’s performance in a classroom. In: 1st International Conference on e-Learning e-Education and Online Training (2014)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mitra, S., Dangwal, R.: Limits to self-organising systems of learning - The Kalikuppam experiment. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 41, 672–688 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Radhamani, R., Sasidharakurup, H., Kumar, D., Nizar, N., Nair, B., Achuthan, K., Diwakar, S.: Explicit interactions by users form a critical element in virtual labs aiding enhanced education – a case study from biotechnology virtual labs. In: 2014 IEEE Sixth International Conference on Technology for Education, pp. 110–115 (2014)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sasidharakurup, H., Radhamani, R., Kumar, D., Nizar, N., Achuthan, K., Nair, B., Diwakar, S.: Using virtual laboratories as interactive textbooks: studies on blended learning in biotechnology classrooms. EAI Endorsed Trans. e-Learning, Accept (2015)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kumar, D., Singanamala, H., Achuthan, K., Srivastava, S., Nair, B., Diwakar, S.: Implementing a remote-triggered light microscope. In: Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Interdisciplinary Advances in Applied Computing - ICONIAAC 2014, pp. 1–6 (2014)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Markan, C.M., Gupta, P., Manas, Kumar, G., Gupta, S.: Scalable multiuser remote laboratories provide on-demand hands-on laboratory experience. In: Proceedings of 2012 IEEE Conference on Technology Society Asia, T and SA 2012 (2012)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lang, J.: Comparative Study of Hands-on and remote physics labs for first year university level physics students. Transform. Dialogues Teach. Learn. J. 6, 1–25 (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shyam Diwakar
    • 1
    Email author
  • Rakhi Radhamani
    • 1
  • Hemalatha Sasidharakurup
    • 1
  • Dhanush Kumar
    • 1
  • Nijin Nizar
    • 1
  • Krishnashree Achuthan
    • 2
  • Bipin Nair
    • 1
  1. 1.Amrita School of BiotechnologyAmrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham (Amrita University), AmritapuriKollamIndia
  2. 2.Amrita School of Engineering (VALUE Centre)Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham (Amrita University), AmritapuriKollamIndia

Personalised recommendations