Advertisement

Does Character’s Visual Style Affect Viewer’s Perception of Signing Avatars?

  • Nicoletta Adamo-VillaniEmail author
  • Jason Lestina
  • Saikiran Anasingaraju
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering book series (LNICST, volume 160)

Abstract

The paper reports a study that aimed to determine whether character’s visual style has an effect on how signing avatars are perceived by viewers. The stimuli of the study were two polygonal characters that presented two different visual styles: stylized and realistic. Each character signed four sentences. Forty-seven participants with experience in American Sign Language (ASL) viewed the animated signing clips in random order via web survey. They (1) identified the signed sentences (if recognizable), (2) rated their legibility, and (3) rated the appeal of the signing avatar. Findings show that while character’s visual style does not have an effect on subjects’ perceived legibility of the signs and sign recognition, it has an effect on their interest in the character. The stylized signing avatar was perceived as more appealing than the realistic one.

Keywords

Sign language animation Signing avatars Deaf education 

References

  1. 1.
    SignWriting (2015). http://www.signwriting.org/
  2. 2.
    Adamo-Villani, N., Wilbur, R.: Software for math and science education for the deaf. Disabil. Rehabil. Assistive Technol. 5(2), 115–124 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Whitney, S.: Adventure games as teaching tools for deaf and hard of hearing students. In: Journal of Border Education Research (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Vesel, J.: Signing science. Learn. Lead. Technol. 32(8), 30–31 (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vcom3D (2007). http://www.vcom3d.com
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
    Adamo-Villani, N., Wilbur, R., Eccarius, P., Abe-Harris, L.: Effects of character geometric model on the perception of sign language animation. In: IEEE Proceedings of IV 2009, pp. 72–75. Barcelona (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
  9. 9.
    Adamo-Villani, N., Wilbur, R.: Two novel technologies for accessible math and science education. IEEE Multimedia 15(4), 38–46 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhao, L., Kipper, K., Schuler, W., Vogler, C., Badler, N.I., Palmer, M.: A machine translation system from english to american sign language. In: White, J.S. (ed.) AMTA 2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1934, pp. 54–67. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Grieve-Smith, A.: SignSynth: a sign language synthesis application using Web3D and perl. In: Wachsmuth, I., Sowa, T. (eds.) Gesture and Sign Language in Human-Computer Interaction, 2298. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 134–145. Springer, Berlin (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Huenerfauth, M.: A multi-path architecture for machine translation of english text into american sign language animation. In: Student Workshop at the Human Language Technology Conference/North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (HLTNAACL) (2004)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Huenerfauth, M.: Cyclic data-driven research on american sign language animation. In: Proceedings of SLTAT 2011, University of Dundee, UK (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bancroft, T.: Creating Characters with Personality: For Film, TV, Animation, Video Games, and Graphic Novels. Watson-Guptill, New York (2006)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cissell, K.: A study of the effects of computer animated character body style on perception of facial expression. MS thesis (2014). http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1029&context=cgttheses
  16. 16.
    Welch, R., Blackmon, T., Liu, A., Mellers, B., Stark, L.: The effects of pictorial realism, delay of visual feedback, and observer interactivity on the subjective sense of presence. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environ. 5(3), 263–273 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nass, C., Isbister, K., Lee, E.J.: Truth is beauty - researching embodied conversational agents. In: Cassell, J., Sullivan, J., Prevost, S., Churchill, E. (eds.) Embodied Conversational Agents, pp. 374–402. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    McCloud, S.: Understanding Comics. HarperPerennial, New York (1993)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ekman, P., Rosenberg, E.L.: What the Face Reveals: Basic and Applied Studies of Spontaneous Expression Using the Facial Action Coding System (FACS). Oxford University Press, Oxford (1997)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mori, M., MacDorman, K.F., Kageki, N.: The Uncanny Valley. IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 19(2), 98–100 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Film.com (2015). http://www.Film.com/
  22. 22.
    Cracked.com (2007). http://www.cracked.com/
  23. 23.

Copyright information

© Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicoletta Adamo-Villani
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jason Lestina
    • 1
  • Saikiran Anasingaraju
    • 1
  1. 1.Purdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA

Personalised recommendations