Skip to main content

How to Treat EGJ Cancer: Indications and Treatment Strategy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagogastric Junction

Abstract

Esophagogastric junction (EGJ) adenocarcinoma has been differently classified over time. In 1996, Siewert and coworkers introduced a classification (AEG classification or Siewert classification) for this cancer, which has been adopted by the ISDE congress in 1997 and it was used without modifications ever since. It is undoubtedly the most used classification for EGJ cancer worldwide.

Surgery with lymphadenectomy has always been considered the standard approach to EGJ cancer, with some differences due to Siewert type. Aims of surgery are reaching a curative R0 resection and good survival. Surgical choices are based on neoplastic diffusion, which differs based on cancer site and depth of cancer invasion in the wall of esophagus and stomach.

In this chapter, indications and treatment strategy for all Siewert types are described, with particular interest on surgical margins, lymphadenectomy, and surgical approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Sjoquist KM, Burmeister BH, Smithers BM et al (2011) Survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for resectable oesophageal carcinoma: an updated meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 12(7):681–692

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lv J, Cao XF, Zhu B et al (2009) Effect of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy on prognosis and surgery for esophageal carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 15(39):4962–4968

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Ronellenfitsch U, Schwarzbach M, Hofheinz R et al (2013) Perioperative chemo(radio)therapy versus primary surgery for resectable adenocarcinoma of the stomach, gastroesophageal junction, and lower esophagus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 5(5):CD008107

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lutz MP, Zalcberg JR, Ducreux M et al (2012) Highlights of the EORTC St. Gallen international expert consensus on the primary therapy of gastric, gastroesophageal and oesophageal cancer – differential treatment strategies for subtypes of early gastroesophageal cancer. Eur J Cancer 48(16):2941–2953

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancers NCCN Guidelines. Version 3.2015

    Google Scholar 

  6. Moehler M, Baltin CT, Ebert M et al (2015) International comparison of the German evidence-based S3-guidelines on the diagnosis and multimodal treatment of early and locally advanced gastric cancer, including adenocarcinoma of the lower esophagus. Gastric Cancer 18(3):550–563

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Allum WH, Blazeby JM, Griffin SM et al (2011) Guidelines for the management of oesophageal and gastric cancer. Gut 60(11):1449–1472

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Malthaner R, Wong RKS, Spithoff K (2010) Preoperative or postoperative therapy for resectable oesophageal cancer: an updated practice guideline. Clin Oncol 22(4):250–256

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Van Hagen P, Hulshof MCCM, van Lanschot JJB et al (2012) Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer. N Engl J Med 366(22):2074–2084

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Stahl M, Walz MK, Stuschke M et al (2009) Phase III comparison of preoperative chemotherapy compared with chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction. J Clin Oncol 27(6):851–856

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Burmeister BH, Thomas JM, Burmeister E et al (2011) Is concurrent radiation therapy required in patients receiving preoperative chemotherapy for adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus? A randomised phase II trial. Eur J Cancer 47(3):354–360

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cunningham D, Allum WH, Stenning SP et al (2006) Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer. N Engl J Med 355:11–20

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Curtis NJ, Noble F, Bailey IS et al (2014) The relevance of the Siewert classification in the era of multimodal therapy for adenocarcinoma of the gastro-oesophageal junction. J Surg Oncol 109(3):202–207

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hasegawa S, Yoshikawa T (2010) Adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: Incidence, characteristics, and treatment strategies. Gastric Cancer 13(2):63–73

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Reynolds JV, Ravi N, Muldoon C et al (2010) Differential pathologic variables and outcomes across the spectrum of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction. World J Surg 34(12):2821–2829

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sgourakis G, Gockel I, Lang H (2013) Endoscopic and surgical resection of T1a/T1b esophageal neoplasms: a systematic review. World J Gastroenterol 19(9):1424–1437

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Japanese Esophageal Society (2008) Japanese classification of esophageal cancer, 10th edn. Kaneara & Co., Tokyo. 6(1):1–25

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dunbar KB, Spechler SJ (2012) The risk of lymph node metastases in patients with high grade dysplasia or intramucosal carcinoma in Barrett’s esophagus: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol 107(6):850–863

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Luna RA, Gilbert E, Hunter JG (2012) High-grade dysplasia and intramucosal adenocarcinoma in Barrett’s esophagus: the role of esophagectomy in the era of endoscopic eradication therapy. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 28(4):362–369

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Prasad GA, Wu TT, Wigle D et al (2009) Endoscopic and surgical treatment of mucosal (T1a) esophageal adenocarcinoma in Barrett’s esophagus. Gastro-enterology 137(3):815–823

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zehetner J, Demeester SR, Hagen J et al (2011) Endoscopic resection and ablation versus esophagectomy for high-grade dysplasia and intramucosal adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 141(1):39–47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ngamruengphong S, Wolfsen HC, Wallace MB (2013) Survival of patients with superficial esophageal adenocarcinoma following endoscopic treatment vs surgery. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 11(11):1424–e81

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Westerterp M, Koppert LB, Buskens CJ et al (2005) Outcome of surgical treatment for early adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or gastro-esophageal junction. Virchows Arch 446(5):497–504

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Oh DS, Hagen J, Chandrasoma PT et al (2006) Clinical biology and surgical therapy of intramucosal adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. J Am Coll Surg 203(2):152–161

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Raziee HR, Cardoso R, Seevaratnam R et al (2012) Systematic review of the predictors of positive margins in gastric cancer surgery and the effect on survival. Gastric Cancer 15:116–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Papachristou DN, Agnanti N, D’Agostino H et al (1980) Histologically positive esophageal margin in the surgical treatment of gastric cancer. Am J Surg 139(5):711–713

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Gao F, Chen J, Wang T et al (2014) Incidence of microscopically positive proximal margins in adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction. PLoS One 9(2):e88010

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Szántó I, Vörös A, Nagy P et al (2002) Esophageal intramural metastasis from adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction. Endoscopy 34(5):418–420

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lam KY, Ma LT, Wong J (1996) Measurement of extent of spread of oesophageal squamous carcinoma by serial sectioning. J Clin Pathol 49(2):124–129

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Tsutsui S, Kuwano H, Watanabe M et al (1995) Resection margin for squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Ann Surg 222(2):193–202

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Law S, Arcilla C, Chu KM et al (1998) The significance of histologically infiltrated resection margin after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Am J Surg 176(3):286–290

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Khoshnevis J, Moradi A, Azargashb E et al (2013) A study of contractility of proximal surgical margin in esophageal cancer. Iran J Cancer Prev 6(1):25–27

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Barbour AP, Rizk NP, Gonen M et al (2007) Adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction: influence of esophageal resection margin and operative approach on outcome. Ann Surg 246(1):1–8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Mariette C, Castel B, Balon JM et al (2003) Extent of oesophageal resection for adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction. Eur J Surg Oncol 29(7):588–593

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Ito H, Clancy TE, Osteen RT et al (2004) Adenocarcinoma of the gastric cardia: what is the optimal surgical approach? J Am Coll Surg 199(6):880–886

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Mine S, Sano T, Hiki N et al (2013) Proximal margin length with transhiatal gastrectomy for Siewert type II and III adenocarcinomas of the oesophagogastric junction. Br J Surg 100(8):1050–1054

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Shen KR, Cassivi SD, Deschamps C et al (2006) Surgical treatment of tumors of the proximal stomach with involvement of the distal esophagus: a 26-year experience with Siewert type III tumors. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 132(4):755–762

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Casson AG, Darnton SJ, Subramanian S et al (2000) What is the optimal distal resection margin for esophageal carcinoma? Ann Thorac Surg 69(1):205–209

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. DiMusto PD, Orringer MB (2007) Transhiatal esophagectomy for distal and cardia cancers: implications of a positive gastric margin. Ann Thorac Surg 83(6):1993–1999

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Chao YK, Yeh CJ, Chang HK et al (2011) Impact of circumferential resection margin distance on locoregional recurrence and survival after chemoradiotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 18(2):529–534

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Deeter M, Dorer R, Kuppusamy MK et al (2009) Assessment of criteria and clinical significance of circumferential resection margins in esophageal cancer. Arch Surg 144(7):618–624

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Scheepers JJG, Van Der Peet DL, Veenhof A et al (2009) Influence of circumferential resection margin on prognosis in distal esophageal and gastroesophageal cancer approached through the transhiatal route. Dis Esophagus 22(1):42–48

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Sujendran V, Wheeler J, Baron R et al (2008) Effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on circumferential margin positivity and its impact on prognosis in patients with resectable oesophageal cancer. Br J Surg 95(2):191–194

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. De Manzoni G, Verlato G, Di Leo A et al (2006) Peritoneal cytology does not increase the prognostic information provided by TNM in gastric cancer. World J Surg 30(4):579–584

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Rice TW, Blackstone EH, Rusch VW (2010) 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual: esophagus and esophagogastric junction. Ann Surg Oncol 17(7):1721–1724

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Chan DSY, Reid TD, Howell I et al (2013) Systematic review and meta-analysis of the influence of circumferential resection margin involvement on survival in patients with operable oesophageal cancer. Br J Surg 100(4):456–464

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Wu J, Chen QX, Teng LS et al (2014) Prognostic significance of positive circumferential resection margin in esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 97(2):446–453

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Peyre CG, Hagen JA, DeMeester SR et al (2008) Predicting systemic disease in patients with esophageal cancer after esophagectomy: a multinational study on the significance of the number of involved lymph nodes. Ann Surg 248(6):979–985

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Mariette C, Piessen G, Briez N et al (2008) The number of metastatic lymph nodes and the ratio between metastatic and examined lymph nodes are independent prognostic factors in esophageal cancer regardless of neoadjuvant chemoradiation or lymphadenectomy extent. Ann Surg 247(2):365–371

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Smit JK, Pultrum BB, Van Dullemen HM et al (2010) Prognostic factors and patterns of recurrence in esophageal cancer assert arguments for extended two-field transthoracic esophagectomy. Am J Surg 200(4):446–453

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Johansson J, DeMeester TR, Hagen JA et al (2004) En bloc vs transhiatal esophagectomy for stage T3 N1 adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus. Arch Surg 139(6):627–631

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Omloo JMT, Lagarde SM, Hulscher JBF et al (2007) Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the mid/distal esophagus: five-year survival of a randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg 246(6):992–1000

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Hölscher AH, Drebber U, Schmidt H et al (2014) Prognostic classification of histopathologic response to neoadjuvant therapy in esophageal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg 260(5):779–785

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Rice TW, Blackstone EH (2013) Lymph node ratio: a confounded quotient. Ann Thorac Surg 96(2):744

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Rizk NP, Ishwaran H, Rice TW et al (2010) Optimum lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer. Ann Surg 251(1):46–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Altorki NK, Zhou XK, Stiles B et al (2008) Total number of resected lymph nodes predicts survival in esophageal cancer. Ann Surg 248(2):221–226

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Groth SS, Virnig BA, Whitson BA et al (2010) Determination of the minimum number of lymph nodes to examine to maximize survival in patients with esophageal carcinoma: data from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 139(3):612–620

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Peyre CG, Hagen JA, DeMeester SR et al (2008) The number of lymph nodes removed predicts survival in esophageal cancer: an international study on the impact of extent of surgical resection. Ann Surg 248(4):549–556

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Stiles BM, Nasar A, Mirza FA et al (2012) Worldwide oesophageal cancer collaboration guidelines for lymphadenectomy predict survival following neoadjuvant therapy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 42(4):659–664

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Lerut T (2012) Cancer of the oesophagus and gastrooesophageal junction: neoadjuvant therapy should not be a surrogate for suboptimal lymphadenectomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 42(4):664–666

    Google Scholar 

  61. Bollschweiler E, Besch S, Drebber U et al (2010) Influence of neoadjuvant chemoradiation on the number and size of analyzed lymph nodes in esophageal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 17(12):3187–3194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. McGuill MJ, Byrne P, Ravi N et al (2008) The prognostic impact of occult lymph node metastasis in cancer of the esophagus or esophago-gastric junction: systematic review and meta-analysis. Dis Esophagus 21(3):236–240

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Gertler R, Stein HJ, Schuster T et al (2014) Prevalence and topography of lymph node metastases in early esophageal and gastric cancer. Ann Surg 259(1):96–101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Barbour AP, Jones M, Brown I et al (2010) Risk stratification for early esophageal adenocarcinoma: analysis of lymphatic spread and prognostic factors. Ann Surg Oncol 17(9):2494–2502

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Bollschweiler E, Baldus SE, Schröder W et al (2006) High rate of lymph-node metastasis in submucosal esophageal squamous-cell carcinomas and adenocarcinomas. Endoscopy 38(2):149–156

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Pedrazzani C, de Manzoni G, Marrelli D et al (2007) Lymph node involvement in advanced gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 134(2):378–385

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Zhang X, DI Watson JG (2007) Lymph node metastases of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction. Chin Med J 120(24):2268–2270

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Meier I, Merkel S, Papadopoulos T et al (2008) Adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: the pattern of metastatic lymph node dissemination as a rationale for elective lymphatic target volume definition. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 70(5):1408–1417

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Feith M, Stein HJ, Siewert JR (2003) Pattern of lymphatic spread of Barrett’s cancer. World J Surg 27(9):1052–1057

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Leers JM, DeMeester SR, Chan N et al (2009) Clinical characteristics, biologic behavior, and survival after esophagectomy are similar for adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction and the distal esophagus. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 138(3):594–602

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Dresner SM, Lamb PJ, Bennett MK et al (2001) The pattern of metastatic lymph node dissemination from adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction. Surgery 129(1):103–109

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Mönig SP, Baldus SE, Zirbes TK et al (2002) Topographical distribution of lymph node metastasis in adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction. Hepatogastroenterology 49(44):419–422

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Kakeji Y, Yamamoto M, Ito S et al (2012) Lymph node metastasis from cancer of the esophagogastric junction, and determination of the appropriate nodal dissection. Surg Today 42(4):351–358

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Lerut T, Nafteux P, Moons J et al (2004) Three-field lymphadenectomy for carcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction in 174 R0 resections: impact on staging, disease-free survival, and outcome: a plea for adaptation of TNM classification in upper-half esophageal carcinoma. Ann Surg 240(6):962–972

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Altorki N, Kent M, Ferrara C et al (2002) Three-field lymph node dissection for squamous cell and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. Ann Surg 236(2):177–183

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Nakamura M, Iwahashi M, Nakamori M et al (2012) Lower mediastinal lymph node metastasis is an independent survival factor of siewert type II and III adenocarcinomas in the gastroesophageal junction. Am Surg 78(5):567–573

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Yuasa N, Miyake H, Yamada T et al (2006) Clinicopathologic comparison of Siewert type II and III adenocarcinomas of the gastroesophageal junction. World J Surg 30(3):364–371

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Mine S, Sano T, Hiki N et al (2013) Lymphadenectomy around the left renal vein in Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction. Br J Surg 100(2):261–266

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Hosokawa Y, Kinoshita T, Konishi M et al (2012) Clinicopathological features and prognostic factors of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction according to Siewert classification: experiences at a single institution in Japan. Ann Surg Oncol 19(2):677–683

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Nunobe S, Ohyama S, Sonoo H et al (2008) Benefit of mediastinal and para-aortic lymph-node dissection for advanced gastric cancer with esophageal invasion. J Surg Oncol 97(5):392–395

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Kurokawa Y, Hiki N, Yoshikawa T et al (2015) Mediastinal lymph node metastasis and recurrence in adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction. Surgery 157(3):551–555

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Hasegawa S, Yoshikawa T, Rino Y et al (2013) Priority of lymph node dissection for Siewert type II/III adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction. Ann Surg Oncol 20:4252–4259

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Sasako M, McCulloch P, Kinoshita T (1995) New method to evaluate the therapeutic value of lymph node dissection for gastric cancer. Br J Surg 82(3):346–351

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. De Manzoni G, Morgagni P, Roviello F et al (1998) Nodal abdominal spread in adenocarcinoma of the cardia. Results of a multicenter prospective study. Gastric Cancer 1(2):146–151

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Fumagalli U, Akiyama H, DeMeester T (1996) Resective surgery for cancer of the thoracic esophagus: results of a consensus conference held at the VIth World Congress of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus. Dis Esophagus 9:30–38

    Google Scholar 

  86. Mariette C, Piessen G, Briez N et al (2011) Oesophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma: which therapeutic approach? Lancet Oncol 12(3):296–305

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Goto H, Tokunaga M, Sugisawa N et al (2013) Value of splenectomy in patients with Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction. Gastric Cancer 16(4):590–595

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Suttie SA, Nanthakumaran S, Mofidi R et al (2012) The impact of operative approach for oesophageal cancer on outcome: the transhiatal approach may influence circumferential margin involvement. Eur J Surg Oncol 38(2):157–165

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Boshier PR, Anderson O, Hanna GB (2011) Transthoracic versus transhiatal esophagectomy for the treatment of esophagogastric cancer. Ann Surg 254(6):894–906

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Wei MT, Zhang YC, Deng XB et al (2014) Transthoracic vs transhiatal surgery for cancer of the esophagogastric junction: a meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 20(29):10183–10192

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  91. Davies AR, Sandhu H, Pillai A et al (2014) Surgical resection strategy and the influence of radicality on outcomes in oesophageal cancer. Br J Surg 101(5):511–517

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Stiles BM, Mirza F, Coppolino A et al (2011) Clinical T2-T3N0M0 esophageal cancer: the risk of node positive disease. Ann Thorac Surg 92(2):491–498

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Hasegawa S, Yoshikawa T, Cho H et al (2009) Is adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction different between Japan and western countries? The incidence and clinicopathological features at a Japanese high-volume cancer center. World J Surg 33(1):95–103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Suh YS, Han DS, Kong SH et al (2012) Should adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction be classified as esophageal cancer? A comparative analysis according to the seventh AJCC TNM classification. Ann Surg 255(5):908–915

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Pedrazzani C (2015) Should adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction be classified as gastric or esophageal cancer, or else as a distinct clinical entity? Ann Surg 261(4):e107–e108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Siewert JR, Feith M, Stein HJ (2005) Biologic and clinical variations of adenocarcinoma at the esophago-gastric junction: Relevance of a topographic-anatomic subclassification. J Surg Oncol 90(3):139–146

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Parry K, Haverkamp L, Bruijnen RCG et al (2014) Surgical treatment of adenocarcinomas of the gastro-esophageal junction. Ann Surg Oncol 22(2):597–603

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Sasako M, Sano T, Yamamoto S et al (2006) Left thoracoabdominal approach versus abdominal-transhiatal approach for gastric cancer of the cardia or subcardia: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 7(8):644–651

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Kurokawa Y, Sasako M, Sano T et al (2015) Ten-year follow-up results of a randomized clinical trial comparing left thoracoabdominal and abdominal transhiatal approaches to total gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction or gastric cardia. Br J Surg 102(4):341–348

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  100. Pedrazzani C, Bernini M, Giacopuzzi S et al (2005) Evaluation of Siewert classification in gastro-esophageal junction adenocarcinoma: what is the role of endoscopic ultrasonography? J Surg Oncol 91(4):226–231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrea Zanoni .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zanoni, A., Giacopuzzi, S., Laiti, S., Di Leo, A., de Manzoni, G. (2017). How to Treat EGJ Cancer: Indications and Treatment Strategy. In: Giacopuzzi, S., Zanoni, A., de Manzoni, G. (eds) Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagogastric Junction. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28776-8_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28776-8_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28774-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28776-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics