Skip to main content

Redefining Assessment in Contemporary Classrooms: Shifting Practices and Policies

  • Chapter
Assessment in Education

Part of the book series: The Enabling Power of Assessment ((EPAS,volume 2))

Abstract

This chapter explores the evolution of assessment for students with individual learning needs in both the Canadian and global context. Assessment practices may have developed to support students with developmental issues but in today’s schools they are morphing into approaches for a whole other level of individual learning need. This chapter argues that a singular paradigm of assessment no longer exists and that written policy is struggling to stay abreast of a rapidly evolving school context. While this shift in policy and practice is resulting from a number of issues, two in particular –globalisation and inclusion – each are bringing unique criticism of traditional assessment methods that have held to a “testing and labelling” approach. Contemporary schools are characterised by an ethnically diverse population, heightened student mobility and an evolving paradigm of ability. As a result, the praxis between written and enacted policy for assessment is being re-examined. There is growing recognition of a need to shift assessment away from diagnostic/prescriptive approaches back into the hands of teachers. This chapter discusses the impact of this trend and calls for both a re-examination of teacher readiness for change as well as a re-definition of the role of formally testing children with individual needs. It argues that the contemporary classroom is characterised by an inclusive model of support planning where philosophy blends with practice in identifying and accommodating the needs of all students. The chapter concludes with a discussion of the implications of this paradigm shift for educational leaders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allan, J. (1996). Foucault and special educational needs: A ‘box of tools’ for analyzing children’s experiences of mainstreaming. Disability and Society, 11(2), 219–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alur, M. (2002). Status of disabled people in India: Policy and inclusion. Exceptionality Education Canada, 12(2/3), 137–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armour-Thomas, E. (1992). Intellectual assessment of children from culturally diverse backgrounds. School Psychology Review, 21(4), 552–565.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, F., Armstrong, D., & Barton, L. (2000). Inclusive education: Policy, contexts and comparative perspectives. London: David Fulton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Artiles, A. J. (2003). Special education’s changing identity: Paradoxes and dilemmas in views of culture and space. Harvard Educational Review, 73(2), 164–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Artiles, A. J., & Trent, S. C. (1994). Over representation of minority students in special education. The Journal of Special Education, 27(4), 410–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashman, A. F., & Conway, R. N. F. (1993). Examining the links between psychoeducational assessment, instruction and remediation. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 40(1), 23–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2009). Estimates and projections: 1991-2021. Retrieved from: www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@nsf/mediareleases by catalogue.

  • Banks, J., Cochran-Smith, M., Moll, L., Richert, A., Zeichner, K., LePage, P., et al. (2005). Teaching diverse learners. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world (pp. 32–276). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, R., Danielson, L., & Doolittle, J. (2007, May/June). Responsiveness to intervention: 1997–2007. Teaching Exceptional Children, 39, 8–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. R., Higgins, K., Pierce, T., Hong, E., & Thomas, C. (2004). Secondary students’ perceptions of school life with regard to alienation: The effects of disability, gender and race. Learning Disability Quarterly, 26(4), 227–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, G. E. (1995). Factors and themes in native education and school boards: First Nations tuition negations and tuition agreement schooling. Canadian Journal of Native Education, 22(1), 53–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buysse, V., Goldman, B. D., & Skinner, M. L. (2003). Setting effects on friendship formation among young children with and without disabilities. Exceptional Children, 68(4), 503–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chappuis, J. (2005). Helping students understand assessment. Educational Leadership. November, 39–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chinn, P. C., & Hughes, S. (1987). Representation of minority students in special classes. Remedial and Special Education, 8(4), 41–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, S. G. (2008). Differentiated instruction in the elementary classroom. The Education Digest, 73(9), 52–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crocker, R., & Dibbon, D. (2008). Teacher education in Canada. Kelowna, BC: Society of the Advancement of Excellence in Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, J. (1984). Bilingualism and special education: Issues in assessment and pedagogy. San Diego: College Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danforth, S. (1999). Pragmatism and the scientific validation of professional practices in American special education. Disability & Society, 14(6), 733–751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L., & Falk, B. (1997). Supporting teaching and learning for all students: Policies for authentic assessment systems. In A. L. Goodwin (Ed.), Assessment for equity and inclusion: Embracing all our children (pp. 51–76). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delaney, J. G. (2002). Educational policy studies: A practical approach. Calgary, AB: Detselig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donovan, S., & Cross, C. (Eds.). (2002). Minority students in special and gifted education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driedger, D. (1989). The last civil rights movement: Disabled peoples’ international. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunnell, K. (2008). Diversity and different experiences in the UK. Retrieved from: www.statistics.gov.uk/articles/nojournal/NSA_article

  • Duren-Green, T., McIntosh, A. S., Cook-Morales, V. J., & Robinson, Z. C. (2005). From old schools to tomorrow’s schools: Psychoeducational assessment of African-american students. Remedial and Special Education, 26(2), 82–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dworet, D., & Bennett, S. (2002). A view from the North: Special education in Canada. Teaching Exceptional Children, 34(5), 22–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earl, L. M. (2003). Assessment as learning: Using classroom assessment to maximize student learning (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmunds, A. L., & Martsch-Litt, S. (2008). ADHD assessment and diagnosis in Canada: An inconsistent but fixable process. Exceptionality Education Canada, 18(2/3), 3–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1977). Intellectuals and power: A conversation between Michael Foucault and Giles Deleuze. In D. Bouchard (Ed.), Language, counter-memory, practice: Selected essays and interviews by Michael Foucault (pp. 205–217). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friend, M., Bursuck, W., & Hutchinson, N. (1998). Including exceptional students. Scarborough, ON: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (1995). What’s “special” about special education? Phi Delta Kappan, 76(7), 522–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulcher, G. (1989). Disabling policies? A comparative approach to education policy and disability. London: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P. (2001). A socio-cultural perspective on early literacy development. In S. B. Newman & D. K. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (pp. 30–42). New York: Guildford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gersten, R., Baker, S., & Pugach, M. (2001). Contemporary research on special education teaching. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 695–722). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, K. (2004). Frequently asked questions (FAQ) regarding Response to Intervention (RTI) and upcoming idea reauthorization. Retrieved from: http://www.mnase.org

  • Goodwin, A. L., & Macdonald, M. B. (1997). Educating the rainbow: Authentic assessment and authentic practice for diverse classrooms. In A. L. Goodwin (Ed.), Assessment for equity and inclusion: Embracing all our children (pp. 211–227). New York: Rutledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopaul-McNichol, S., & Armour-Thomas, E. (2002). Assessment and culture: Psychological tests with minority populations. San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, W. T. S., & Findlay, A. M. (1994). Population and the changing world order. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of Alberta. (2006). Alberta commission on learning. Retrieved from: http://education.alberta.ca/department/ipr/commission.aspx

  • Government of Nova Scotia. (2007). Minister’s review of services for students with special needs. Retrieved from: http://www.ednet.ns.ca/events/special_education_review/documents/review-committee-report-e.pdf

  • Grobe, W. J., & McCall, D. (2004). Valid uses of student testing as part of authentic and comprehensive student assessment, school reports, and school system accountability: A statement of concern from the International Confederation of Principals. Educational Horizons, 82(2), 131–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargrove, L. J. (2000). Assessment and inclusion: A teacher’s perspective. Preventing School Failure, 45(1), 18–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hockenbury, J. C., Kauffman, J. M., & Hallahan, D. P. (2000). What is right about special education? Exceptionality, 8(1), 3–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holdnack, J. A., & Weiss, L. G. (2006). IDEA 2004: Anticipated implications for clinical practice – integrating assessment and intervention. Psychology in the Schools, 43(8), 871–882.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, N. L. (2009). Inclusion of exceptional learners in Canadian schools. Toronto, ON, Canada: Pearson Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, J. M. (2000). The special education story: Obituary, accident report, conversion experience, reincarnation, or none of the above? Exceptionality, 8(1), 61–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klassen, B. (2002). The changing landscape of learning disabilities in Canada: Definitions and practice from 1989–2000. School Psychology International, 23(2), 199–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klassen, R. M., Neufeld, P., & Munro, F. (2005). When IQ is irrelevant to the definition of learning disabilities: Australian school psychologists’ beliefs and practice. School Psychology International, 26(3), 297–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klingner, J. K., & Edwards, P. A. (2006). Cultural considerations with response to intervention models. Reading Research Quarterly, 41(1), 108–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klingner, J. K., Vaughn, S., Schumm, J. S., Cohen, P., & Forgan, J. W. (1998). Inclusion or pull-out: Which do students prefer? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31(2), 148–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozey, M., & Siegel, L. S. (2008). Definitions of learning disabilities in Canadian provinces and territories. Canadian Psychology, 49(2), 162–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, J., & Johns, B. (2009). Learning disabilities and related mild disabilities (11th ed.). New York: Houghton/Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J. E. (1998). Nontraditional uses of traditional aptitude tests. In R. J. Samunda, R. Feuerstein, A. S. Kauffman, J. E. Lewis, R. J. Sternberg, et al. (Eds.), Advances in cross-cultural assessment (pp. 218–241). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lidz, C. S. (2001). Multicultural issues and dynamic assessment. In L. A. Suzuki, J. G. Ponterotto, & P. J. Meller (Eds.), Handbook of multicultural assessment (2nd ed., pp. 523–539). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsky, D. K., & Gartner, A. (1997). Inclusion and school reform. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsky, D. K., & Gartner, A. (1998). Taking inclusion into the future. Educational Leadership, 30(2), 198–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lupart, J. L. (1999). Inching toward inclusion: The excellence/equity dilemma in our schools. Paper presented at PCERA Symposium, Ottawa, ON, Canada, February 16–17, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, G. R. (2005). Why scientific research must guide educational policy and instructional practices in learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 28(2), 140–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald, I. (1981). Assessment: A social dimension. In L. Barton & S. Tomlinson (Eds.), Special education: Policy, practices and social issues (pp. 90–108). London: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, C., Rezai-Rashti, G. M., & Teasley, C. (2009). Race, diversity, and curriculum in the era of globalization. Oxford, UK: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, T. (2002). Inclusion in Aotearoa/New Zealand: From rhetoric to reality. Exceptionality Education Canada, 12(2/3), 53–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaren, P. (1998). Che: The pedagogy of Che Guevara: Critical pedagogy and globalization thirty years after Che. Cultural Circles, 3, 29–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, M. W. (1991). Test-based account as a reform strategy. Phi Delta Kappan, 73, 248–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Migration Watch UK. (2009). Future migration trends. Retrieved from: www.migrationwatchuk.org/briefingpaper/document/96

  • Mittler, P. (2000). Working towards inclusive education: Social contexts. London: David Fulton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore-Brown, B., Huerta, M., Uranga-Hernandez, Y., & Pena, E. D. (2006). Using dynamic assessment to evaluate children with suspected learning disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic, 41(4), 209–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morse, W. C. (1996). Forward. In M. Friend & L. Cook (Eds.), Interactions: Collaboration skills for school professionals (pp. xiii–xvii). White Plains, NY: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthukrishna, N. (2002). Inclusive education policy and practice in South Africa: Trends, dimensions, and issues. Exceptionality Education Canada, 12(2/3), 77–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Educational Statistics. (2009). Projections of educational statistics to 2018. Retrieved October 21, 2011 from: http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2009/2009062.pdf

  • National Commission on Educational Excellence. (1983). A nation at risk. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noddings, N. (1992). The challenge to care in schools: An alternative to care in schools. New York: Teachers’ College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padilla, A. M. (2001). Issues in culturally appropriate assessment. In L. A. Suzuki, J. G. Ponterotto, & P. J. Meller (Eds.), Handbook of multicultural assessment (2nd ed., pp. 5–27). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philpott, D. F. (2007a). Focusing on students: The final report of the ISSP/Pathways Commission. St. John’s, NL: Queen’s Printer/Government of Newfoundland and Labrador.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philpott, D. F. (2007b). Assessing without labels: Inclusive education in the Canadian context. Exceptionality Education Canada, 17(3), 3–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philpott, D. F., & Cahill, M. (2008). A Pan-Canadian perspective on the professional knowledge base of learning disabilities. International Journal of Disability and Community Rehabilitation, 7(2), www.ijdcr.ca/

  • Philpott, D. F., & Dibbon, D. (2008). The evolution of disability studies amidst school reform in Newfoundland and Labrador. The Morning Watch, 36(1–27).

    Google Scholar 

  • Philpott, D. F., Sharpe, D. & Neville, R. (2009). The effectiveness of web-delivered learning with aboriginal students: Findings from a study in coastal Labrador. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 35(3). www.cjlt.ca

  • Philpott, D. F., Furey, E., & Penney, S. C. (2010). Promoting leadership in the ongoing professional development of teachers: Responding to globalization and inclusion. Exceptionality Education International, 20(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Salend, S. J. (2001). Creating inclusive classrooms (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samunda, R. J. (1975). From ethnocentrism to a multicultural perspective in educational testing. Journal of Afro-American Issues, 3(1), 4–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samunda, R. J. (1998). Cross-cultural assessment: Issues and alternatives. In R. J. Samunda, R. Feuerstein, A. S. Kauffman, J. E. Lewis, R. J. Sternberg, et al. (Eds.), Advances in cross-cultural assessment (pp. 1–19). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sands, D. S., Kozelski, E., & French, N. (2001). Inclusive education for the 21st century. Toronto, ON, Canada: Wadworth Thomson Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassen, S. (1996). Losing control: Sovereignty in an age of globalization. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sergiovanni, T. (1994). Building community in schools. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shevlin, M. (2002). Special education in Ireland: At the crossroads. Exceptionality Education Canada, 12(2/3), 125–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skrtic, T. M. (1995). The special education knowledge tradition: Crisis and opportunity. In E. L. Meyen & T. M. Skrtic (Eds.), Special education and student disability: An introduction – traditional, emerging, and alternative perspectives (pp. 609–672). Denver, CO: Love Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slee, R. (2002). Developing theories and practices of inclusion in Australia. Exceptionality Education Canada, 12(2/3), 103–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. D. (1998). Inclusion: Schools for all students. New York: Wadsworth Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T. E., Polloway, E. A., Patton, J. R., & Dowdy, C. A. (1998). Teaching students with special needs in inclusive settings. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T. E., Polloway, E. A., Patton, J. R., Dowdy, C. A., & Heath, N. L. (2001). Teaching students with special needs in inclusive settings (Canadian ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stainback, S., & Stainback, W. (1992). Curriculum considerations in inclusive schools: Facilitating learning in inclusive classrooms. Toronto, ON, Canada: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, L. D. (2003). Developments in curriculum-based measurement. The Journal of Special Education, 37(3), 184–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, P. J., & Jordan, A. (2000). Effective teaching as effective intervention. Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 10(4), 235–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Canada. (2007). Portrait of the Canadian population 2006. Retrieved March 23, 2007, from: www12.statcan.ca/english/census06/analysis/popdwell/highlights.cfm

  • Statistics Canada. (2008). The daily. Retrieved April 9, 2008, from: www12.statcan.ca/english/070426/d070426a.html

  • Statistics New Zealand. (2004). National ethnic population projections 2001-2021. Retrieved October 9, 2011 from: http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/APCITY/UNPAN016776

  • Taylor, L. S., & Whittaker, C. R. (2009). Bridging multiple worlds: Case studies of diverse educational communities. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, G. (1997). Inclusive schools for an inclusive society. British Journal of Special Education, 24(3), 103–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timmons, V. (2002). International perspectives on inclusion: Concluding thoughts. Exceptionality Education Canada, 12(2/3), 187–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Development Programme. (2009). Overcoming barriers: Human mobility and development. Retrieved from: http://www.undp.org/hdr2009.shtml

  • Waldron, N. L., & McLesky, J. (1998). The effects of an inclusive school program on students with mild and severe learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 64(3), 395–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ware, L. (2000). Sunflowers, enchantment and empires: Reflections on inclusive education in the United States. In F. Armstrong, D. Armstrong, & L. Barton (Eds.), Inclusive education; policy, contexts and comparative perspectives. London: David Fulton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, K. (1994). Special education in Canadian schools. Thornhill, ON: Highland Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, J. (2004). Do peer relationships foster behavioral adjustment in children with learning disabilities? Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 27(1), 21–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, G. P. (1993). Assessing student performance: Exploring the purpose and limits of testing. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wincott, D. (2006). New social risks and the changing welfare state: Ideas, policy drift and early childhood education and care policies in Australia, the UK and the USA. Paper presentation at the 2006 annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia. Retrieved from: http://www.asu.edu/clas/polisci/cqrm/APSA2006/Wincott_Social_Risks.pdf

  • Wink, J. (2005). Critical pedagogy: Notes from the real world. Boston: Allyn Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ysseldyke, J. E., Algozzine, B., & Thurlow, M. L. (1991). Critical issues in special education (2nd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ysseldyke, J. E., & Shinn, M. (1981). Psychoeducational evaluation: Procedures, considerations, and limitations. In D. Hallahan & J. Kauffman (Eds.), The handbook of special education (pp. 418–446). Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zigmond, N. (2003). Searching for the most effective service delivery model for students with learning disabilities. In H. L. Swanson, K. R. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 110–122). New York: Guildford.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David F. Philpott .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Philpott, D.F. (2016). Redefining Assessment in Contemporary Classrooms: Shifting Practices and Policies. In: Scott, S., Scott, D., Webber, C. (eds) Assessment in Education. The Enabling Power of Assessment, vol 2. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23398-7_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23398-7_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-23397-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-23398-7

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics