Skip to main content

The Dark Side Effect of Perceived Risk on Smoking Cessation: Exploring Two Contradicting Risk Dimensions

  • Conference paper
Marketing in Transition: Scarcity, Globalism, & Sustainability

Abstract

An understanding of consumer behaviour has been vital for any context in the marketing discipline. Particularly, in the case of health care marketing, the exploration of consumers’ risk-taking behaviour and decision making under uncertainty contributes to successful marketing efforts towards desirable health behaviours, such as smoking cessation. This paper examines the simultaneous, dual effect of perceived risk on smoking cessation intention by introducing a new framework of consumer behavioural intentions including two dimensions of perceived risk, the “risk not to quit” and the “risk to quit” smoking. The model is tested by means of a survey among adult smokers in Greece, using SEM. According to the research findings, the two dimensions of perceived risk have a direct, but contradicting to each other, effect on smoking cessation intention. This effect should be taken into account by practitioners, both health care organizations and companies that market substitutes for smoking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Avlonitou, E., Samartzis, L., Rigopoulou, A., Frantzeskaki, F. and P. Behrakis. 2003. “Evaluation of smoking habits in students of the Athens Medical School”. Pneumon 16 (2): 314-321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, D. G., Byrne, A. E. and M. I. Reinhart. 1995. “Personality, stress and the decision to commence cigarette smoking in adolescence”. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 39 (1): 53-62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 2001. “Youth tobacco surveillance – United States 2000”. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 50 (4) – cited in Kim, 2006

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P. T. Jr. and R. R. McCrae. 1981. “Stress, smoking motives and psychological well-being: the illusory benefits of smoking”. Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy, 3: 125-150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dardis, R. and T. Keane. 1995. Risk-benefit analysis of cigarette smoking: public policy implications. The Journal of Consumer Affairs 29 (2): 351-367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dijk, F., de Nooijer, J., Heinrich, E. and H. de Vries. 2007. “Adolescents’ vies on smoking, quitting and health education”. Health Education 107 (2): 114-125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Droomers, M., Schrijvers, C. T. M. and J. P. Mackenbach. 2004. “Educational differences in the intention to stop smoking”. European Journal of Public Health 14 (2): 194-198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E. and R. L. Tatham. 1995. Multivariate Data Analysis: with readings. Englewood Cliffs London: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E. and R. L. Tatham 2006. Multivariate Data Analysis (6th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson- Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L. and P. M. Bentler. 1999. “Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives”. Structural Equation Modelling 6: 1-55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamenidou, E., Priporas, K. B. and K. Galanopoulos. 2004. “Why students smoke: implementation of factor analysis”. Hellenic Statistical Institute – Proceedings of the 17 th Panellenic Conference of Statistics: 217-224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y. J. 2006. “The role of regulatory focus in message framing in antismoking advertisements for adolescents”. Journal of Advertising 35 (1): 143-151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, K. and B. Lloyd. 1999. “Adolescent smoking: the control of mood and body image concerns”. Health Education 1: 17-26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinley Health Center. 2007. Smoking Cessation Questionnaire. Retrieved from: http://www.mckinley.uiuc.edu/Handouts/pdfs/smoking_cessation_questionnaire.pdf (as seen on 30-11-2007).

  • Minor, M. and J. C. Mowen. 1998. Consumer Behaviour (5th ed.). N. Jersey: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pechmann C., Zhao G., Goldberg M. E. and E. T. Reibling. 2003. “What to Convey in Antismoking Advertisements for Adolescents: The Use of Protection Motivation Theory to Identify Effective Message Themes”. Journal of Marketing 67:1-18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rindfleisch, A. and D. X. Crockett. 1999. “Cigarette smoking and perceived risk: a multidimensional investigation”, Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 18 (2): 159-171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strong, C. A. and E. Sidira. 2006. “The influence of family and friends on teenage smoking in Greece: some preliminary findings”. Marketing Intelligence and Planning. 24 (2): 119-126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi, Kip W. 1991. “Age variations in risk perceptions and smoking decisions”. The Review of Economics and Statistics. 73 (4): 577-588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheaton, B., Muthen, B., Alwin, D. F. and G. F. Summers. 1977. “Assessing reliability and stability in panel models”. In Sociological Methodology. Ed. Heise, D.R.. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willemsen, M. C. 2005. “The new E.U. cigarette health warnings benefit smokers who want to quit the habit: results from the Dutch continuous survey of smoking habits”. European Journal of Public Health, 15 (4): 389-392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Academy of Marketing Science

About this paper

Cite this paper

Chaniotakis, I.E., Soureli, M., Valakas, I., Lymperopoulos, C. (2015). The Dark Side Effect of Perceived Risk on Smoking Cessation: Exploring Two Contradicting Risk Dimensions. In: Campbell, C. (eds) Marketing in Transition: Scarcity, Globalism, & Sustainability. Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18687-0_30

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics