Skip to main content

Product Involvement, Cognitive Dissonance and Product Satisfaction: An Experimental Study

  • Conference paper
Proceedings of the 1982 Academy of Marketing Science (AMS) Annual Conference

Abstract

The understanding of consumers’ satisfaction with a product/service has become an important topic in consumer behavior research. Past experimental research in this area is based on explanations offered by cognitive dissonance theory. This experimental study points out methodological problems in the past experimental research. Theoretical and managerial implications are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Robert P. AbeIson, Elliot Aronson, William J. McGulre, Theodore M. Newcomb, Milton J. Rosenberg, and Percy H. Tannenbaum, eds., Theories of Cognitive Consistency: A Sourcebook (Chicago: Rand McNally, 1968), 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ralph E. Anderson, “Consumer Dissatisfaction: The Effect of Discon-firmed Expectancy on Perceived Product Performance,” Journal of Marketing Research. 10 (1973), 38–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerald D. Bell, “The Automobile Buyer After the Purchase,” Journal of Marketing, 31 (1965), 12–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence Bowen and Steven H. Chaffee, “Product Involvement and Pertinent Advertising Appeals,” Journalism Quarterly, (1974), 613–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jack W. Brehm and Arthur R. Cohen, Explorations in Cognitive Dissonance (New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1962).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Richard N. Cardozo, “An Experimental Study of Customer Effort, Expectation, and Satisfaction,” Journal of Marketing Research, 2 (1965), 244–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joel B. Cohen and Marvin E. Goldberg, “The Dissonance Model in Post-Decision Product Evaluation,” Journal of Marketing Research. 7 (1970), 315–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • William H. Cummings and M. Venkatesan, “Cognitive Dissonance and Consumer Behavior: A Review of the Evidence,” Journal of Marketing Research, 13 (1976), 303–08.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. M. Donnelly and J. M. Ivancevich, “Post-Purchase Reinforcement and Back-Out Behavior,” Journal of Marketing Research. 7 (1970), 399–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James F. Engel, “Are Automobile Purchasers Dissonant Consumers?", Journal of Marketing. 27 (1963), 55–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shel Feldman, ed., Cognitive Consistency: Motivational Antecedents and Behavioral Consequences (New York: Academic Press, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • Leon Festinger, A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance (Stanford CA; Stanford University Press, 1957).

    Google Scholar 

  • —ed., Conflict, Decision, and Dissonance (Stanford CA: Stanford University Press, 1964).

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnathan L. Freedman, “Involvement, Discrepancy and Change,” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 69 (1964), 290–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • H. J. Greenwald, “The Basic Assumptions of Dissonance Theory,” Psychological Reports. (1968), 888.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelby D. Hunt, “Post Transaction Communications and Dissonance Reduction,” Journal of Marketing, 31 (1970), 39–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harold H. Kassarjian and Joel B. Cohen, “Cognitive Dissonance and Consumer Behavior: Reactions to the Surgeon General’s Report on Smoking and Health,” California Management Review, 8 (1965), 55–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradeep K. korgaonkar, “An Experimental Study of Product Satisfaction, Product Importance, Expectations, and Performance,” an unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, (Atlanta GA: Georgia State University, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  • H. E. krugman, “The Impact of Television Advertising: Learning Without Involvement,” Public Opinion Quarterly, 29 (1965), 349–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, “Temporary Effects of Communication,” Journal of Advertising Research, 10 (1970), 15–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • John L. Lastovicka and Dana M. Gardner, “Components of Involvement,” in Attitude Research Plays for High Stakes, John C. Malsney, ed. (Chicago: American Marketing Association, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  • Richard L. Oliver, “Effect of Expectation and Disconfirmation of Postexposure Product Evaluations: An Alternative Interpretation,” Journal of Applied Psychology. 62 (1979), 480–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richard W. Olshavsky and John A. Miller, “Consumer Expectations, Product Performance, and Perceived Product Quality,” Journal of Marketing Research, 9 (1972), 19–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jerry C. Olson and Philip Dover, “Disconfirmation of Consumer Expectations Through Product Trial,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 64 (1979), 179–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michael L. Ray, “Marketing Communication and the Hierarchy of Effects,” in New Models for Mass Communications Research, P. Clark, ed. (Beverly Hills CA: Sage Publications, Inc., 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas S. Robertson, “Low Commitment and Consumer Behavior,” Journal of Advertising Research, 16 (1976), 19–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muzafer Sherif and Carl I. Hovland, Social Judgement: Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Communication and Attitude Change (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1961).

    Google Scholar 

  • Robert A. Westbrook, “Intrapersonal Affective Influences on Consumer Satisfaction with Products,” Journal of Consumer Research, 7(1) (1980), 49–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arch G. Woodside, “Positive Disconfirmation and Expectation and the Effect of Effort on Evaluation,” Proceedings, 80th Annual Convention, American Psychological Association, (1972),

    Google Scholar 

  • "Foreign Mystique,” The Wall Street Journal. Dow Jones and Company, (March 20, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Academy of Marketing Science

About this paper

Cite this paper

Korgaonkar, P.K., Parameswaran, R. (2015). Product Involvement, Cognitive Dissonance and Product Satisfaction: An Experimental Study. In: Kothari, V. (eds) Proceedings of the 1982 Academy of Marketing Science (AMS) Annual Conference. Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16946-0_21

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics