Skip to main content

Deal Prone Consumers: A Comparative Profile of Coupon Users and Nonusers

  • Conference paper
Proceedings of the 1983 Academy of Marketing Science (AMS) Annual Conference

Abstract

This paper investigates the determinants of coupon use behavior by comparing coupon users and nonusers in terms of their sociodemographic characteristics and psycho-graphic orientations. Some differences in psychographic orientations emerged from which implications are drawn.

* The author gratefully acknowledges the support of the University of Petroleum & Minerals in this study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • W. O. Bearden, J. E. Teel and R. H. Williams, “Consumer Response to Cents-Off Coupons," in K. Bernhardt et al (eds.), The Changing Marketing Environment: New Theories and Applications (Chicago: American Marketing Association), 62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robert Blattberg, Thomas Buesing, Peter Peacock and Subrata Sen, “Identifying the Deal Prone Segment," Journal of Marketing Research (August, 1978), 369–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theodore Caplow, Middletown Families (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert A. Churchill, Jr., “A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs," Journal of Marketing Research (February, 1979), 64–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. E. Frank, W. F. Massey and Y. Wind, Market Segmentation (Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1972), 124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bud Frankel, “Tie Breakers’ Win: New Found Status," Advertising Age (October 6, 1980), S-9, S-13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwin C. Hackleman and Jacob M. Duker, “Deal Proneness and Heavy Usage: Merging Two Market Segmentation Criteria, “ Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (Fall, 1980), 332–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph H. Haire, Rolph E. Anderson, Ronald E. Tatham and Bernie J. Grablowsky, Multivariate Data Analysis (Tulsa: Petroleum Publishing Company, 1970), 88–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kevin Higgins, “Ambitious Spaghetti Pot Network Targets Working Woman Segment of Fast Food Market," Marketing News (January 8, 1982), 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph L. Mammola, The Human Side of Life in Muncie, Indiana (Muncie: Ball State University, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marketing News, “Coupon Distribution Shattered the 100 Billion …," (March 18, 1982), 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • William Nigut, Sr., “Is the Boom in Cents-Off Couponing Going to Burst?" Advertising Age (December 15, 1980), 41–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jon P. Noerager, “An Assessment of CAD-A Personality Instrument Developed Specifically for Marketing Research," Journal of Marketing Research (February, 1979) 53–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jum C. Nunnally, Psychometric Theory (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  • William D. Perrault and Hiram C. Barksdale, “Consumer Attitudes Toward Government Intervention and Marketing Practices: A Factor Analytic Approach," in Joseph F. Haire, Rolph E. Anderson, Ronald L. Tatham and Bernie J. Grablowsky, (eds.) Multivariate Data Analysis (Tulsa: Petroleum Publishing Company, 1979), 249–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Paul Peter, “Reliability: A Review of Psychometric Basics and Recent Marketing Practices," Journal of Marketing Research (February, 1979), 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Quera, Advertising Campaigns: Formulation and Tactics (Columbus, Ohio: Grid, Inc., 1973), 88–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • F. D. Reynolds and W. D. Wells, Consumer Behavior (New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jo-Ann Sbytniewski, “In Coupon and Refund Underground, Groceries are Home (Almost) Free," Progressive Grocer (July, 1979), 33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roger A. Strang, “Sales Promotion-Fast Growth, Faulty Management," Harvard Business Review (July-August, 1976), 116–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Nielsen Researcher, “Recent Trends in Couponing," (No. 4, 1979), 9–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Nielsen Researcher, “A Look at Sales Promotion," (No. 4, 1977), 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederick Webster, “The Deal Prone Consumer," Journal of Marketing Research (May, 1965), 186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ugur Yavas, Glen Riecken and Ravi Parameswaran, “Using Psychographics to Profile Potential Donors," Business (September-October, 1980), 41–45.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Academy of Marketing Science

About this paper

Cite this paper

Yavas, U. (2015). Deal Prone Consumers: A Comparative Profile of Coupon Users and Nonusers. In: Rogers III, J., Lamb, Jr., C. (eds) Proceedings of the 1983 Academy of Marketing Science (AMS) Annual Conference. Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16937-8_32

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics