Skip to main content

Part of the book series: International Law and Economics ((ILEC))

  • 936 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter illustrates the reasons that brought this study into being. It provides the reader with a preliminary understanding of the subject through a brief explanation of countries' obligations in the field of intellectual protection of plant varieties as required by the TRIPS Agreement; the need to adopt exceptions to patent rights for breeding purposes; and the relevance of the subject for policymaking and academic purposes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Please, note that least developed and developing countries have been granted a transitional period for implementing the TRIPS Agreement.

  2. 2.

    Correa (2012).

  3. 3.

    For a list of UPOV Members see UPOV (2014).

  4. 4.

    Louwaars et al. (2009) Nr. 14.

  5. 5.

    Please, note that lobbying activities were mainly undertaken by breeders of seed-propagated crops. Breeders of asexually reproduced plants, usually acting under CIOPORA, are against the introduction of a breeding exception to patent rights. Also note that the number of patents relevant for asexually propagated plants is very low.

  6. 6.

    Trojan (2012).

  7. 7.

    See the two letters of Ms Sharon A.M. Dijksma, Dutch Minister of Agriculture, dated 27 June 2013, Vergaderjaar 2012–2013, 33 365 (R1987) Nr. 6 and 28 June 2013, Vergaderjaar 2012–2013, 33 365 (R1987) Nr. 8.

  8. 8.

    For an extensive review of exceptions to patent rights see Bently et al. (2010).

  9. 9.

    Hantman (1985), p. 617; Eisenberg (1987), pp. 177 and 225; Eisenberg (1989), pp. 1017 and 1078; Gilat (1995), p. 44; Israelsen (1988–1989), pp. 457 and 469.

  10. 10.

    WT/DS/114/R.

References

  • Bently, L., Sherman, B., Barbosa, D. B., Grau-Kuntz, K., Basheer, S., & Visser, C., et al. (2010). Exclusions from patentability and exceptions and limitations to patentee’s rights. Geneva: WIPO Standing Committee on the Law of Patents, SCP/15/3, Annex 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Correa, C. (2012). TRIPS-related patent flexibilities and food security, options for developing countries, policy guide. Geneva: QUNO – ICTSD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, R. S. (1987). Proprietary rights and the norms of science in biotechnology research. Yale Law Journal, 97(2), 177, 225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, R. S. (1989). Patents and the progress of science: Exclusive rights and experimental use. University Chicago Law Review, 56, 1017, 1078.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilat, D. (1995). Experimental use and patents. In F. -K. Beier & G. Schricker (Eds.), IIC Studies in industrial property and copyright law (p. 44). The Max Planck Institute for Foreign and International Patent, Copyright and Competition Law, Vol. 16. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hantman, R. D. (1985). Experimental use as an exception to patent infringement. Journal of the Patent and the Trademark Office Society, 67, 617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Israelsen, N. A. (1988–1989). Making, using and selling without infringing: An examination of 35 U.S.C. Sec. 271 and the experimental use exception to patent infringement. American Intellectual Property Law Association Quarterly Journal, 16, 457, 469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louwaars, N., Dons, H., van Overwalle, G., Raven, H., Arundel, A., & Eaton, D., et al. (2009–2014). Breeding business. The future of plant breeding in the light of developments in patent rights and plant breeder’s rights. CGN Report 2009–2014, Centre for Genetic Resources, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trojan, C. G. (2012, July 31). Problem-solving approaches to the issue of the overlap between patent law and breeders’ rights in the plant breeding sector. Report submitted to the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs, Agriculture and Innovation.

    Google Scholar 

  • UPOV. (2014). Members of the international union for the protection of new varieties of plants. As updated on 10 June 2014. http://www.upov.int/export/sites/upov/members/en/pdf/pub423.pdf. Accessed 6 Dec 2014.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Prifti, V. (2015). Setting the Background. In: The Breeder's Exception to Patent Rights. International Law and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15771-9_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics