Skip to main content

Part of the book series: International Law and Economics ((ILEC))

  • 950 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter aims at making the reader familiar with the object of study and structure of the book. To this purpose, it briefly illustrates the importance of plant breeding for society and it points to the role of intellectual property rights in plant variety production as well as the importance of legal and economic aspects in analyzing the topic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For an understanding see the website of ISF (International Seed Federation), http://www.worldseed.org/isf/what_we_do.html, accessed 21 December 2014. Acquaah (2012), pp. 1–40 and Schlegel (2007), pp. 5–42.

  2. 2.

    Please, note that the data do not include all type of commercialized varieties of seed. See in particular the data related to national imports and exports. ISF, http://www.worldseed.org/isf/seed_statistics.html, accessed 21 December 2014.

  3. 3.

    For detailed figures see FAO, IFAD and WFP (2014), pp. 8–12.

  4. 4.

    Ibidem, pp. 14–20.

  5. 5.

    See Chap. 3 for more explanations.

  6. 6.

    Campi (2014), pp. 4–6; Kesan (2007), p. xvii.

  7. 7.

    For more explanations on IPRs applicable to plant varieties, please see Chap. 4.

  8. 8.

    For an understanding see Merges (2011).

  9. 9.

    For Germany see section 11.2.b of the Patent Act adopted in 2005; For France, article L. 613-5-3 of the Code de la Propriété Intellectuelle adopted in 2004, and for Switzerland, Article 9 (e) of the Federal Act on Patents for Inventions, adopted in 2008. The Netherlands adopted the same exception in 2013 which entered into force in 2014. See Article 53.2.b of the Dutch Patent Act. This exception has also been included in article 27.c) of the recent Agreement on a Unified Patent Court (AUPC), (2013/C 175/01). Note that 13 ratifications including Germany, France, and United Kingdom are required for the Agreement to enter into force. As per now, only six countries have ratified it: http://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/documents-publications/agreements-conventions/agreement/?aid=2013001, accessed 20 May 2015.

  10. 10.

    Trojan (2012). Based on Trojan’s report, this exception will be often termed as ‘breeding exception’ in the following pages.

  11. 11.

    Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, April 15, 1994, Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization, Annex 1C, The Legal Texts: The Results of The Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations 320 (1999), 1869 U.N.T.S. 299, 33 I.L.M. 1197 (1994) (hereinafter TRIPS Agreement).

  12. 12.

    International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants, Paris, 2 December 1961, as revised at Geneva on 10 November 1972, 23 October 1978, and 19 March 1991 (Geneva: UPOV. UPOV Doc. 221 (E), 1996).

  13. 13.

    WT/DS/114R.

  14. 14.

    See Annex for a list of the interviewees.

  15. 15.

    The doctrine has been mainly developed for copyright exceptions. See Kur (2011), pp. 208–261; Senftleben (2004), p. 407.

References

  • Acquaah, G. (2012). Principles of plant genetics and breeding. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campi, M. (2014). Protecting plants, incentives to innovate and access to biological resources. A historical overview (pp. 4–6). Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna: LEM. Available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2478312. Accessed 22 Dec 2014.

  • FAO, IFAD, & WFP. (2014). The State of Food Insecurity in the World 2014. Strengthening the enabling environment for food security and nutrition. FAO: Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kesan, J. P. (2007). Seeds of change: A link among the legal, economic and agricultural biotechnology communities. In J. P. Kesan (Ed.), Agricultural biotechnology and intellectual property: Seeds of change (pp. xvii–xxx). Cambridge (MA): CABI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kur, A. (2011). Limitations and exceptions under the three-step-test – How much room to walk in the middle ground? In A. Kur & M. Levin (Eds.), Intellectual property rights in a fair world system. Proposals for reform for TRIPS (pp. 208–261). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merges, R. (2011). Justifying intellectual property. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senftleben, M. (2004). Copyright, limitations and the three-step test. An analysis of the three-step test in international and EC copyright law. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlegel, R. H. J. (2007). Concise encyclopedia of crop improvement. New York: Haworth Food & Agricultural Products Press: Crop Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trojan, C. G. (2012, July 31). Problem-solving approaches to the issue of the overlap between patent law and breeders’ rights in the plant breeding sector. Report submitted to the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs, Agriculture and Innovation.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Prifti, V. (2015). Introduction. In: The Breeder's Exception to Patent Rights. International Law and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15771-9_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics