Advertisement

Challenges in Variable Resolution Simulations of Separated Flow Over Delta Wings

  • Jacob M. CooperEmail author
  • Sharath S. Girimaji
Conference paper
Part of the Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics and Multidisciplinary Design book series (NNFM, volume 130)

Abstract

Variable-resolution simulations of a \(50^{\circ }\) swept, sharp leading edge, delta wing are performed at low Reynolds number using the Unsteady Reynolds Averaged Navier Stokes (URANS) and Partially Averaged Navier Stokes (PANS) turbulence models. The study focuses on the ability of the models to capture the vortex structure both forward and aft of vortex breakdown. A challenging aspect of the flow is that the pre-breakdown vortex is nearly laminar, and turbulent flow appears only after breakdown occurs near mid-chord. If the upstream resolution is adequate to resolve all laminar features, then both URANS and PANS reasonably capture the large scale features of the flow in the downstream region. It is found that inadequate resolution in the mostly laminar forward vortex leads to poor simulation of the aft vortex and aft flow features irrespective of the model fidelity.

Keywords

Direct Numerical Simulation Coarse Grid Primary Vortex Vortex Breakdown Delta Wing 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Hummel, D.: On the vortex formation over a slender delta wing at large angles of incidence. Technical Report 15, Technische Universitat Braunschweig (1978)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Levin, D., Katz, J.: Dynamic load measurements with delta wings undergoing self-induced roll oscillations. J. Aircr. 21(1), 30–36 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Soemarwoto, B.I., Boelens, O.J.: Simulation of vortical flow over a slender delta wing experiencing vortex breakdown. Technical report NLR-TP-2003-396, National Aerospace Laboratory NLR (2003)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Luckring, J.M.: Reynolds number, compressibility, and leading-edge bluntness effects on delta-wing aerodynamics. In: 24th International Congress of the Aeronautical Sciences, Hampton, VA (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gordiner, R.E., Visbal, M.R.: Higher-order compact difference scheme applied to the simulation of a low sweep delta wing flow. In: 41st Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Germano, M.: Turbulence: The Filtering Approach. Technical report, The Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1972)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Girimaji, S.S., Abdol-Hamid, K.S.: Partially-averaged Navier Stokes model for turbulence: implementation and validation. Number AIAA 2005–502. In: 43rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Girimaji, S.S.: Partially-averaged Navier-Stokes method for turbulence: a reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes to direct numerical simulation bridging method. J. Appl. Mech. 73, 413–421 (2006)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lakshmipathy, S.: PANS method for turbulence: simulations of high and low reynolds number flows past a circular cylinder. Master’s thesis, Texas A&M University (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Murthi, A.: Effect of turbulent transport models and grid spacing on PANS calculations of a id-driven Cavity. Master’s thesis, Texas A&M University (2004)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Song, C., Park, S.: Numerical simulation of flow past a square cylinder using partially-averaged Navier-Stokes model. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 97, 37–47 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Girimaji, S.S., Jeong, E., Srinivasan, R.: Partially averaged Navier-Stokes method for turbulence: fixed point analysis and comparison with unsteady partially averaged Navier-Stokes. J. Appl. Mech. 73, 422–429 (2006)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lakshmipathy, S., Girimaji, S.S.: Partially averaged Navier-Stokes: PANS method for turbulence simulations: flow past a circular cylinder. J. Fluids Eng. 132, 121202 (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Texas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA

Personalised recommendations