Advertisement

Language Learning Strategies: A Theoretical Backdrop

  • Olga Trendak
Chapter
Part of the Second Language Learning and Teaching book series (SLLT)

Abstract

The 1970s saw a certain change in the attitude toward language teaching and toward the learner. Stress was laid on the communicative aspect of teaching a language but also on the learner and their contribution to learning the target language. This approach was clearly visible in a study conducted by Rubin (1975) who wanted to investigate the strategies deployed by the Good Language Learner (GLL). The results of her project engendered great interest in strategies applied by learners. Researchers started to perceive the learner as a very valuable source of information that could reveal a great deal about the processes involved in learning a language. Thus, within the last few decades one could observe an upsurge of interest in learner autonomy and in the good language learner and language learning strategies. The first tendency is believed to have originated in Europe, whereas the second one in the USA. The strong interest in the area of LLS and their role in second language acquisition, as some researchers believe, stems from the need to identify the features of an effective learner (O’Malley and Chamot 1990). Researchers wanted to know what better learners did and what learning behaviours they engaged in that helped them surpass weaker learners (Rubin 1975, 1981; Naiman et al. 1978; Reiss 1983, 1985; Gillette 1987; Lennon 1989). Initially, though, it was believed that analyzing the teaching methods would be enough to find out why some learners are better than others. However, research into the teaching methods failed to point at the best method and the one that would ensure success when learning another language (Droździał-Szelest 1997).

Keywords

Learning Strategy Foreign Language Language Learning Target Language Learning Style 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Anderson, J. (1981). Cognitive skills and their acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, J. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, J. (1985). Cognitive psychology and its implications. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
  4. Atkinson, R. C., & Raugh, M. R. (1975). An application of the mnemonic keyword method to the acquisition of Russian vocabulary. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 104, 126–133.Google Scholar
  5. Bedell, D. (1993). Chinese data on EFL strategy use among university students (Unpublished Manuscript). University of Alabama, USA.Google Scholar
  6. Bedell, D. A., & Oxford, R. (1996). Cross-cultural comparisons of language learning strategies in the People’s Republic of China and other countries. In R. Oxford (Ed.), Language learning strategies around the world: Cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 47–60). Manoa: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bialystok, E. (1981). The role of conscious strategies in second language proficiency. The Modern Language Journal, 65, 24–35.Google Scholar
  8. Bialystok, E. (1985). The compatibility of teaching and learning strategies. Applied Linguistics, 6, 255–262.Google Scholar
  9. Bialystok, E., & Fröhlich, M. (1977). Aspects of second language learning in classroom settings. Working Papers in Bilingualism, 13, 1–26.Google Scholar
  10. Bialystok, E., & Fröhlich, M. (1978). Variables of classroom achievement in second language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 62, 327–36.Google Scholar
  11. Bielska, J. (2006). Between psychology and foreign language learning. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.Google Scholar
  12. Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P. R., & Zeidner, M. (2000). Handbook on self-regulation. San Diego: Academic.Google Scholar
  13. Brown, H. D. (1991). Breaking the language barrier. Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press.Google Scholar
  14. Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching. White Plains, NJ: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  15. Carroll, J. (1981). Twenty-five years of research on foreign language aptitude. In K. C. Diller (Ed.), Individual differences and universals in language learning aptitude (pp. 83–118). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
  16. Carter, E. (1988). The relationship of field dependent/independent cognitive style to Spanish language achievement and proficiency: A preliminary report. The Modern Language Journal, 72, 21–30.Google Scholar
  17. Chamot, A. U., O’Malley, J., Kűpper, L., & Impink-Hernandez, M. (1987). A study of learning strategies in foreign language instruction: First year report. Rosslyn, VA: Interstate Research Associates.Google Scholar
  18. Chapelle, C. A. (1983). The relationship between ambiguity tolerance and success in acquiring English as a second language in adult learners (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Illinois, USA.Google Scholar
  19. Chapelle, C., & Roberts, C. (1986). Ambiguity tolerance and field independence as predictors of proficiency in English as a second language. Language Learning, 36, 27–45.Google Scholar
  20. Cohen, A. D. (1984). Studying second language learning strategies: How do we get the information? Applied Linguistics, 5, 101–112.Google Scholar
  21. Cohen, A. D. (1998). Strategies in learning and using a second language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  22. D’Anglejan, A., & Renaud, C. (1985). Learner characteristics and second language acquisition: A multivariate study of adult immigrants and some thoughts on methodology. Language Learning, 35, 1–19.Google Scholar
  23. Day, R. R. (1984). Student participation in the ESL classroom or some imperfections in practice. Language Learner, 34, 69–101.Google Scholar
  24. Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  25. Dörnyei, Z., & Skehan, P. (2003). Individual differences in second language learning. In C. Doughty & M. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 589–630). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  26. Dreyer, C., & Oxford, R. (1996). Learning strategies and other predictors of ESL proficiency among Afrikaans speakers in South Africa. In R. Oxford (Ed.), Language learning strategies around the world: Cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 61–74). Manoa: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
  27. Droździał-Szelest, K. (1997). Language learning strategies in the process of acquiring a foreign language. Poznań: Motivex.Google Scholar
  28. Ehrman, M. (1990). The role of personality type in adult language learning: An ongoing investigation. In T. Parry & C. Stansfield (Eds.), Language aptitude reconsidered (pp. 67–125). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  29. Ehrman, M., & Oxford, R. (1989). Effects of sex differences, career choice, and psychological type on adult language learning strategies. The Modern Language Journal, 73, 1–13.Google Scholar
  30. Ehrman, M., & Oxford, R. (1990). Adult language learning styles and strategies in an intensive training setting. The Modern Language Journal, 74, 311–327.Google Scholar
  31. Ehrman, M., & Oxford, R. (1995). Cognition plus: Correlates of adult language proficiency. The Modern Language Journal, 79, 67–89.Google Scholar
  32. Ellis, R. (1985). Understanding second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Ely, C. (1989). Tolerance of ambiguity and use of second language strategies. Foreign Language Annals, 22, 437–445.Google Scholar
  35. Eysenck, H. J. (1965). Fact and fiction in psychology. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  36. Eysenck, H. J. (1970). The structure of human personality. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  37. Farquharson, M. (1989). Learning styles of Arab students in EFL classrooms. Paper presented at the 23rd meeting of International Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages, San Antonio, TX, March 7–11.Google Scholar
  38. Gao, X. (2010). Strategic language learning: The roles of agency and context. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  39. Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
  40. Gardner, R. C., & MacIntyre, P. D. (1992). A student’s contribution to second language learning: Part I, cognitive factors. Language Teaching, 25, 211–20.Google Scholar
  41. Gardner, R. C., & MacIntyre, P. D. (1993). A student’s contribution to second language learning: Part II, affective factors. Language Teaching, 26, 1–11.Google Scholar
  42. Genessee, F., & Hamayan, E. (1980). Individual differences in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 1, 95–110.Google Scholar
  43. Gillette, B. (1987). Two successful language learners: An introspective report. In C. Færch & G. Kasper (Eds.), Introspection in second language research (pp. 267–279). Philadelphia, PA: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  44. Goh, C. C. M., & Foong, K. P. (1997). Chinese ESL students’ learning strategies: A look at frequency, proficiency and gender. Hong Kong Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2, 39–53.Google Scholar
  45. Green, J. M., & Oxford, R. (1995). A closer look at learning strategies, L2 proficiency and gender. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 261–297.Google Scholar
  46. Griffiths, C. (2003). Patterns of language learning strategy use. System, 31, 367–383.Google Scholar
  47. Gu, P. (2005). Learning strategies: Prototypical core and dimensions of variation. Unpublished manuscript. Victoria University of Wellington.Google Scholar
  48. Gu, P. (2010). Advance review: A new book on Teaching and researching language learning strategies. Unpublished review, Wellington University, NZ.Google Scholar
  49. Hashim, R., & Sahil, S. (1994). Examining learners’ language learning strategies. RELC Journal, 25, 1–20.Google Scholar
  50. Hatch, E. (1974). Second language learning universals? Working Papers on Bilingualism, 3, 1–17.Google Scholar
  51. Horwitz, E. K. (1988). The beliefs about language learning of beginning university foreign language students. The Modern Language Journal, 72, 283–294.Google Scholar
  52. Horwitz, E. K., & Young, D. J. (1991). Language anxiety. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  53. James, B. G. (1984). Business wargames. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  54. Keefe, J. W. (1979). Learning style: An overview. In J. W. Keefe (Ed.), Student learning styles: Diagnosing and prescribing programs (pp. 1–17). Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals.Google Scholar
  55. Ku, P. Y. N. (1997, April). Predictors of strategy choice by EFL students in Taiwan. Paper presented at RELC Seminar, Singapore.Google Scholar
  56. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
  57. Lennon, P. (1989). Introspection and intentionality in advanced second-language acquisition. Language Learning, 39, 375–395.Google Scholar
  58. Maccoby, E. E., & Jacklin, C. (1974). The psychology of sex differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  59. MacIntyre, P. D. (1994). Toward a social psychological model of strategy use. Foreign Language Annals, 27, 185–195.Google Scholar
  60. Marrie, B., & Nettan, J. E. (1991). Communication strategies. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 47, 442–62.Google Scholar
  61. Mochizuki, A. (1999). Language learning strategies used by Japanese university students. RELC Journal, 30, 101–113.Google Scholar
  62. Mullins, P. (1992). Successful English language learning strategies of students enrolled in the Faculty of Arts, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). United States International University, USAGoogle Scholar
  63. Naiman, N., Fröhlich, M., Stern, H., & Todesco, A. (1978). The good language learner. A report. Research in Education Series 7. The Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.Google Scholar
  64. Nation, R., & McLaughlin, B. (1986). Experts and novices: An information-processing approach to the “good language learner” problem. Applied Psycholinguistics, 7, 41–56.Google Scholar
  65. Nelson, K. (1973). Structure and strategy in learning to talk. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 38, 1–135.Google Scholar
  66. Nisbet, D. L., Tindall, E. R., & Arroyo, A. A. (2005). Language learning strategies and English proficiency of Chinese university students. Foreign Language Annals, 38, 100–107.Google Scholar
  67. Norton, B., & Toohey, K. (2001). Changing perspectives on good language learners. TESOL Quarterly, 35, 307–322.Google Scholar
  68. Nyikos, M. (1990). Sex-related differences in adult language learning: Socialization and memory factors. The Modern Language Journal, 74, 274–87.Google Scholar
  69. O’Malley, J., & Chamot, A. U. (1988). How to teach learning strategies. In A. U. Chamot, J. M. O’Malley, & L. Kűpper (Eds.), The cognitive academic language learning approach (CALLA) training manual (pp. 121–122). Arlington, VA: Second Language Learning.Google Scholar
  70. O’Malley, J., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  71. O’Malley, J., Chamot, A., Stewner-Manzanares, G., Kűpper, L., & Russo, R. (1985a). Learning strategies used by beginning and intermediate ESL students. Language Learning, 35, 21–46.Google Scholar
  72. O’Malley, J., Chamot, A. U., Stewner-Manzanares, G., & Kűpper, L. (1985b). Learning strategy applications with students of English as a second language. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 557–584.Google Scholar
  73. Oxford, R. (1989). Use of language learning strategies: A synthesis of studies with implications for strategy training. System, 17, 255–267.Google Scholar
  74. Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.Google Scholar
  75. Oxford, R. (1993a). Instructional implications of gender differences in language learning styles and strategies. Applied Language Learning, 4, 65–94.Google Scholar
  76. Oxford, R. (1993b). La difference continue…: Gender differences in second/foreign language learning styles and strategies. In J. Sutherland (Ed.), Exploring gender (pp. 140–147). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  77. Oxford, R. (1994). Gender differences in strategies and styles for L2 learning: What is the significance? Should we pay attention? In J. E. Alatis (Ed.), Theory and practice of strategies in second language acquisition (pp. 541–557). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  78. Oxford, R., & Burry-Stock, J. A. (1995). Assessing the use of language learning strategies worldwide with the ESL/EFL version of the Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL). System, 23, 1–23.Google Scholar
  79. Oxford, R., & Crookall, D. (1989). Research on language learning strategies: Methods, findings, and instructional issues. The Modern Language Journal, 73, 404–419.Google Scholar
  80. Oxford, R., & Green, J. M. (1995). Comments on Virginia LoCastro’s “Learning strategies and learning environments”. Making sense of learning strategy assessment: Towards a higher standard of research accuracy. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 166–171.Google Scholar
  81. Oxford, R., & Nyikos, M. (1989). Variables affecting choice of language learning strategies by university students. The Modern Language Journal, 73, 291–300.Google Scholar
  82. Park, G. P. (1994). Language learning strategies: Why do adults need them? Manuscript. University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
  83. Park, G. P. (1997). Language learning strategies and English proficiency in Korean University students. Foreign Language Annals, 30, 211–222.Google Scholar
  84. Pask, G., & Scott, B. (1972). Learning strategies and individual competence. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 4, 217–53.Google Scholar
  85. Pavičić Takač, V. (2008). Vocabulary learning strategies and foreign language acquisition. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  86. Pawlak, M. (2006). The place of form focused instruction in the foreign language classroom. Kalisz-Poznań: Wydawnictwo WPA UAM.Google Scholar
  87. Pawlak, M. (2009a). New perspectives on individual differences in language learning and teaching. Poznań-Kalisz: Wydawnictwo UAM.Google Scholar
  88. Pawlak, M. (2011b). Anxiety as a factor influencing the use of language learning strategies. In M. Pawlak (Ed.), Extending the boundaries of research on second language learning and teaching (pp. 149–165). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  89. Pawlak, M. (2011d). Research into language learning strategies: Taking stock and looking ahead. In J. Arabski & A. Wojtaszek (Eds.), Individual learner differences in SLA (pp. 17–37). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  90. Peacock, M. (2001). Language learning strategies and EAP proficiency: Teacher views, student views, and test results. In J. Flowerdew & M. Peacock (Eds.), Research perspectives on English for academic purposes (pp. 268–285). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  91. Peacock, M., & Ho, B. (2003). Student language learning strategies across eight disciplines. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13, 179–200.Google Scholar
  92. Politzer, R. L. (1983). An exploratory study of self-reported language learning behaviours and their relation to achievement. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 6, 54–68.Google Scholar
  93. Politzer, R. L., & McGroarty, M. (1985). An exploratory study of learning behaviours and their relationship to gains in linguistic and communicative competence. TESOL Quarterly, 9, 103–123.Google Scholar
  94. Reid, J. (1987). The learning style preferences of ESL students. TESOL Quarterly, 21, 87–111.Google Scholar
  95. Reiss, M. A. (1983). Helping the unsuccessful language learner. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 39, 257–266.Google Scholar
  96. Reiss, M. A. (1985). The good language learner: Another look. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 41, 511–523.Google Scholar
  97. Riley, L., & Harsch, K. (1999). Enhancing the learning experience with strategy journals: Supporting the diverse learning styles of ESL/EFL students. In Proceedings of the HERDSA Annual International Conference, 13 July 1999 (pp. 1–18). Retrieved from http://herdsa.org.au/vic/cornerstones/pdf/Riley.PDF
  98. Rong, M. (1999). Language learning strategies of a sample of tertiary-level students in the P.R. China. Guidelines, 21, 1–11.Google Scholar
  99. Rossi-Le, L. (1989). Perceptual learning style preferences and their relationship to language learning strategies in adult students of English as a second language (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Drake University, USA.Google Scholar
  100. Rost, M., & Ross, S. (1991). Learner use of strategies in interaction: Typology and Teachability. Language Learning, 41, 235–73.Google Scholar
  101. Rubin, J. (1975). What the “Good Language Learner” can teach us. TESOL Quarterly, 9, 41–51.Google Scholar
  102. Rubin, J. (1981). The study of cognitive processes in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 2, 117–131.Google Scholar
  103. Rubin, J. (1987). Learner strategies: Theoretical assumptions, research history and typology. In A. Wenden & J. Rubin (Eds.), Learner strategies in language learning (pp. 15–30). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  104. Scarcella, R. C., & Oxford, R. (1992). The tapestry of language learning: The individual in the communicative classroom. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.Google Scholar
  105. Seliger, H. (1977). Does practice make perfect? A study of the interaction patterns and L2 competence. Language Learning, 27, 263–78.Google Scholar
  106. Seliger, H. (1984). Processing universals in second language acquisition. In F. R. Eckham, L. H. Bell, & D. Nelson (Eds.), Universals of second language acquisition (pp. 36–47). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
  107. Shmais, W. A. (2003). Language learning strategy use in Palestine. TESL-EJ 7, A–3.Google Scholar
  108. Siegel, J. (2003). Social context. In C. Doughty & M. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 178–224). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  109. Skehan, P. (1989). Individual differences in second-language learning. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
  110. Stern, H. H. (1983). Fundamental concepts of language teaching. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
  111. Sy, B. M. (1994). Sex differences and language learning strategies. In Papers from the Eleventh Conference on English Teaching and Learning in the Republic of China (pp. 19–51). Taipei: The Crane Publishing.Google Scholar
  112. Takeuchi, O. (2003). What can we learn from good language learners? A qualitative study in the Japanese foreign language context. System, 31, 313–432.Google Scholar
  113. Takeuchi, O., Griffiths, C., & Coyle, D. (2007). Applying strategies to contexts: The role of individual, situational and group differences. In A. D. Cohen & E. Macaro (Eds.), Language learner strategies (pp. 69–92). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  114. Tarone, E. (1980). Communication strategies, foreigner talk, and repair in interlanguage. Language Learning, 30, 417–431.Google Scholar
  115. Tarone, E. (1981). Some thoughts on the notion of communication strategy. TESOL Quarterly, 15, 285–295.Google Scholar
  116. Tran, T. V. (1988). Sex differences in English language acculturation and learning strategies among Vietnamese adults aged 40 and over in the United States. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 19, 747–758.Google Scholar
  117. Tseng, W.-T., Dörnyei, Z., & Schmitt, N. (2006). A new approach to assessing strategic learning: The case of self-regulation in vocabulary acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 27, 78–102.Google Scholar
  118. Tucker, G., Hamayan, E., & Genessee, F. (1976). Affective cognitive and social factors in second language acquisition. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 32, 214–16.Google Scholar
  119. Victori, M., & Tragant. E. (2003). Learner strategies: A cross-sectional and longitudinal study of primary and high-school EFL teachers. In M. P. Garcia Mayo, & M. P. Garcia, Lecumberri (Eds.), Age and the acquisition of English as a foreign language (pp. 182–208). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  120. Wakamoto, N. (2000). Language learning strategy and personality variables: Focusing on extroversion and introversion. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 38, 71–81.Google Scholar
  121. Watanabe, Y. (1990). External variables affecting language learner strategies of Japanese EFL learners: Effects of entrance examination, years spent at college/university, and staying overseas. (Unpublished M.A. thesis). Lancaster University, UK.Google Scholar
  122. Weinstein, C., & Mayer, R. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 315–327). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  123. Wenden, A. (1986). Helping language learners think about learning. ELT Journal, 40, 3–12.Google Scholar
  124. Wenden, A. (1987). Incorporating learner training in the classroom. In A. Wenden & J. Rubin (Eds.), Learner strategies in language learning (pp. 159–168). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  125. Wharton, G. (2000). Language learning strategy use of bilingual foreign language learners in Singapore. Language Learning, 50, 203–243.Google Scholar
  126. Willing, K. (1987). Learning styles and migrant education. Adelaide: National Curriculum Resource Centre.Google Scholar
  127. Witkin, H. A. (1962). Psychological differentiation. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  128. Witkin, H. A., Oltman, P. K., Raskin, E., & Karp, S. A. (1971). A manual for the embedded figures test. Palo Alto, CA: California Consulting Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  129. Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational Psychologist, 25, 3–17.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Olga Trendak
    • 1
  1. 1.Zakład Języka Angielskiego i Językoznawstwa Stosowanego Wydział Filologiczny UŁUniversity of ŁódźŁódźPoland

Personalised recommendations