Skip to main content

Lexico-Grammatical Development in Secondary Education CLIL Learners

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Content-based Language Learning in Multilingual Educational Environments

Part of the book series: Educational Linguistics ((EDUL,volume 23))

Abstract

Research on the impact of immersion programmes on second language acquisition has generally shown benefits in comprehension and fluency, while lexico-grammatical accuracy has been found to lag behind. Nevertheless, empirical evidence on the development of lexico-grammatical competence in CLIL contexts is still scanty. Thus, the current study intends to shed new light on the growth of lexico-grammatical accuracy in lower secondary education CLIL learners. More specifically, it reports on two groups of Catalan-Spanish bilinguals (N = 105) in the Balearic Islands enrolled in year 2 at the start of the study (ages 13–14): (a) CLIL participants learning either science or social science through the medium of English (N = 70); and (b) non-CLIL informants (N = 35). Lexico-grammatical development is analysed on the basis of their performance on a cloze test and a fill-in-the-blanks tense-and-aspect test over a 3-year span. Our results indicate that the CLIL context appears to accelerate lexico-grammatical learning. However, CLIL learners do not surpass their non-CLIL peers when accumulated hours of instruction are equivalent. These findings point to the need for increased attention to form and integration of language and content in CLIL environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Our study being a longitudinal one, only participants that had completed all four data collection times, as described in Sect. 2.3, were eligible for analysis. Thus, participants that dropped out or failed to complete one of the two tests under study at a given data collection time were not considered.

References

  • Aguilar, M., & Muñoz, C. (2013). The effect of proficiency on CLIL benefits in engineering students in Spain. IRAL International Review of Applied Linguistics. Article first published online: 15 January 2013. doi:10.1111/ijal.12006. http://0-onlinelibrary.wiley.com.llull.uib.es/doi/10.1111/ijal.12006/pdf

  • Aguilar, M., & Rodríguez, R. (2012). Lecturer and student perceptions on CLIL at a Spanish university. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 15(2), 183–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aliaga, R. (2008). Aprendizaje integrado de contenidos y lengua (AICLE). IN. Revista Electrònica d’Investigació i Innovació Educativa i Socioeducativa, 1, 129–138. http://www.in.uib.cat/pags/volumenes/vol1_num0/aliaga/index.html

  • Amengual-Pizarro, M., & Prieto-Arranz, J. I. (2015). Exploring affective factors in L3 learning: CLIL vs. non-CLIL. In M. Juan-Garau & J. Salazar-Noguera (Eds.), Content-based language learning in multilingual educational environments (pp. 197–220). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bürgi, H. (2007). Im Sprachbad. Besseres English durch Immersion. Eine Evaluation zweiprachiger Ausbildungsgänge an drei kantonalen Gymnasien in der Schweiz. Bern: HEP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, F., & Coleman, J. (2010). Integrating content and language in higher education in Italy. International CLIL Research Journal, 3, 19–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coyle, D. (2013). Listening to learners: An investigation into “successful learning” across CLIL contexts. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 16(3), 244–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL. Content and language integrated learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton-Puffer, C. (2008). Outcomes and processes in content and language integrated learning (CLIL): Current research from Europe. In W. Delanoy & L. Wolkmann (Eds.), Future perspectives for English language teaching (pp. 139–157). Heidelberg: Carl Winter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton-Puffer, C. (2009). Communicative competence and the CLIL lesson. In Y. Ruiz de Zarobe & R. M. Jiménez Catalán (Eds.), Content and language integrated learning: Evidence from research in Europe (pp. 197–214). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeKeyser, R. (2007). Skill acquisition theory. In J. Williams & B. VanPatten (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 97–113). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R. (2005). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language: A psychometric study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 141–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Escobar Urmeneta, C. (2013). Learning to become a CLIL teacher: Teaching, reflection and professional development. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism (special issue), 16(3), 334–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • García Mayo, M. P., & Villarreal Olaizola, I. (2010). The development of suppletive and affixal tense and agreement morphemes in the L3 English of Basque-Spanish bilinguals. Second Language Research, 27(1), 129–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, J., & Lascar, E. (1998). Operationalising academic language proficiency in bilingual research. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 19(1), 40–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillyard, S. (2011). First steps in CLIL: Training the teachers. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 4(2), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huddleston, R. D., & Pullum, G. K. (2002). The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: CUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hüttner, J., & Rieder-Bünemann, A. (2007). The effect of CLIL instruction on children’s narrative competence. Vienna English Working Papers (VIEWS), 16(3), 20–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez Catalán, R. M., & Ruiz de Zarobe, Y. (2009). The receptive vocabulary of EFL learners in two instructional contexts: CLIL versus non-CLIL instruction. In Y. Ruiz de Zarobe & R. M. Jiménez Catalán (Eds.), Content and language integrated learning. Evidence from research in Europe (pp. 81–92). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez Catalán, R. M., Ruiz de Zarobe, Y., & Cenoz, J. (2006). Vocabulary profiles of English foreign learners in English as a subject and as a vehicular language. Views, 15(3), 23–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juan-Garau, M., & Salazar-Noguera, J. (2015). Learning English and learning through English: Insights from secondary education. In M. Juan-Garau & J. Salazar-Noguera (Eds.), Content-based language learning in multilingual educational environments (pp. 105–121). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keshavarz, M. H., & Salimi, H. (2007). Collocational competence and cloze test competence: A study of Iranian EFL learners. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 17(1), 81–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krashen, S. D. (1987). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. London: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lantolf, J. P. (2011). The socio-cultural approach to second language acquisition: Sociocultural theory, second language acquisition, and artificial L2 development. In D. Atkinson (Ed.), Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 24–47). London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lázaro Ibarrola, A. (2012). Faster and further morphosyntactic development of CLIL vs. EFL Basque-Spanish bilinguals learning English in high-school. IJES International Journal of English Studies, 12(1), 79–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lázaro Ibarrola, A., & García Mayo, M. P. (2012). L1 use and morphosyntactic development in the oral production of EFL learners in a CLIL context. IRAL International Review of Applied Linguistics, 50(2), 135–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lennon, P. (1998). Learner-centred testing: A role for cloze? Language Learning Journal, 17(1), 33–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Llinares, A., Morton, T., & Whittaker, R. (2012). The roles of language in CLIL. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • López-González, A. M. (2014). The effect of instruction in Polish Spanish learners’ lexical availability. In R. M. Jiménez Catalán (Ed.), Lexical availability in English and Spanish as a second language (pp. 139–168). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lyster, R. (2007). Learning and teaching languages through content: A counterbalanced approach. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez Adrián, M., & Gutiérrez Mangado, M. J. (2009). The acquisition of English syntax by CLIL learners in the Basque country. In Y. Ruiz de Zarobe & R. M. Jiménez Catalán (Eds.), Content and language integrated learning: Evidence from research in Europe (pp. 176–196). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesquida, F., & Juan-Garau, M. (2013). CLIL instruction and its effects on the development of negotiation strategies. Miscelánea: A Journal of English and American Studies, 47, 125–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz, C. (2015). Time and timing in CLIL: A comparative approach to language gains. In M. Juan-Garau & J. Salazar-Noguera (Eds.), Content-based language learning in multilingual educational environments (pp. 87–102). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikula, T. (2007). English as an object and tool of study in classrooms: Interactional effects and pragmatic implications. In C. Dalton-Puffer & U. Smit (Eds.), Empirical perspectives on CLIL classroom discourse (pp. 179–204). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikula, T. (2010). Effects of CLIL on one teacher’s classroom language use. In C. Dalton-Puffer, T. Nikula, & U. Smit (Eds.), Language use and language learning in CLIL classrooms (pp. 105–124). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pérez-Vidal, C. (2007). The need for focus on form (FoF) in content and language integrated approaches: An exploratory study. RESLA extra 1 (monographic volume), 39–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz de Zarobe, Y. (2015). The effects of implementing CLIL in education: In M. Juan-Garau, & J. Salazar-Noguera (Eds.), Content-based language learning in multilingual educational environments (pp. 51–68). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storch, N. (1998). Comparing second language learners’ attention to form across tasks. Language Awareness, 7(4), 176–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swain, M. (1990). Manipulating and complementing content-teaching to maximise second language learning. In R. Philipson, E. Kellerman, L. Selinker, M. Sharwood Smith, & M. Swain (Eds.), Foreign/second language pedagogy research (pp. 234–251). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sylvén, L. K. (2004). Teaching in English or English teaching? On the effects of content and language integrated learning on Swedish learners’ incidental vocabulary acquisition. Göteborg: Department of English, Göteborg University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sylvén, L. K. (2006). How is extramural exposure to English among Swedish school students used in the CLIL classroom? Views, 15(3), 47–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teddick, D. J., & Cammarata, L. (2012). Content and language integration in K-12 contexts: Student outcomes, teacher practices, and stakeholder perspectives. Foreign Language Annals, 45(1), 28–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vártuki, A. (2010). Linguistic benefits of the CLIL approach: Measuring linguistic competences. International CLIL Research Journal, 1(3), 67–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villarreal Olaizola, I. (2011). Tense and agreement in the non-native English of Basque-Spanish bilinguals: Content and language integrated learners vs. English as a school subject learners. Doctoral dissertation, Universidad del País Vasco, Spain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villarreal Olaizola, I., & García Mayo, M. P. (2007). Variability in tense and agreement morphology in English as L3: CBI learners vs. ESS learners. Paper presented at EUROSLA 17, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, 11–14 September 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, R., & Llinares, A. (2009). CLIL in social science classrooms: Analysis of spoken and written productions. In Y. Ruiz de Zarobe & R. M. Jiménez Catalán (Eds.), Content and language integrated learning: Evidence from research in Europe (pp. 215–234). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilhelmer, N. (2008). Content and language integrated learning (CLIL). Teaching mathematics in English. Saarbrücken: VDM Verlag Dr. Müller.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamashita, J. (2003). Processes of taking a gap-filling test: Comparison of skilled and less skilled EFL readers. Language Testing, 20, 267–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge funding from the Spanish Government (HUM2004-05442-C02-01, HUM2007-66053-C02-01/02 and FFI2013-48640-C2-2-P) and the Catalan Government (SGR2005-01086/2009-140/2014-1563).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Juan-Garau .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Juan-Garau, M., Prieto-Arranz, J.I., Salazar-Noguera, J. (2015). Lexico-Grammatical Development in Secondary Education CLIL Learners. In: Juan-Garau, M., Salazar-Noguera, J. (eds) Content-based Language Learning in Multilingual Educational Environments. Educational Linguistics, vol 23. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11496-5_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics