Abstract
This paper employs a path model to investigate the variation in how service quality is experienced by consumers. Effectively, this approach acknowledges that different consumers hold different meaning for similar service quality experiences. While prior research has examined the relationship between service quality from a static and episode perspective, the present study examines those relationships from a dynamic perspective. Consequently, the main objective of this paper is to examine the impact and evaluation of various attributes in the overall perception of service quality across customers with varying consumption relationship with the service firm. The second objective of the study is to explore the relationship between overall quality perceptions, customer satisfaction and service loyalty in the time-based perspective.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anderson, E. W. & Mittal, V. 2000. “Strengthening the satisfaction-profit chain.” Journal of Service Research 3(2): 107–120
Arnthorsson, A., Berry, W and Urbany, J.E. 1991. “Difficulty of Prepurchase Quality Inspection: Conceptualization and Measurement.” Advances in Consumer Research 18:.217–224
Boulding, W, Kalra, A, Staelin, R. and Zeithaml, V. 1993. “A dynamic process model of service quality: expectations to behavioral intentions.” Journal of Marketing Research 30: 7–27.
Darby, Michael R., and Edi Karni. 1973. “Free Competition and the Optimal Amount of Fraud.” The Journal of Law and Economics 16:67–88
Dick, A.S. and Basu, K. 1994. “Customer loyalty: toward an integrated conceptual framework.” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 22(2): 99–113
Graeff, T.R. 1997. “Comprehending product attributes and benefits: the role of product knowledge and means-end chain inferences.” Psychology & Marketing 14(2): 163–83
Grönroos, C. 1993. “Toward a third phase in service quality research: Challenges and future directions.” Advances in Services Marketing and Management 2: 49–64.
Hsee, C. K. 1996. “The evaluability hypothesis: An explanation for preference reversals between joint and separate evaluations of alternatives.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 67: 247–257
Hoch, S.J. and Deighton, J. 1989. “Managing what consumers learn from experience.” Journal of Marketing 53(April): 1–20
Homburg, Christian, Nicole Koschate and Wayne D. Hoyer. 2006. “The Role of Cognition and Affect in the Formation of Customer Satisfaction: A Dynamic Perspective.” Journal of Marketing 70: 21–31
Kaas, K.P and Busch, A. 1996. “Inspektions-, Erfahrungs- und Vertrauenseigenschaften von Produkten.” Marketing ZFP, 18(4): 243 – 252.
Kano, N. 1984. “Attractive quality and must-be quality.” The Journal of the Japanese Society for Quality Control April: 39–48
Lages, Luis Filipe & David B. Montgomery. 2004. “Export Performance as an antecedent of export commitment and marketing strategy adaptation.” European Journal of Marketing 38(9/10): 1186–1214
Liljander, V. and Strandvik, T. 1995. “The nature of customer relationships in services”, in Swartz, T., Bowen, D., Brown, S. (Eds), Advances in Services Marketing and Management JAI Press London.
Lovelock, C.H. and Wright, L. 1999. “Principles of Service Management and Marketing.” Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs: NJ
Mitchell, A.A. and Dacin, P.A. 1996. “The assessment of alternative measures of consumer expertise.” Journal of Consumer Research 23: 219–39
Mittal, V, Katrichis, J.M, Forkin, F and Konkel, M. 1993. “Does satisfaction with multi-attribute products vary over time? A performance based approach.” in Allen, C.T., John, D.R (Eds),Advances in Consumer Research, Association for Consumer Research, Ann Arbor, MI, 21: 412–17
Nelson, Phillip. 1970. “Information and Consumer Behavior.” Journal of Political Economy 78(2): 311–29
Oliver, R. L. 1980. “A Cognitive Model of the Antecedence and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions.” Journal of Marketing Research 17(September): 46–49
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A. and Malhotra, A. 2005. “E-S-QUAL a multiple-item scale for assessing electronic service quality.” Journal of Service Research 7: 213–233
Park, C. W. and Lessig, V. 1981. “The Construct of Familiarity and Its Impact upon Consumer Decision Process: Cognitive Biases and Heuristics.” Journal of Consumer Research 8(September): 223–230
Schembri, S. and Sandberg, J. 2002, “Service quality and the consumers’ experience: Towards an interpretive approach.” Marketing Theory 2 (2): 189–205
Shanteau, J. 1992. “The psychology of experts: An alternative view.” In G. Wright & F. Bolger (Eds.), Expertise and decision support. NY: Plenum Press
Sichtmann Christina. 2007. “Buyer-Seller Relationships and the Economics of Information,” Journal of Business Market Management 1(1): 59–78
Smith, R.E. and Swinyard, W.R. 1983. “Attitude- behavior consistency, the impact of product trial versus advertising.” Journal of Marketing Research 20: 257 – 67
Stigler, George J. 1961. “The Economics of Information.” Journal of Political Economy 69(3): 213–225
Teas, R. K. 1993. “Expectations, performance evaluation and consumer’s perception of quality.” Journal of Marketing, 57(4): 18– 34.
Woodruff. 1997. “Customer Value: The Next Source for Competitive Advantage.” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 25(2):139–153
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Academy of Marketing Science
About this paper
Cite this paper
Balaji, M. (2015). Dynamic Perspective of Service Experience: A Review of the Literature. In: Robinson, Jr., L. (eds) Proceedings of the 2008 Academy of Marketing Science (AMS) Annual Conference. Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10963-3_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10963-3_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-10962-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-10963-3
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)