Abstract
The diversity and versatility of the display devices have imposed new demands on digital image processing. Variant devices of different resolution screens need to display the same image for human visual experience. The retargeting methods are proposed to adapt the source image into arbitrary sizes and simultaneously keep the salient content of the source signal of high visual quality. Therefore, there is a new challenge of objectively evaluating the retargeted image perceptual quality, where variant resolutions may be presented, the objective shape may be distorted, and some content information may be discarded. In this chapter, recent progresses in quality assessment of retargeted images are reviewed. Firstly, we will review and discuss the recently developed retargeting methods for images. Afterwards, the subjective approaches to assess the retargeted image are reviewed, as well as the constructed subjective databases. Thirdly, some objective quality metrics developed recently are reviewed and compared based on the databases. Finally, future trends are discussed on retargeted image quality assessment in terms of both subjective and objective approaches.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Shamir A., and Sorkine O.: Visual media retargeting. ACM SIGGRAPH Asia Courses, (2009).
Wolf L., Guttmann M., and Cohen-Or D.: Non-homogeneous content-driven video-retargeting. Proceedings of International Conference on Computer Vision, (2007).
Krahenbuhl P., Lang M., Hornung A., and Gross M.: A system for retargeting of streaming video. Proceedings of SIGGRAPH Asia, (2009).
Avidan S., and Shamir A.: Seam carving for content-aware image resizing. Proceedings of SIGGRAPH, (2007).
Rubinstein M., Shamir A., and Avidan A.: Improved seam carving for video retargeting. Proceedings of SIGGRAPH, (2008).
Shamir A., and Avidan S.: Seam-carving for media retargeting. Communications of the ACM, 52(1), 77–85, Jan. (2009).
Rubinstein M., Shamir A., and Avidan S.: Multi-operator media retargeting. Proceedings of SIGGRAPH, (2009).
Wang Y., Tai C., Sorkine O., and Lee T.: Optimized scale-and-stretch for image resizing. Proceedings of SIGGRAPH Asia, (2008).
Pritch Y., Kav-Venaki E., and Peleg S.: Shift-map image editing. Proceedings of International Conference on Computer Vision, (2009).
Qi A., and Ho J.: Shift-map based stereo image retargeting with disparity adjustment. Proceedings of Asian Conference on Computer Vision, (2013).
Dekel T., Moses Y., and Avidan S.: Stereo seam carving: a geometrically consistent approach. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 35(10), 2513–2525, Oct. (2013).
Dekel T., Moses Y., and Avidan S.: Geometrically consistent stereo seam carving. Proceedings of International Conference on Computer Vision, (2011).
Itti L., Koch C., and Niebur E.: A model of saliency-based visual attention for rapid scene analysis. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 20(11), 1254–1259, Nov. (1998).
Karni Z., Freedman D., and Gotsman C.: Energy-based image deformation. Proceedings of Symposium on Geometry Processing, (2009).
Dong W., Zhou N., Paul J. C., and Zhang X.: Optimized image resizing using seam carving and scaling. Proceedings of SIGGRAPH, (2009).
Ma L., Deng C., Lin W., and Ngan K. N.: Image retargeting subjective quality database. Available. http://ivp.ee.cuhk.edu.hk/projects/demo/retargeting/index.html.
Rubinstein M., Gutierrez D., Sorkine O., and Shamir A.: A comparative study of image retargeting. Proceedings of SIGGRAPH Asia (2010). Available. http://people.csail.mit.edu/mrub/retargetme/.
Kendall M. G., and Babington Smith B.: On the method of paired comparisons. Biometrika, 31, 324–345, (1940).
Kendall M. G.: A new measure of rank correlation. Biometrika, 30, 81–93, (1938).
VQEG.: Final report from the video quality experts group on the validation of objective models of video quality assessment II. (2009). Available. http://www.its.bldrdoc.gov/vqeg/projects/frtv_phaseII/downloads/VQEGII_Final_Report.pdf.
VQEG. Final report from the video quality experts group on the validation of objective models of video quality assessment. (2000). Available. http://www.its.bldrdoc.gov/vqeg/projects/frtv_phaseI/.
VQEG. Final report from the video quality experts from group on the validation of objective models of multimedia quality assessment Phase 1. Available. ftp://vqeg.its.bldrdoc.gov/Documents/Projects/multimedia/MM_Final_Report/.
Sheikh H. R., Sabir M. F., and Bovik A. C.: A statistical evaluation of recent full reference image quality assessment algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 15(11), 3440–3451, Nov. (2006).
Soundararajan K., Soundararajan R., Bovik A. C., and Cormack L. K.: Study of subjective and objective quality assessment of video. IEEE Transaction on Image Processing, 19(6), 1427–1441, Jun. (2010). Available. http://live.ece.utexas.edu/research/quality/live_video.html.
Soundararajan K., Soundararajan R., Bovik A. C., and Cormack L. K.: A subjective study to evaluate video quality assessment algorithms. Proceedings of SPIE, Human Vision and Electronic Imaging, Jan. (2010).
Pinson M. H., and Wolf S.: Comparing subjective video quality testing methodologies. Proceedings of SPIE, 5150(3), 573–582, (2003).
Van Dijk A. M., Martens J. B., and Watson A. B.: Quality assessment of coded images using numerical category scaling. Proceedings of SPIE Advanced Image and Video Communications and Storage Technologies, (1995).
VQEG: Final report from the video quality experts from group on the validation of objective models of multimedia quality assessment Phase 1. Available. ftp://vqeg.its.bldrdoc.gov/Documents/Projects/multimedia/MM_Final_Report/
ITU-R Recommendation BT.500–11.: Methodology for the subjective assessment of the quality of television pictures”, ITU, Geneva, Switzerland, (2002).
ITU-T Recommendation P.910.: Subjective video quality assessment methods for multimedia applications. ITU, Geneva, Switzerland, (2008).
Ma L., Lin W., Deng C., and Ngan K. N.: Image retargeting quality assessment: a study of subjective scores and objective metrics. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, 6(6), 626–639, Oct. (2012).
Ma L., Lin W., Deng C., and Ngan K. N.: Study of subjective and objective quality assessment of retargeted images. Proceedings of International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, (2012).
Pele O., and Werman M.: Fast and robust earth mover’s distances. Proceedings of International Conference on Computer Vision, (2009).
Rubner Y., Tomasi C., and Guibas l. J.: The earth mover’s distance as a metric for image retrieval. International Journal of Computer Vision, 40(2), 99–121, Nov. (2000).
Simakov Yaron Caspi D., Shechtman E., and Irani M.: Summarizing visual data using bidirectional similarity. Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, (2008).
Barnes C., Shechtman E., Finkelstein A., and Goldman D. B.: Patchmatch: a randomized correspondence algorithm for structural image editing. Proceedings of SIGGRAPH, (2009).
Liu C., Yuen J., Torralba A., Sivic J., and Freeman W. T.: SIFT flow: dense correspondence across different scenes. Proceedings of European Conference on Computer Vision, (2008).
Liu Y., Luo X., Xuan Y., Chen W., and Fu X.: Image retargeting quality assessment. Proceedings of EUROGRAPHICS, (2011).
Manjunath B. S., Ohm J. R., Vasudevan V. V., and Yamada A.: Color and texture descriptors. IEEE Transaction on Circuits and System for Video Technology, 11(6), 703–715, Jun. (2001).
Vedaldi A., and Fulkerson B.: VLFeat: An open and portable library of computer vision algorithms. Available. http://www.vlfeat.org/, (2008).
Kasutani E., and Yamada A.: The MPEG-7 color layout descriptor: a compact image feature description for high-speed image/video segement retrieval. Proceedings of International Conference on Image Processing, 674–677, (2001).
Lowe D.:Object recognition from local scale-invariant features. Proceedings of International Conferene on Conmputer Vision, (1999).
Oliva A., and Torralba A.: Modeling the shape of the scene: a holistic representation of the spatial envelope. Internaltional Journal of Computer Vision, 42(3), 145–175, (2001).
Lu W., and Wu M.: Reduced-reference quality assessment for retargeted images. Proceedings of International Conference on Image Processing, 1497–1500, (2012).
Lowe D.: Dictinctive image features from scale invariant keypoints. International Journal of Conputer Vision, 60(2), 91–110,(2004).
Wang Z., Bovik A., Sheikh H., Simoncelli E.: Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structureal similarity. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 13(4), 600–612, Apr. (2004).
D’Angelo A., Menegaz G., and Barni M.: Perceptual quality evaluation of geometric distortions in images. Proceedings of SPIE Human Vision and Electronic Imaging, 6492, (2007).
D’Angelo A., Zhao Z., and Barni M.: A full-reference quality metric for geometrically distorted images. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 19(4), 867–881, Apr. (2010).
Acknowledgements
The work described in this chapter was partially supported by a grant from the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong SAR, China (Project CUHK 415913); the National Nature Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 61301090; the ROSE Lab grant from the Singapore National Research Foundation; the Supporting Program for Beijing Excellent Talents under Grant No. 2013D009011000001, and the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 61202242.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ma, L., Deng, C., Lin, W., Ngan, K.N., Xu, L. (2015). Retargeted Image Quality Assessment: Current Progresses and Future Trends. In: Deng, C., Ma, L., Lin, W., Ngan, K. (eds) Visual Signal Quality Assessment. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10368-6_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10368-6_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-10367-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-10368-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)