Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Challenging Approaches to Assessment of Instrumental Learning

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Assessment in Music Education: from Policy to Practice

Part of the book series: Landscapes: the Arts, Aesthetics, and Education ((LAAE,volume 16))

Abstract

Over the past 15 years research has documented many assessment strategies for higher education. In music the emphasis has been on developing reliable assessment measures for instrumental performance such as multi-dimensional rubrics for practical examinations. While music education research has demonstrated novel assessment practices in primary and secondary settings, few studies report on innovative approaches to assessment in higher education. These include self-assessment in Concert Practice and individual lessons, peer assessment using well-developed criteria and student panels, reflective journals that help students to articulate their knowledge, and group work to develop teamwork and presentation skills. This review of music assessment literature challenges engrained attitudes towards assessment of classical instrumental music learning and encourages the embracing of innovative practices already trialled in higher music education such as initiating a broader range of evaluation tasks, engaging students in the development of assessment criteria, using technology and recording for self- and peer evaluation, and helping students to develop graduate attributes for the twenty-first century.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abeles, H. F. (1973). Development and validation of a clarinet performance adjudication rating scale. Journal of Research in Music Education, 21, 246–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, B. W. (2004). Musical contracts: Fostering student participation in the instructional process. International Journal of Music Education, 22(3), 219–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergee, M. J. (1993). A comparison of faculty, peer, and self-evaluations of applied brass jury performances. Journal of Research in Music Education, 41(1), 19–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergee, M. J. (2003). Faculty interjudge reliability of music performance evaluation. Journal of Research in Music Education, 51(2), 137–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blom, D., & Encarnacao, J. (2012). Student-chosen criteria for peer assessment of tertiary rock groups in rehearsal and performance: What’s important? British Journal of Music Education, 29(1), 25–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blom, D., & Poole, K. (2004). Peer assessment of tertiary music performance: Opportunities for understanding performance assessment and performing through experience and self-reflection. British Journal of Music Education, 21(1), 111–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boud, D. (1995). Enhancing learning through self-assessment. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciorba, C. R., & Smith, N. Y. (2009). Measurement of instrumental and vocal undergraduate performance juries using a multidimensional assessment rubric. Journal of Research in Music Education, 57(1), 5–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R., & Sampson, J. (2001). Implementing and managing peer learning. In D. Boud, R. Cohen, & J. Sampson (Eds.), Peer leaning in higher education: Learning from and with each other (pp. 50–66). London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, R. (2001). Self-assessment in performance. British Journal of Music Education, 18(3), 215–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, R. (2004). Peer assessment in musical performance: The development, trial and evaluation of a methodology for the Australian tertiary environment. British Journal of Music Education, 21(1), 89–110. doi:10.1017/S265051703005515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dochy, F., Segers, M., & Sluijsmans, D. (1999). The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: A review. Studies in Higher Education, 24(3), 331–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, C. A. (1995). Race and gender as factors in judgments of musical performance. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 127, 50–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elwood, J., & Klenowski, V. (2002). Creating communities of shared practice: The challenges of assessment use in learning and teaching. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(3), 243–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falchikov, N. (2007). The place of peers in learning and assessment. In D. Boud & N. Falchikov (Eds.), Rethinking assessment in higher education: Learning for the longer term (pp. 128–143). Oxford, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, G., & Simpson, C. (2004/2005). Conditions under which assessment supports students’ learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1, 3–31. http://insight.glos.ac.uk/tli/resources/lathe/documents/issue%201/articles/simpson.pdf. Accessed 12 Sept 2013.

  • Hunter, D. (1999). Developing peer-learning programmes in music: Group presentations and peer assessment. British Journal of Music Education, 16(1), 51–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, D., & Russ, M. (1996). Peer assessment in performance studies. British Journal of Music Education, 13, 67–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, P. (1997). Performance as experience: The problem of assessment criteria. British Journal of Music Education, 14(3), 271–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, H. (1986). An application of the facet-factorial approach to scale construction in the development of a rating scale for high school vocal solo performance. PhD, The University of Oklahoma. ProQuest, UMI Dissertations Publishing, 8613727.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leach, L., Neutze, G., & Zepke, N. (2001). Assessment and empowerment: Some critical questions. Assessment & Evaluation in High Education, 26(4), 293–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lebler, D. (2007). Student-as-master? Reflections on learning innovation in popular music pedagogy. International Journal of Music Education, 25(3), 205–221. doi:10.1177/0255761407083575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, G. E., & Thompson, W. M. (1998). Assessing music performance: Issues and influences. Research Studies in Music Education, 10, 12–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, J. (1991). Assessing music performance musically. Educational Studies, 17(2), 173–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, J. P. (1985). A factor analysis approach to the development of a rating scale for snare drum performance. PhD, The University of Iowa. ProQuest, UMI Dissertations Publishing, 8527988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nightingale, P., & Magin, D. (1996). Designing, creating, performing. In P. Nightingale, I. te Wiata, S. Toohey, G. Ryan, C. Hughes, & D. Martin (Eds.), Assessing learning in universities (pp. 163–201). Sydney, Australia: University of New South Wales Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, L. (2007). Using assessment to promote quality learning in higher education. In A. Campbell & N. Lin (Eds.), Learning, teaching and assessing in higher education: Developing reflective practice (pp. 92–101). Exeter, UK: Learning Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Donovan, B., Price, M., & Rust, C. (2004). Know what I mean? Enhancing student understanding of assessment standards and criteria. Teaching in Higher Education, 9(3), 325–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, M. S., & Kenny, D. T. (2008). The role of sensitizing experiences in music performance anxiety in adolescent musicians. Psychology of Music, 36(4), 447–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palatine Higher Education Academy. (2002). Starting out in music (Resource pack). http://www.palatine.heacademy.ac.uk. Accessed 12 Sept 2013.

  • Parkes, K. A. (2010). The use of criteria specific performance rubrics for student self-assessment: A case study. In T. S. Brophy (Ed.), The practice of assessment in music education: Frameworks, models, and designs (pp. 453–458). Chicago: GIA Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (1999). Understanding learning and teaching: The experience in higher education. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rae, G., & McCambridge, K. (2004). Correlates of performance anxiety in practical music exams. Psychology of Music, 32(4), 432–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to teach in higher education (2nd ed.). London: RoutledgeFamler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rust, C. (2002). The impact of assessment on student learning: How can the research literature practically help to inform the development of departmental assessment strategies and learner-centred assessment practices? Active Learning in Higher Education, 3(2), 145–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Searby, M., & Ewers, T. (1997). An evaluation of the use of peer assessment in higher education: A case study in the School of Music, Kingston University. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 22(4), 371–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, M., Brooke, R., & Gilbert, R. (2002). Examiner perception of using criteria in music performance assessment. Research Studies in Music Education, 18, 46–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanwick, K. (1994). Musical knowledge: Intuition, analysis and music education. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Swanwick, K. (1999). Teaching music musically. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, K. (2007). Conceptions of self-assessment: What is needed for long-term learning? In D. Boud & N. Falchikov (Eds.), Rethinking assessment in higher education: Learning for the longer term (pp. 114–127). Oxford, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taras, M. (2001). The use of tutor feedback and student self-assessment in summative assessment tasks: Towards transparency for students and for tutors. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 26(6), 605–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teaching and Educational Development Institute [TEDI]. (2013). http://www.tedi.uq.edu.au. Accessed 23 Sept 2013.

  • Toohey, S. (1999). Designing courses for higher education. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wapnick, J., Flowers, P., Alegant, M., & Jasinskas, L. (1993). Consistency in piano performance evaluation. Journal of Research in Music Education, 41, 282–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zdzinski, S. F., & Barnes, G. V. (2002). Development and validation of a string performance rating scale. Journal of Research in Music Education, 50, 245–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhukov, K. (2010, July 27–30). Piano assessment in Australian higher education – Time for a change? In M. Hannan (Ed.), Proceedings from the International Society for Music Education (ISME) 18th international seminar of the Commission for the Education of the Professional Musician (CEPROM), Shanghai (pp. 92–96).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhukov, K. (2013, April 9–13). Instrumental music learning and technology at the beginning of the 21st century. Paper presented at the 8th international conference for Research in Music Education, Exeter, UK.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Part of this paper was presented at the 18th International Seminar of the Commission for the Education of the Professional Musician (CEPROM) of the International Society for Music Education (ISME) in Shanghai, China, 27–30 July 2010.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Music, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia

    Katie Zhukov

Authors
  1. Katie Zhukov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katie Zhukov .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Queensland Conservatorium, Griffith University, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

    Don Lebler

  2. Queensland Conservatorium, Griffith University, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

    Gemma Carey

  3. Queensland Conservatorium, Griffith University, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

    Scott D. Harrison

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zhukov, K. (2015). Challenging Approaches to Assessment of Instrumental Learning. In: Lebler, D., Carey, G., Harrison, S. (eds) Assessment in Music Education: from Policy to Practice. Landscapes: the Arts, Aesthetics, and Education, vol 16. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10274-0_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation