Abstract
This chapter provides a description of the functions of an innovative bespoke online assessment application. As such, it is possible to read this as being about technology, which, to an extent, is true. The technology deployed in this application is an impressive result of a substantial investment of resources on the part of Griffith University. However, it is the learning associated with the assessment process that is the central benefit, and the most significant aspect for others interested in participatory assessment practices. In this instance, self-assessment and peer assessment are deployed, along with assessment by teachers, in a multi-faceted approach to assessment as learning. It is the learning that is produced by the process that is important, rather than the technology that is deployed to enable a complex set of activities to be undertaken on a large scale.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Boud, D. (1995). Enhancing learning through self assessment. London: Kogan Page.
Lebler, D. (2006). The masterless studio: An autonomous education community. Journal of Learning Design, 1(3), 41–50.
Lebler, D. (2007). Student-as-master? Reflections on a learning innovation in popular music pedagogy. International Journal of Music Education, 25(3), 205–221. doi:10.1177/0255761407083575.
Lebler, D. (2008). Popular music pedagogy: Peer-learning in practice. Music Education Research, 10(2), 193–213. doi:10.1080/14613800802079056.
Lebler, D. (2010). Informal learning in formal learning: Web 2 to the rescue. In M. Hannan (Ed.), Musician in creative and educational spaces of the 21st century [electronic resource]: Proceedings from the International Society for Music Education (ISME) 18th international seminar of the Commission for the Education of the Professional Musician, Shanghai Conservatory of Music, July 27–30 2010 (pp. 69–72). Malvern, Australia: International Society for Music Education.
Lebler, D. (2012). Technology and students’ musicking: Enhancing the learning experience. Theory Into Practice, 51(3), 204–211. doi:10.1080/00405841.2012.690302.
Lebler, D. (2013). Using formal self- and peer-assessment as proactive tools in building collaborative learning environments: Theory into practice. In H. Gaunt & H. Westerlund (Eds.), Collaborative learning in higher music education: Why, what and how? (pp. 111–122). Farnham, UK: Ashgate.
Lebler, D., Burt-Perkins, R., & Carey, G. (2009). What the students bring: Examining the attributes of commencing conservatoire students. International Journal of Music Education: Research, 27(3), 232–249. doi:10.1177/0255761409335950.
McWilliam, E., Lebler, D., & Taylor, P. G. (2007). From passive consumers to active prod-users: Students as co-teachers in a popular music program. In L. Taxén (Ed.), 13th international conference on thinking – Curious minds think and learn by exploring the unknown, Norrköping, Sweden, June 17–21 2007 (Vol. 1, pp. 115–121). Linköping, Sweden: Linköping University Electronic Press, Linköpings universitet.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lebler, D. (2015). The BoPMAT: Bachelor of Music Popular Music Program. In: Lebler, D., Carey, G., Harrison, S. (eds) Assessment in Music Education: from Policy to Practice. Landscapes: the Arts, Aesthetics, and Education, vol 16. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10274-0_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10274-0_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-10273-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-10274-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)