Advertisement

Affect, Availability and Presence

  • Phil TurnerEmail author

Abstract

This chapter is intended to be both theoretical and a little speculative. It draws upon psychological, neuro-dynamic and philosophical sources to create an account of what happens when we experience presence, that is, when we become aware that we are present. This chapter also offers an alternate treatment of the work of Riva and his colleagues with respect to their bio-cultural approach to presence.

Rather than appealing to evolution, biology or technology, this account starts like this: affect precedes cognition. We feel before we think. These feelings (or affective responses) are primarily evaluative and effectively prime our cognition for the world (real or digital) we find ourselves in. All of the apparatus of sense making, reasoning and so forth follow fairly quickly but they are not the first responders. Our affective response is very fast – much faster than our cognition.

In answering the question, how do we find the world, that is, just what is this affective response in response to, we must switch from psychology to philosophy.

Heidegger tells us that we encounter the world as available. Psychology and sense making follow this. We connect with this available world by what Merleau-Ponty calls an intentional arc or intentional threads which “anchor us” to it. This is not simply philosophical discourse as Freeman is able to explain the neuro-dynamics of this arc by invoking the operation of the limbic system – that is, those parts of the brain responsible for our emotional response to the world.

Keywords

Affect Response Cognition Intentional impressions Intentions Consciousness 

References

  1. Ballew, C. C., II, & Todorov, A. (2007). Predicting political elections from rapid and unreflective face judgments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(46), 17948–17953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Basso, A., Goldberg, D., Greenspan, S., & Weimer, D. (2001). First impressions: Emotional and cognitive factors underlying judgments of trust in e-commerce. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM conference on electronic commerce (pp. 137–143). New York: ACM Press.Google Scholar
  3. Berry, D. S. (2000). Attractiveness, attraction, and sexual selection: Evolutionary perspectives on the form and function of physical attractiveness. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 273–342). San Diego: Academic.Google Scholar
  4. Blackemore, S. J., & Decety, J. (2001). From the perception of action to the understanding of intention. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 561–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Borkenau, P., Brecke, S., Möttig, C., & Paelecke, M. (2009). Extraversion is accurately perceived after a 50-ms exposure to a face. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 703–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bornstein, R. F. (1992). Subliminal mere exposure effects. In R. F. Bornstein & T. S. Pittman (Eds.), Perception without awareness. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bouchard, S., Robillard, G., Marchand, A., Renaud, P., & Riva, G. (2005). Presence and the bond between patients and their psychotherapists in the cognitive-behavior therapy of panic disorder with agoraphobia delivered in videoconference. In 2007 10th Annual International Workshop on Presence, October 25–27, 2007 Barcelona, Spain (pp. 265–276).Google Scholar
  8. Brentano, F. C. (1874). Psychology from an empirical standpoint (A. C. Rancurello, D. B. Terrell & L. McAlister, Trans.). London: Routledge, 1993.Google Scholar
  9. Brentano, F. (1995). Psychology from an empirical standpoint (A. C. Rancurello, D. B. Terrell & L. L. McAlister, Trans.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Carlin, A. S., Hoffman, H. G., & Weghorst, S. (1997). Virtual reality and tactile augmentation in the treatment of spider phobia: A case study. Behavior Research and Therapy, 35, 153–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2008). Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of social perception: The stereotype content model and the BIAS map. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 40, pp. 61–149). New York: Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cunningham, M. R. (1986). Measuring the physical in physical attractiveness: Quasi-experiments on the sociobiology of female facial beauty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 925–935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Damasio, A. (1999). The feeling of what happens: Body and emotion in the making of consciousness. New York: Harcourt Brace and Co.Google Scholar
  14. Damasio, A. (2010). Self comes to mind: Constructing the conscious brain. London: William Heinemann.Google Scholar
  15. Dreyfus, H. L. (1991). Being-in-the-world: A commentary on Heidegger’s being and time, Division 1. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  16. Dreyfus, H. L., & Wrathall, M. A. (2005). Introduction. In H. L. Dreyfus & M. A. Wrathall (Eds.), A companion to Heidegger. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Freeman, W. J. (1995). Societies of brains. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  18. Freeman, W. J. (1999). Consciousness, intentionality and causality. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6(11–12), 143–172.Google Scholar
  19. Garcia-Palacios, A., Hoffman, H. G., Kwong See, S., Tsai, A., & Botella, C. (1998). Redefining therapeutic success with virtual reality exposure therapy. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 4(3), 341–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gawronski, B., Rydell, R. J., Vervliet, B., & De Houwer, J. (2010). Generalization versus contextualization in automatic evaluation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139(4), 683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gibson, J. J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  22. Goldie, P. (2002). The emotions: A philosophical exploration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Grèzes, J., & Decety, J. (2002). Does visual perception of object afford action? Evidence from a neuroimaging study. Neuropsychologia, 40, 212–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Harman, G. (2002). Tool being: Heidegger and the metaphysics of objects. Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
  25. Heidegger, M. (1927/1962). Being and time (J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson, Trans.). New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  26. LeDoux, J. (1996). The emotional brain: The mysterious underpinnings of emotional life. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  27. Lindgaard, G., Fernandes, G., Dudek, C., & Brown, J. (2006). Attention web designers: You have 50 milliseconds to make a good first impression! Behaviour & Information Technology, 25(2), 115–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945/1962). Phenomenology of perception (C. Smith, Trans.). London: Routledge Classics.Google Scholar
  29. Norman, D. A. (1988). Psychology of everyday things. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  30. Norman, D. A. (2004). Emotional design. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  31. Oatley, K. (1992). Best laid schemes: The psychology of emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Oatley, K., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1987). Towards a cognitive account of emotions. Cognition & Emotion, 1, 29–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Piaget, J. (1963). The origins of intelligence in children. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  34. Piaget, J. (1973). The child’s conception of the world. London: Palladin.Google Scholar
  35. Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1956). The child’s conception of space. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  36. Riva, G., & Waterworth, J. A. (2013). Being present in a virtual world. In M. Grimshaw (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of virtuality (pp. 205–221). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Riva, G., Waterworth, J. A., & Waterworth, E. L. (2004). The layers of presence: A bio-cultural approach to understanding presence in natural and mediated environments. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7(4), 405–419.Google Scholar
  38. Rothbaum, B. O., Hodges, L., Watson, B. A., Kessler, G. D., & Opdyke, D. (1996). Virtual reality exposure therapy in the treatment of fear of flying: A case report. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 34, 477–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rule, N. O., & Ambady, N. (2008). Brief exposures: Male sexual orientation is accurately perceived at 50 ms. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1100–1105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schachter, S., & Singer, J. E. (1962). Cognitive, social, and physiological determinants of emotional state. Psychological Review, 69(5), 378–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Searle, J. (1983). Intentionality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Turvey, M. T. (1992). Affordances and prospective control: An outline of the ontology. Ecological Psychology, 4(3), 173–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Warren, W. H. (1984). Perceiving affordances: Visual guidance of stair climbing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 683–703.Google Scholar
  44. Willis, J., & Todorov, A. (2006). First impressions making up your mind after a 100-Ms exposure to a face. Psychological Science, 17(7), 592–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wundt, W. M. (1897). Outlines of psychology (C. Hubbard Judd, Trans.). Available from http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/Wundt/Outlines/sec15.htm. Last retrieved December 29, 2013.
  46. Zahorik, P., & Jenison, R. L. (1998). Presence as being-in-the-world. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 7, 78–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zajonc, R. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35, 151–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of ComputingEdinburgh Napier UniversityEdinburghUK

Personalised recommendations