Skip to main content

Abstract

Different terms have been used to describe patient behaviour when advised by a practitioner to take medication or make significant changes to their lifestyle. Compliance refers to the patient following the practitioner’s orders obediently without question, whilst adherence implies that the patient follows the request with more negotiation. More recently the term concordance has been used to describe treatment related behaviour, particularly in the UK. Concordance implies a complete power balance between the clinician and the patient in which they work on equal terms to reach an agreement regarding treatment. Rates of non-concordance vary, depending on the nature and duration of the illness as well as a number of patient variables. However, non-concordance in chronic wounds is similar to other chronic illnesses, standing at around 50 %. According to Ley’s (1989) cognitive hypothesis model, concordance is predicted by the patient’s understanding of the information provided during the consultation, how well they can recall this information, and overall satisfaction with the consultation. The way information is communicated can have an impact on the way the patient recalls and understands what has been communicated. To ensure that information is communicated effectively it should be clear, simple and jargon free. Furthermore, using more than one mode of communication will enhance patient recall (for example using written as well as spoken information). A patient’s health beliefs and perceptions about the causes and consequences of their wound may also influence treatment concordance. In addition social support can also have a positive influence on concordance, however the most effective support seems to be that provided by family and peers. The clinician can also provide social support to the patient, however, the most successful type is informative or educational support. Finally, there is an important link between patient-centred consultations and good concordance; clear communication within a therapeutic, non-judgmental relationship appears to hold the key to good concordance (see Box 7.1).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aharony L, Strasser S. Patient satisfaction: what we know about and what we still need to explore. Med Care Rev. 1993;50(1):49–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen I, Fishbein M. Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall; 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bale S, Jones V. Wound care nursing: a patient-centred approach. New York: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnhoorn F, Adriaanse H. In search of factors responsible for non-compliance among tuberculosis patients in Wardha District, India. Soc Sci Med. 1992;34:219–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates MS, Rankin-Hill L, Sanchez-Ayendez M. The effects of the cultural context of health care on treatment of and response to chronic pain and illness. Soc Sci Med. 1997;45(9):1433–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bender BG. Overcoming barriers to nonadherence in asthma treatment. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2002;109(6):S554–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berkman LF, Glass T, Brissette I, Seeman TE. From social integration to health: Durkheim in the new millennium. Soc Sci Med. 2000;51(6):843–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bissell P, May CR, Noyce PR. From compliance to concordance: barriers to accomplishing a re-framed model of health care interactions. Soc Sci Med. 2004;58(4):851–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard CG, Albrecht TL, Ruckdeschel JC, Grant CH, Hemmick RM. The role of social support in adaptation to cancer and to survival. J Psychosoc Oncol. 1995;13(1–2):75–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charles H. The impact of leg ulcers on patients’ quality of life. Prof Nurse. 1995;10(9):571–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Charles H. The Lindsay leg club model. EWMA J. 2010;10(3):38–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulter A, Collins A. Making shared decision-making a reality. No decision about me, without me. London: King’s Fund; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crookes M. Making a fresh start. Nurs Times. 1997;93:68–74.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Da Costa D, Clarke AE, Dobkin PL, Senecal JL, Fortin PR, Danoff DS, Esdaile JM. The relationship between health status, social support and satisfaction with medical care among patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Int J Qual Health Care. 1999;11(3):201–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Delp C, Jones J. Communicating information to patients: the use of cartoon illustrations to improve comprehension of instructions. Acad Emerg Med. 1996;3(3):264–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health. Equity and excellence: liberating the NHS. London: Stationery Office; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson D, Wilkie P, Harris M. Taking medicines: concordance is not compliance. BMJ. 1999;319(7212):787.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DiMatteo MR. Social support and patient adherence to medical treatment: a meta-analysis. Health Psychol. 2004;23(2):207.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Druley JA, Townsend AL. Self-esteem as a mediator between spousal support and depressive symptoms: a comparison of healthy individuals and individuals coping with arthritis. Health Psychol. 1998;17:255–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar-Jacob J, Sereika S, Rohay JM, Burke LE, Kwoh CK. Predictors of adherence: Differences by measurement method. Ann Behav Med. 1995;17:S196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards LM, et al. An exploration of patients’ understanding of leg ulceration. J Wound Care. 2002;11(1):35–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Erickson CA, Lanza DJ, Karp DL, Edwards JW, Seabrook GR, Cambria RA, et al. Healing of venous ulcers in an ambulatory care program: the roles of chronic venous insufficiency and patient compliance. J Vasc Surg. 1995;22:629–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ertl P. How do you make your treatment decision? Prof Nurse. 1992;7:543–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Finlayson K, Edwards H, Courtney M. The impact of psychosocial factors on adherence to compression therapy to prevent recurrence of venous leg ulcers. J Clin Nurs. 2010;29:1289–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan M, Rotchell L, Fletcher J, Schofield J. Community nurses’, home carers’ and patients’ perceptions of factors affecting venous leg ulcer recurrence and management of services. J Nurs Manag. 2001;9:153–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman LC, Kalidas M, Elledge R, Chang J, Romero C, Husain I, Dulay MF, Liscum KR. Optimism, social support and psychosocial functioning among women with breast cancer. Psychooncology. 2006;15:595–603.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Furlong W. Venous disease treatment and compliance: the nursing role. Br J Nurs. 2001;10 Suppl 2:S18–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gorecki C, Brown JM, Nelson EA, Briggs M, Schoonhoven L, Dealey C, Defloor T, Nixon J & on behalf of the European Quality of Life Pressure Ulcer Project group. Impact of pressure ulcers on quality of life in older patients: a systematic review. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009;57:1175–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallett CE, Austin L, Caress A, Luker KA. Community nurses’ perceptions of patient ‘compliance’ in wound care: a discourse analysis. J Adv Nurs. 2000;32(1):115–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heaney CA, Israel BA. Social networks and social support. In: Health behavior and health education: theory, research, and practice. 3rd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2002. p. 185–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinen MM, Evers AWM, Van Uden CJT, Van Der Vleuten CJM, Van De Kerkhof PCM, Van Achterberg T. Sedentary patients with venous or mixed leg ulcers: determinants of physical activity. J Adv Nurs. 2007;60(1):50–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hill MN. Strategies for patient education. Clin Exp Hypertens. 1989;11(5–6):1187–201.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Horne R, Weinman J, Barber N, Elliott RA, Morgan M. Concordance, adherence and compliance in medicine taking: a conceptual map and research priorities. London: National Co-ordinating Centre for NHS Service Delivery and Organisation NCCSDO; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janz NK, Becker MH. The health belief model: a decade later. Health Educ Q. 1984;11(1):1–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Joosten EA, DeFuentes-Merillas L, De Weert GH, Sensky T, Van Der Staak CPF, de Jong CA. Systematic review of the effects of shared decision-making on patient satisfaction, treatment adherence and health status. Psychother Psychosom. 2008;77(4):219–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kerse N, Buetow S, Mainous AG, Young G, Coster G, Arroll B. Physician-patient relationship and medication compliance: a primary care investigation. Ann Fam Med. 2004;2(5):455–61.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kessels RP. Patients’ memory for medical information. J R Soc Med. 2003;96(5):219–22.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kyngäs H, Duffy ME, Kroll T. Conceptual analysis of compliance. J Clin Nurs. 2000;9(1):5–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leventhal H, Cameron L. Behavioral theories and the problem of compliance. Patient Educ Couns. 1987;10:117–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leventhal H, Benyamini Y, Brownlee S, et al. Illness representations: theoretical foundations. In: Petrie KJ, Weinman JA, editors. Perceptions of health and illness. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic; 1997. p. 19–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leventhal H, Brissette I, Leventhal EA. The common-sense model of self-regulation of health and illness. In: Cameron LD, Leventhal H, editors. The self-regulation of health and illness behaviour. London: Routledge; 2003. p. 42–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinson W, Chaumeton N. Communication between surgeons and patients in routine office visits. Surgery. 1999;125(2):127–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ley P. Professional non-compliance: a neglected problem. Br J Clin Psychol. 1981;20:151–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ley P. Improving patients’ understanding, recall, satisfaction and compliance. In: Health psychology. USA: Springer; 1989. p. 74–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liefooghe R, Michaels N, Habib S, Moran MB, De Muynck A. Perceptions and social consequences of tuberculosis: A focus group study of tuberculosis patients in Sailkot, Pakistan. Soc Sci Med. 1995;41:1685–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Like R, Zyzanski SJ. Patient requests in family practice: a focal point for clinical negotiations. Fam Pract. 1986;3(4):216–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Like R, Zyzanski SJ. Patient satisfaction with the clinical encounter: social psychological determinants. Soc Sci Med. 1987;24:351.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay E. Leg clubs: A new approach to patient centred leg ulcer management. Nurs Health Sci. 2000;2(3):139–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay ET. Compliance with science: benefits of developing community leg clubs. Br J Nurs. 2001;10(22 Suppl):S66–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Little P, Everitt H, Williamson I, Warner G, Moore M, Gould C, et al. Preferences of patients for patient centred approach to consultation in primary care: observational study. BMJ. 2001;322(7284):468.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mallinger JB, Griggs JJ, Shields CG. Patient-centered care and breast cancer survivors’ satisfaction with information. Patient Educ Couns. 2005;57(3):342–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald HP, Garg AX, Haynes RB. Interventions to enhance patient adherence to medication prescriptions: scientific review. JAMA. 2002;288(22):2868–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire LC. Remembering what the doctor said: organization and older adults’ memory for medical information. Exp Aging Res. 1996;22:403–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McKinstry B. Do patients wish to be involved in decision making in the consultation? A cross sectional survey with video vignettes. BMJ. 2000;321(7265):867–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mechanic D. Health and illness behavior and patient-practitioner relationships. Soc Sci Med. 1992;34(12):1345–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe R. Compliance, adherence, concordance–what’s in a NAME? Pract Neurol. 2005;5(4):192–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moffatt MF. SPINK5: a gene for atopic dermatitis and asthma. Clin Exp Allergy. 2004a;34:325–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moffatt CJ. Factors that affect concordance with compression therapy. J Wound Care. 2004b;13(7):291–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan PA, Moffatt CJ. Non healing leg ulcers and the nurse–patient relationship. Part 2: the nurse’s perspective. Int Wound J. 2008;5(2):332–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Playle JF, Keeley P. Non-compliance and professional power. J Adv Nurs. 1998;27:304–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Poulton BC. Use of the consultation satisfaction questionnaire to examine patients’ satisfaction with general practitioners and community nurses: reliability, replicability and discriminant validity. Br J Gen Pract. 1996;46(402):26–31.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy M, Kohr R, Queen D, Keast D, Sibbald RG. Practical treatment of wound pain and trauma: a patient-centered approach. An overview. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2003a;49(4 Suppl):2–15.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy M, Keast D, Fowler E, Sibbald RG. Pain in pressure ulcers. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2003b;49(4A Suppl):30–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenstock IM, Strecher VJ, Becker MH. Social learning theory and the health belief model. Health Educ Behav. 1988;15(2):175–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Russell S, Daly J, Hughes E. Nurses and ‘difficult’ patients: negotiating non compliance. J Adv Nurs. 2003;43(3):281–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal JZ. “Compliance” to “concordance”: A critical view. J Med Humanit. 2007;28(2):81–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sherbourne CD, Hays RD, Ordway L, DiMatteo MR, Kravitz RL. Antecedents of adherence to medical recommendations: results from the Medical Outcomes Study. J Behav Med. 1992;15(5):447–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Snelgrove S. Factors contributing to poor concordance in health care. Medicine. 2006;46(1):119–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanton AL. Determinants of adherence to medical regimens by hypertensive patients. J Behav Med. 1987;10:377–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart R, Bhagwanjee AM, Mbakaza Y, Binase T. Pressure garment adherence in adult patients with burn injuries: An analysis of patient and clinician perceptions. Am J Occup Ther. 2000;54:598–606.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Swenson SL, Buell S, Zettler P, White M, Ruston DC, Lo B. Patient-centered Communication. J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19(11):1069–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Hecke A, Grypdonck M, Defloor T. Interventions to enhance patient compliance with leg ulcer treatment: a review of the literature. J Clin Nurs. 2008;17(1):29–39.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Rijswijk L, Gray M. Evidence, research, and clinical practice: a patient-centered framework for progress in wound care. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2012;39(1):35–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vileikyte L, Rubin RR, Leventhal H. Psychological aspects of diabetic neuropathic foot complications: an overview. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2004;20(S1):S13–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vojnovic M, Martinov-Cvejin M, Grujic V. Biosocial aspects of physician-patient communication in general medicine. Med Pregl. 1997;50(9–10):395–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wahl C, Gregoire JP, Teo K, Beaulieu M, Labelle S, Leduc B, Montague T. Concordance, compliance and adherence in healthcare: closing gaps and improving outcomes. Healthc Q. 2005;8(1):65–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss M, Britten N. What is concordance? Pharm J. 2003;271:493.

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO. Adherence to long-term therapies: evidence for action. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf MH, Putnam SM, James SA, Stiles WB. The medical interview satisfaction scale: development of a scale to measure patient perceptions of physician behavior. J Behav Med. 1978;1(4):391–401.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Upton, D., Upton, P. (2015). Concordance. In: Psychology of Wounds and Wound Care in Clinical Practice. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09653-7_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09653-7_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-09652-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-09653-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics