Abstract
Boundary Objects and Knowledge Artifacts are physical entities that can be found in many socio-material settings in the organizational (and inter-organizational) domain, and share many characteristics. We make the point that an increasing number of authors mention either constructs partly unaware of their denotational meaning, i.e., the precise meaning it has been attached to them by their proponents to make them meaningful and useful. The risk is having these concepts lose their rhetorical, descriptive and applicative power. We contribute in stressing the importance to reconsider the denotational meaning in contrast to the metaphorical ones of these two concepts, for their role in the analysis of the functions of real objects supporting collaboration and knowledge work. This is done towards the more accurate elicitation of requirements for the digitization of these objects, as well as for the design and deployment of new IT artifacts in the organizational domain.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
In this view, also the loose interaction between the writer of a book and its readers can be considered as a sort of asynchronous and distributed collaboration, and the book as playing the role of mediator in the unidirectional information exchange enabled by its reading.
References
Cahill, A.G., Stevens, J.M., La Plante, J.M.: The utilization of information systems technology and its impact on organizational decision making: the case of state budgeting offices. Sci. Commun. 12, 53–79 (1990)
Lee, C.P.: Boundary negotiating artifacts: unbinding the routine of boundary objects and embracing chaos in collaborative work. CSCW 16, 307–339 (2007)
Trompette, P., Vinck, D.: Revisiting the notion of boundary object. Rev. Anthropol. Connaiss. 3(1), 3 (2009)
Star, S.L.: This is not a boundary object: reflections on the origin of a concept. Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 35, 601–617 (2010)
Salazar-Torres, G., Colombo, E., Da Silva, F.S.C., Noriega, C.A., Bandini, S.: Design issues for knowledge artifacts. Knowl. Based Syst. 21, 856–867 (2008)
Cabitza, F., Colombo, G., Simone, C.: Leveraging underspecification in knowledge artifacts to foster collaborative activities in professional communities. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 71, 24–45 (2013)
Halverson, C., Ackerman, M., Erickson, T., Kellogg, W.A. (eds.): Resources, Co-Evolution and Artifacts: Theory in CSCW. Springer, Berlin (2008)
Alter, S.: Work systems and IT artifacts: does the definition matter? Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 17, 299–313 (2006)
Vinck, D.: Everyday Engineering: An Ethnography of Design and Innovation. MIT, Cambridge (2009)
Star, S.L., Griesemer, J.R.: Institutional ecology, “translations” and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907–1939. Soc. Stud. Sci. 19, 387–420 (1989)
Unruh, D.R.: The nature of social worlds. Pac. Sociol. Rev. 23, 271–296 (1980)
Wenger, E.: Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)
Fujimara, J.H.: Crafting science: standardized packages, boundary objects, and “translation”. In: Pickering, A. (ed.) Science as Practice and Culture, pp. 168–211. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1992)
Star, S.L., Bowker, G.C.: Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. MIT Press, London (1999)
Dourish, P.: Where the Action Is: The Foundations of Embodied Interaction. MIT Press, Cambridge (2001)
Strauss, A.L.: Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1987)
Hillery, G.A.: Definitions of community: areas of agreement. Rural. Sociol. 20, 111–123 (1955)
Strauss, A.: Social worlds and their segmentation processes. Stud. Symb. Interact. 5, 123–139 (1984)
Unruh, D.R.: Invisible Lives: Social Worlds of the Aged. Sage, Beverly Hills (1983)
Addleson, M.: Will the real story of collaboration please stand up so we can see it properly? Knowl. Manag. Res. Pract. 11, 32–40 (2012)
Nonaka, I., Konno, N.: The concept of “ba”: building a foundation for knowledge creation. Calif. Manag. Rev. 40, 40–54 (1998)
Gherardi, S.: Organizational Knowledge: The Texture of Workplace Learning. Blackwell, Malden (2005)
Turnbull, D.: Rationality and the disunity of the sciences. In: Selin, H. (ed.) Mathematics Across Cultures. Springer, Amsterdam (2000)
Holsapple, C.W., Joshi, K.D.: Knowledge management: a threefold framework. Inf. Soc. 18, 47–64 (2002)
McInerney, C.: Knowledge management and the dynamic nature of knowledge. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 53, 1009–1018 (2002)
Parirokh, M., Daneshgar, F., Fattahi, R.: Identifying knowledge-sharing requirements in academic libraries. Libr. Rev. 57, 107–122 (2008)
Bandini, S., Colombo, E., Colombo, G., Sartori, F., Simone, C.: The role of knowledge artifacts in innovation management: The case of a chemical compound, designer CoP. In: C&T2003: Proceedings of the First Communities and Technologies Conference, pp. 327–345. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Amsterdam (2003)
Ackerman, M.S., Dachtera, J., Pipek, V., Wulf, V.: Sharing knowledge and expertise: the CSCW view of knowledge management. Comput. Support. Coop. Work 22, 531–573 (2013)
Cabitza, F., Locoro, A.: Between form and perform: the knowledge artifact in organizations and IT design. In: IS 2014: Proceedings of the 7th IADIS International Conference on Information Systems 2014, Puerta del Sol, Madrid, 28 February–2 March 2014
Holsapple, C.W., Joshi, K.D.: Organizational knowledge resources. Decis. Support. Syst. 31, 39–54 (2001)
Massey, A.P., Montoya-Weiss, M.M.: Unraveling the temporal fabric of knowledge conversion: a model of media selection and use. MIS Q. 30, 99–114 (2006) http://www.jstor.org/stable/25148719
Cook, S.D.N., Brown, J.S.: Bridging epistemologies: the generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing. Organ. Sci. 10, 381–400 (1999)
Ewenstein, B., Whyte, J.K.: Visual representations as “artefacts of knowing”. Build. Res. Inf. 35, 81–89 (2007)
Seiner, R.: Metadata as a knowledge management enabler. TDAN.com KIK Consult. Serv. Data Adm. Newsl. TDAN.com. 15 (2001)
Mangisengi, O., Essmayr, W.: P2P Knowledge Management: An Investigation of the Technical Architecture and Main Processes, DEXA’03, pp. 787–791. IEEE Computer Society, Washington (2003)
Brown, J.S., Duguid, P.: Organizational learning and communities of practice: towards a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organ. Sci. 2, 40–57 (1991)
Suchman, L.: Human–Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2006)
Ardito, C., Barricelli, B.R., Buono, P., Costabile, M.F., Piccinno, A., Valtolina, S., Zhu, L.: Visual mediation mechanisms for collaborative design and development. In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) Universal Access in Human–Computer Interaction. Design for All and eInclusion, pp. 3–11. Springer, Berlin (2011)
Polanyi, M., Sen, A.: The Tacit Dimension. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (2009)
Cabitza, F., Simone, C.: Computational coordination mechanisms: a tale of a struggle for flexibility. CSCW 22, 475–529 (2013)
Henderson, K.: On Line and on Paper: Visual Representations, Visual Culture, and Computer Graphics in Design Engineering. MIT Press, Cambridge (1999)
Strauss, A., Fagerhaugh, S., Suczek, B., Wiener, C.: The Social Organization of Medical Work. University of Chicago Press, New York (1985)
Berg, M.: Accumulating and coordinating: occasions for information technologies in medical work. CSCW 8, 373–401 (1999)
Fitzpatrick, G.: Integrated care and the working record. Health Inform. J. 10, 291–302 (2004)
Tellioglu, H., Wagner, I.: Work practices surrounding PACS: the politics of space in hospitals. Comput. Support. Coop. Work. 10, 163–188 (2001)
Cabitza, F., Simone, C., Sarini, M.: Leveraging coordinative conventions to promote collaboration awareness. CSCW 18, 301–330 (2009)
Ellingsen, G., Monteiro, E.: A patchwork planet integration and cooperation in hospitals. Comput. Support. Coop. Work. 12, 71–95 (2003)
Winthereik, B.R., Vikkelso, S.: ICT and integrated care: some dilemmas of standardising inter-organisational communication. CSCW 14, 43–67 (2005)
Walsham, G.: Actor-network theory and is research: current status and future prospects. In: Information Systems and Qualitative Research, pp. 466–480. Springer, New York (1997)
Cabitza, F., Simone, C.: “Through the glassy box”: supporting appropriation in user communities. In: Ciolfi, L., Martin, D. (eds.) COOP 2014: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on the Design of Cooperative Systems. Springer, Nice (2014)
Goldkuhl, G.: From ensemble view to ensemble artefact: an inquiry on conceptualizations of the IT. Artefact Syst. Signs Actions 7, 49–72 (2013)
Silver, M.S., Markus, M.L.: Conceptualizing the SocioTechnical (ST) artifact. Syst. Signs Actions 7, 82–89 (2013)
Markus, M.L., Mentzer, K.: Foresight for a responsible future with ICT. Inf. Syst. Front. 16(3), 353–368 (2014) http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10796-013-9479-9#page-1
Harrison, M.I., Koppel, R., Bar-Lev, S.: Unintended consequences of information technologies in health care: an interactive sociotechnical analysis. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 14, 542–549 (2007)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Cabitza, F. (2015). At the Boundary of Communities and Roles: Boundary Objects and Knowledge Artifacts as Resources for IS Design. In: Mola, L., Pennarola, F., Za, S. (eds) From Information to Smart Society. Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation, vol 5. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09450-2_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09450-2_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-09449-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-09450-2
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)