Abstract
Cancer, medically termed as malignant neoplasm, is characterized by uncontrolled cell division and growth, resulting from genome instability or dysregulated responses to physiological cues that regulate normal cellular processes including proliferation, survival, and differentiation. Intensive investigations over the past decades have demonstrated that cancer can be considered largely a genetic disease, and typically multiple genetic alteration events are required in order for primary cells to become malignant, including loss of tumor suppressor functions combined with gain of oncoprotein functions (Fukasawa, Nat Rev Cancer 7(12):911–924, 2007; Crusio et al., Oncogene 29(35):4865–4873, 2010).
Recently, there has been a wealth of literature demonstrating that F-box proteins, complexed with other essential components (Skp1 and Cullin) to form SCF-type of E3 ubiquitin ligase complexes, play a pivotal role in the development and progression of human malignancies (Nakayama and Nakayama, Nat Rev Cancer 6(5):369–381, 2006; Welcker and Clurman, Nat Rev Cancer 8(2):83–93, 2008). Mechanistically, mounting evidence supports the notion that F-box proteins are involved in governing multiple cellular processes including cell proliferation, apoptosis, invasion, angiogenesis, and metastasis (Cardozo and Pagano, Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 5(9):739–751, 2004). With many excellent studies in recent years regarding how F-box proteins contribute to human diseases such as cancer (Nakayama and Nakayama, Nat Rev Cancer 6(5):369–381, 2006; Welcker and Clurman, Nat Rev Cancer 8(2):83–93, 2008), now is a pertinent time to review our current understanding of how F-box proteins, including the well-established Fbw7, Skp2, and β-TRCP, are involved in tumorigenesis by controlling cell growth and apoptosis, regulation of invasion and metastasis, display of stem cell features, and establishment of drug resistance. Moreover, we also review the underlying mechanisms by which F-box proteins are regulated, and how these pathways when disrupted can promote tumorigenesis.
In addition to SCF ubiquitin ligases, the Anaphase Promoting Complex/Cyclosome (APC/C, also called APC) is also a major ubiquitin ligase, which is a driving force in governing proper cell cycle progression, especially regulating timely transitions during mitosis, and entry into S phase (Peters, Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 7(9):644–656, 2006). The APC consists of a core holoenzyme and an adaptor protein, either Cdh1 or Cdc20. Recent genetic and biochemical studies revealed that APCCdc20 as a putative oncoprotein (Li et al., Mol Cell Biol 27(9):3481–3488, 2007; Manchado et al., Cancer Cell 18(6):641–654, 2010; Yin et al. Cell Cycle 6(23):2990–2992, 2007) while APCCdh1 likely functions as a tumor suppressor (Garcia-Higuera et al. Nat Cell Biol 10(7):802–811, 2008; Li et al. Nat Cell Biol 10(9):1083–1089, 2008), yet the underlying molecular mechanisms by which these two lases exert their effects on tumorigenesis remain largely undefined. Moreover, studies from various groups have revealed an intensive crosstalk between the APC and SCF E3 ligase complexes in coordinating the timely cell cycle transitions. Hence, it is critical to summarize recent advances in our genetic and biochemical understanding of how various APC and SCF complexes and their regulators function in tumorigenesis, which will be useful in guiding the development of specific inhibitors targeting ubiquitin ligase function as novel anticancer treatments.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Crusio KM, et al. The ubiquitous nature of cancer: the role of the SCF(Fbw7) complex in development and transformation. Oncogene. 2010;29(35):4865–73.
Nakayama KI, Nakayama K. Ubiquitin ligases: cell-cycle control and cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006;6(5):369–81.
Welcker M, Clurman BE. FBW7 ubiquitin ligase: a tumour suppressor at the crossroads of cell division, growth and differentiation. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008;8(2):83–93.
Cardozo T, Pagano M. The SCF ubiquitin ligase: insights into a molecular machine. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2004;5(9):739–51.
Peters JM. The anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome: a machine designed to destroy. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2006;7(9):644–56.
Li M, York JP, Zhang P. Loss of Cdc20 causes a securin-dependent metaphase arrest in two-cell mouse embryos. Mol Cell Biol. 2007;27(9):3481–8.
Manchado E, et al. Targeting mitotic exit leads to tumor regression in vivo: modulation by Cdk1, Mastl, and the PP2A/B55alpha, delta phosphatase. Cancer Cell. 2010;18(6):641–54.
Yin S, et al. Cdc20 is required for the anaphase onset of the first meiosis but not the second meiosis in mouse oocytes. Cell Cycle. 2007;6(23):2990–2.
Garcia-Higuera I, et al. Genomic stability and tumour suppression by the APC/C cofactor Cdh1. Nat Cell Biol. 2008;10(7):802–11.
Li M, et al. The adaptor protein of the anaphase promoting complex Cdh1 is essential in maintaining replicative lifespan and in learning and memory. Nat Cell Biol. 2008;10(9):1083–9.
Malumbres M, Barbacid M. Cell cycle, CDKs and cancer: a changing paradigm. Nat Rev Cancer. 2009;9(3):153–66.
Besson A, Dowdy SF, Roberts JM. CDK inhibitors: cell cycle regulators and beyond. Dev Cell. 2008;14(2):159–69.
Resnitzky D, et al. Acceleration of the G1/S phase transition by expression of cyclins D1 and E with an inducible system. Mol Cell Biol. 1994;14(3):1669–79.
Nishimoto T, Uzawa S, Schlegel R. Mitotic checkpoints. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1992;4(2):174–9.
Wolowiec D, Ffrench M. Cyclins A and B: redundancy and specificity. Pathol Biol (Paris). 1993;41(6):547–53.
Morgan DO. Principles of CDK regulation. Nature. 1995;374(6518):131–4.
Olashaw N, Pledger WJ. Paradigms of growth control: relation to Cdk activation. Sci STKE. 2002;2002(134):re7.
Dai Y, Grant S. Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2003;3(4):362–70.
Komander D, Rape M. The ubiquitin code. Annu Rev Biochem. 2012;81:203–29.
Hershko A, Ciechanover A. The ubiquitin system. Annu Rev Biochem. 1998;67:425–79.
Varshavsky A. The ubiquitin system, an immense realm. Annu Rev Biochem. 2012;81:167–76.
Eldridge AG, O’Brien T. Therapeutic strategies within the ubiquitin proteasome system. Cell Death Differ. 2010;17(1):4–13.
Hoeller D, Dikic I. Targeting the ubiquitin system in cancer therapy. Nature. 2009;458(7237):438–44.
Nalepa G, Rolfe M, Harper JW. Drug discovery in the ubiquitin-proteasome system. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2006;5(7):596–613.
Pickart CM. Mechanisms underlying ubiquitination. Annu Rev Biochem. 2001;70:503–33.
Kulathu Y, Komander D. Atypical ubiquitylation—the unexplored world of polyubiquitin beyond Lys48 and Lys63 linkages. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2012;13(8):508–23.
Baboshina OV, Haas AL. Novel multiubiquitin chain linkages catalyzed by the conjugating enzymes E2EPF and RAD6 are recognized by 26 S proteasome subunit 5. J Biol Chem. 1996;271(5):2823–31.
Schwarz LA, Patrick GN. Ubiquitin-dependent endocytosis, trafficking and turnover of neuronal membrane proteins. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2012;49(3):387–93.
Ulrich HD, Walden H. Ubiquitin signalling in DNA replication and repair. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2010;11(7):479–89.
Acconcia F, Sigismund S, Polo S. Ubiquitin in trafficking: the network at work. Exp Cell Res. 2009;315(9):1610–8.
Clague MJ, Coulson JM, Urbe S. Cellular functions of the DUBs. J Cell Sci. 2012;125(Pt 2):277–86.
Burrows JF, Johnston JA. Regulation of cellular responses by deubiquitinating enzymes: an update. Front Biosci. 2012;17:1184–200.
Fraile JM, et al. Deubiquitinases in cancer: new functions and therapeutic options. Oncogene. 2012;31(19):2373–88.
DeSalle LM, Pagano M. Regulation of the G1 to S transition by the ubiquitin pathway. FEBS Lett. 2001;490(3):179–89.
Li W, et al. Genome-wide and functional annotation of human E3 ubiquitin ligases identifies MULAN, a mitochondrial E3 that regulates the organelle’s dynamics and signaling. PLoS One. 2008;3(1):e1487.
Bedford L, et al. Ubiquitin-like protein conjugation and the ubiquitin-proteasome system as drug targets. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2011;10(1):29–46.
Deshaies RJ, Joazeiro CA. RING domain E3 ubiquitin ligases. Annu Rev Biochem. 2009;78:399–434.
Petroski MD, Deshaies RJ. Function and regulation of cullin-RING ubiquitin ligases. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2005;6(1):9–20.
Skaar JR, Pagano M. Control of cell growth by the SCF and APC/C ubiquitin ligases. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2009;21(6):816–24.
Rotin D, Kumar S. Physiological functions of the HECT family of ubiquitin ligases. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2009;10(6):398–409.
Metzger MB, Hristova VA, Weissman AM. HECT and RING finger families of E3 ubiquitin ligases at a glance. J Cell Sci. 2012;125(Pt 3):531–7.
Hua Z, Vierstra RD. The cullin-RING ubiquitin-protein ligases. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2011;62:299–334.
Sarikas A, Hartmann T, Pan ZQ. The cullin protein family. Genome Biol. 2011;12(4):220.
Duda DM, et al. Structural regulation of cullin-RING ubiquitin ligase complexes. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2011;21(2):257–64.
Frescas D, Pagano M. Deregulated proteolysis by the F-box proteins SKP2 and beta-TrCP: tipping the scales of cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008;8(6):438–49.
Zheng N, et al. Structure of the Cul1-Rbx1-Skp1-F boxSkp2 SCF ubiquitin ligase complex. Nature. 2002;416(6882):703–9.
Bai C, et al. SKP1 connects cell cycle regulators to the ubiquitin proteolysis machinery through a novel motif, the F-box. Cell. 1996;86(2):263–74.
Lipkowitz S, Weissman AM. RINGs of good and evil: RING finger ubiquitin ligases at the crossroads of tumour suppression and oncogenesis. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011;11(9):629–43.
McLean JR, et al. State of the APC/C: organization, function, and structure. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2011;46(2):118–36.
Schreiber A, et al. Structural basis for the subunit assembly of the anaphase-promoting complex. Nature. 2011;470(7333):227–32.
da Fonseca PC, et al. Structures of APC/C(Cdh1) with substrates identify Cdh1 and Apc10 as the D-box co-receptor. Nature. 2011;470(7333):274–8.
Buschhorn BA, et al. Substrate binding on the APC/C occurs between the coactivator Cdh1 and the processivity factor Doc1. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2011;18(1):6–13.
Jin L, et al. Mechanism of ubiquitin-chain formation by the human anaphase-promoting complex. Cell. 2008;133(4):653–65.
Glotzer M, Murray AW, Kirschner MW. Cyclin is degraded by the ubiquitin pathway. Nature. 1991;349(6305):132–8.
Pfleger CM, Kirschner MW. The KEN box: an APC recognition signal distinct from the D box targeted by Cdh1. Genes Dev. 2000;14(6):655–65.
Castro A, et al. The D-Box-activating domain (DAD) is a new proteolysis signal that stimulates the silent D-Box sequence of Aurora-A. EMBO Rep. 2002;3(12):1209–14.
Littlepage LE, Ruderman JV. Identification of a new APC/C recognition domain, the A box, which is required for the Cdh1-dependent destruction of the kinase Aurora-A during mitotic exit. Genes Dev. 2002;16(17):2274–85.
Araki M, et al. Degradation of origin recognition complex large subunit by the anaphase-promoting complex in Drosophila. EMBO J. 2003;22(22):6115–26.
Reis A, et al. The CRY box: a second APCcdh1-dependent degron in mammalian cdc20. EMBO Rep. 2006;7(10):1040–5.
Castro A, et al. Xkid is degraded in a D-box, KEN-box, and A-box-independent pathway. Mol Cell Biol. 2003;23(12):4126–38.
Skaar JR, Pagan JK, Pagano M. Mechanisms and function of substrate recruitment by F-box proteins. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2013;14(6):369–81.
Hao B, et al. Structure of a Fbw7-Skp1-cyclin E complex: multisite-phosphorylated substrate recognition by SCF ubiquitin ligases. Mol Cell. 2007;26(1):131–43.
Yoshida Y, et al. E3 ubiquitin ligase that recognizes sugar chains. Nature. 2002;418(6896):438–42.
D’Angiolella V, et al. SCF(Cyclin F) controls centrosome homeostasis and mitotic fidelity through CP110 degradation. Nature. 2010;466(7302):138–42.
Margottin-Goguet F, et al. Prophase destruction of Emi1 by the SCF(betaTrCP/Slimb) ubiquitin ligase activates the anaphase promoting complex to allow progression beyond prometaphase. Dev Cell. 2003;4(6):813–26.
Guardavaccaro D, et al. Control of meiotic and mitotic progression by the F box protein beta-Trcp1 in vivo. Dev Cell. 2003;4(6):799–812.
Fukushima H, et al. SCF-mediated Cdh1 degradation defines a negative feedback system that coordinates cell-cycle progression. Cell Rep. 2013;4(4):803–16.
Lukas C, et al. Accumulation of cyclin B1 requires E2F and cyclin-A-dependent rearrangement of the anaphase-promoting complex. Nature. 1999;401(6755):815–8.
Sorensen CS, et al. A conserved cyclin-binding domain determines functional interplay between anaphase-promoting complex-Cdh1 and cyclin A-Cdk2 during cell cycle progression. Mol Cell Biol. 2001;21(11):3692–703.
Wei W, et al. Degradation of the SCF component Skp2 in cell-cycle phase G1 by the anaphase-promoting complex. Nature. 2004;428(6979):194–8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Liu, P., Inuzuka, H., Wei, W. (2014). Introduction. In: SCF and APC E3 Ubiquitin Ligases in Tumorigenesis. SpringerBriefs in Cancer Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05026-3_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05026-3_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-05025-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-05026-3
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)