Abstract
So what are the implications of this general social science theory of entrepreneurship? How might it affect the behavior of entrepreneurs, education programming, research agendas, and the future redesign of the entrepreneurship discipline?
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The search for economic gain without reciprocal value.
References
Baer J (2012) Domain specificity of creativity: theory, research, and practice. J Creative Behav 46(1):16–29
Baumol W (1990) Entrepreneurship: productive, unproductive and destructive. J Polit Econ 98(5):893–921
Baumol WJ (2004) On entrepreneurship, growth and rent-seeking: Henry George updated. Am Econ 48(1):9–17
Blanchflower DG, Oswald AJ (2004) Well-being over time in Britain and the USA. J Public Econ 88:1359–1386
Blanchflower DG, Oswald AJ (2005) Happiness and the human development index: the paradox of Australia. Aust Econ Rev 38(3):307–318
Brush CG, Duhaime IM, Gartner WB, Stewart A, Katz JA, Hitt MA, Alvarez SA, Meyer GD, Venkataramn S (2003) Doctoral education in the field of entrepreneurship. J Manage 29(3):309–331
Chrisman JJ, McMullan WE (2000) A preliminary assessment of outsider assistance as a knowledge resource: the longer term impact of new venture counselling. Entrepren Theory Pract 24(3):37–54
Easterlin RA (1995) Will raising the incomes of all raise the happiness of all? J Econ Behav Organ 27:35–47
Gorton WA (2006) Karl Popper and the social sciences. State University of New York Press, Albany
Gottfredson MR, Hirschi T (1990) A general theory of crime. Stanford University Press, Stanford
Kuhn TS (1962) The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Machlup F (1978) Methodology of economics and other social sciences. Academic, New York
Maslow A (1968) Towards a psychology of being. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York
Mayer RE (1999) Fifty years of creativity research. In: Sternberg RJ (ed) Handbook of creativity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 449–460
McMullan WE, Gillin LM (1998) Developing technological start-up entrepreneurs: a case study of a graduate entrepreneurship programme at Swinburne University. Technovation 18(4):275–286
Payne R, Jones JG (1987) Social class and re-employment: changes in health and perceived financial circumstances. J Occup Behav 8(2):175–184
Peiro A (2006) Happiness, satisfaction and socio-economic conditions: some international evidence. J Socio-Econ 35:348–365
Pratt TC, Cullen FT (2000) The empirical status of Gottfredssons and Hirschi’s general theory of crime: a meta analysis. Criminology 38(3):931–964
Sarasvathy SD (2001) Causation and effectuation: toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Acad Manage Rev 26(2):243–288
Schumpeter JA (1911 [1934]) The theory of economic development. Oxford University Press, New York
Shane S (2003) A general theory of entrepreneurship: the individual-opportunity Nexus. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
Vesper KH (1996) New venture experience. Vector Books, Seattle
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
McMullan, W.E., Kenworthy, T.P. (2015). Some Implications and Conclusions. In: Creativity and Entrepreneurial Performance. Exploring Diversity in Entrepreneurship. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04726-3_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04726-3_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-04725-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-04726-3
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)