Skip to main content

Intelligent Instructional Design via Interactive Knowledge Graph Editing

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Learning Technologies and Systems (ICWL 2022, SETE 2022)

Abstract

The rapid emergence of knowledge graph (KG) research opens the opportunity for revolutionary educational applications. Most studies in this area use KGs as peripheral sources of educational materials rather than a primary tool for Instructional Design. Considerable effort is required to maintain the alignment between KGs and other elements of Instructional Design practice, such as syllabus, course plans, student learning objectives, and teaching outcome evaluation. To bridge such a gap, we present a novel framework named Knowledge Graph Reciprocal Instructional Design (KGRID), which employs KGs as an instructional design tool to organize learning units and instructional data. Viewing the two aspects as a unified ensemble achieves interactive and consistent course plan editing through manipulations of KGs. The included interactive course schedule editing tool distinguishes our framework from other timetabling approaches that only handle the initialization task. Managing instructional data in KG format is indispensable in establishing a foundation of mass instructional data collection for KG research. We envision a collaboration between the two disciplines. With these crucial functionalities and aspirations, KGRID outperforms the practice of replacing Instructional Design tables with concept maps. We present the system architecture, data flow, visualization, and algorithmic aspect of the editing tool.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Adnan, N.H., Ritzhaupt, A.D.: Software engineering design principles applied to instructional design: what can we learn from our sister discipline? TechTrends 62(1), 77–94 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aisami, R.S.: Learning styles and visual literacy for learning and performance. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 176, 538–545 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Al-Betar, M.A., Khader, A.T.: A harmony search algorithm for university course timetabling. Ann. Oper. Res. 194(1), 3–31 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Andrews, D.H., Goodson, L.A.: A comparative analysis of models of instructional design. J. Instr. Dev. 3(4), 2–16 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ayob, M., Jaradat, G.: Hybrid ant colony systems for course timetabling problems. In: 2009 2nd Conference on Data Mining and Optimization, pp. 120–126. IEEE (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Babaei, H., Karimpour, J., Hadidi, A.: A survey of approaches for university course timetabling problem. Comput. Ind. Eng. 86, 43–59 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bashir, R.S., Lee, S.P., Khan, S.U.R., Chang, V., Farid, S.: UML models consistency management: guidelines for software quality manager. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 36(6), 883–899 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Budoya, C., Kissaka, M., Mtebe, J.: Instructional design enabled agile method using ADDIE model and feature driven development method. Int. J. Educ. Dev. ICT 15(1) (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chen, P., Lu, Y., Zheng, V.W., Chen, X., Yang, B.: Knowedu: a system to construct knowledge graph for education. IEEE Access 6, 31553–31563 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cho, Y.H., Ding, N., Tawfik, A., Chávez, Ó.: Computer-supported collaborative concept mapping for learning to teach mathematics. J. Appl. Instr. Des. 4(1), 21-x33 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cicchetti, A., Ciccozzi, F., Pierantonio, A.: Multi-view approaches for software and system modelling: a systematic literature review. Softw. Syst. Model. 18(6), 3207–3233 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-018-00713-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cui, J., Yu, S.: Fostering deeper learning in a flipped classroom: effects of knowledge graphs versus concept maps. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 50(5), 2308–2328 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Dai, Y., Wang, S., Xiong, N.N., Guo, W.: A survey on knowledge graph embedding: approaches, applications and benchmarks. Electronics 9(5), 750 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Douglas, I.: Issues in software engineering of relevance to instructional design. TechTrends 50(5), 28–35 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Farrokhnia, M., Pijeira-Díaz, H.J., Noroozi, O., Hatami, J.: Computer-supported collaborative concept mapping: the effects of different instructional designs on conceptual understanding and knowledge co-construction. Comput. Educ. 142, 103640 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Herzig, S.J., Qamar, A., Reichwein, A., Paredis, C.J.: A conceptual framework for consistency management in model-based systems engineering. In: International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, vol. 54792, pp. 1329–1339 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hossain, S.I., Akhand, M.A.H., Shuvo, M.I.R., Siddique, N.H., Adeli, H.: Optimization of university course scheduling problem using particle swarm optimization with selective search. Expert Syst. Appl. 127, 9–24 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ji, S., Pan, S., Cambria, E., Marttinen, P., Philip, S.Y.: A survey on knowledge graphs: representation, acquisition, and applications. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. 33(2), 494–514 (2021)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Jia, B., Huang, X., Jiao, S.: Application of semantic similarity calculation based on knowledge graph for personalized study recommendation service. Educ. Sci.: Theory Pract. 18(6) (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Johnson-Barlow, E.M., Lehnen, C.: A scoping review of the application of systematic instructional design and instructional design models by academic librarians. J. Acad. Librarianship 47(5), 102382 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lewis, R., Paechter, B.: Application of the grouping genetic algorithm to university course timetabling. In: Raidl, G.R., Gottlieb, J. (eds.) EvoCOP 2005. LNCS, vol. 3448, pp. 144–153. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-31996-2_14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Lü, Z., Hao, J.: Adaptive tabu search for course timetabling. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 200(1), 235–244 (2010)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Lucas, F.J., Molina, F., Toval, A.: A systematic review of UML model consistency management. Inf. Softw. Technol. 51(12), 1631–1645 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Martin, F.: Instructional design and the importance of instructional alignment. Commun. Coll. J. Res. Pract. 35(12), 955–972 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Pinandito, A., Az-Zahra, H.M., Hirashima, T., Hayashi, Y.: User experience evaluation on computer-supported concept map authoring tool of kit-build concept map framework. In: 2019 International Conference on Sustainable Information Engineering and Technology (SIET), pp. 289–294. IEEE (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ranawat, R., Venkataraman, A., Subramanian, L.: Collectiveteach: a system to generate and sequence web-annotated lesson plans. In: COMPASS ’21: ACM SIGCAS Conference on Computing and Sustainable Societies, Virtual Event, Australia, 28 June 2021–2 July 2021, pp. 1–13. ACM (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Redeker, G.H.: An educational taxonomy for learning objects. In: Proceedings 3rd IEEE International Conference on Advanced Technologies, pp. 250–251. IEEE (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sabar, N.R., Ayob, M., Kendall, G., Qu, R.: A honey-bee mating optimization algorithm for educational timetabling problems. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 216(3), 533–543 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Shakhsi-Niaei, M., Abuei-Mehrizi, H.: An optimization-based decision support system for students’ personalized long-term course planning. Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ. 28(5), 1247–1264 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Shiau, D.: A hybrid particle swarm optimization for a university course scheduling problem with flexible preferences. Expert Syst. Appl. 38(1), 235–248 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Yao, S., Wang, R., Sun, S., Bu, D., Liu, J.: Joint embedding learning of educational knowledge graphs. In: Pinkwart, N., Liu, S. (eds.) Artificial Intelligence Supported Educational Technologies. AALT, pp. 209–224. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41099-5_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  32. Zou, X.: A survey on application of knowledge graph. J. Phys: Conf. Ser. 1487(1), 012016 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jerry C. K. Chan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Chan, J.C.K. et al. (2023). Intelligent Instructional Design via Interactive Knowledge Graph Editing. In: González-González, C.S., et al. Learning Technologies and Systems. ICWL SETE 2022 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13869. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-33023-0_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-33023-0_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-33022-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-33023-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics