Abstract
It is claimed that the innovative use of educational technology combined with appropriate pedagogical strategies can lead to improved student outcomes. However, teachers face difficulties in adopting educational technology and novel pedagogical methods as this involves acquiring complex new knowledge. Combined with training, Learning Analytics dashboards – artifacts which mediate teachers’ learning in technology-enhanced environments – can aid them in this task. Using student engagement as an example, we present the prototype of a theory-driven dashboard that can help teachers to better understand and implement new instructional methods in technology-enhanced learning environments. We describe here our needs analysis, design, and evaluation process and outcomes, reflecting upon how teachers can benefit from using thoughtfully-designed LA dashboards in professional development scenarios.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
The Difference Between Emergency Remote Teaching and Online Learning. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning. Accessed 14 Apr 2021
Cuban, L.: Oversold and Underused: Computers in the Classroom. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (2001)
Keengwe, J., Onchwari, G.: Fostering meaningful student learning through constructivist pedagogy and technology integration. Int. J. Inf. Commun. Technol. Educ. 7(4), 1–10 (2011)
Tunjera, N., Chigona, A.: Teacher educators’ appropriation of TPACK-SAMR models for 21st century pre-service teacher preparation. Int. J. Inf. Commun. Technol. Educ. 16(3), 126–140 (2020)
Taber, K.S.: The role of new educational technology in teaching and learning: a constructivist perspective on digital learning. In: Marcus-Quinn, A., Hourigan, T. (eds.) Handbook on Digital Learning for K-12 Schools, pp. 397–412. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33808-8_24
Fullan, M., Langworthy, M.: A rich Seam: How New Pedagogies Find Deep Learning. Pearson, London (2014)
van Thiel, L.: Professional learning design framework: supporting technology integration in Alberta. Res. Learn. Technol. 26 (2018)
Gašević, D., Dawson, S., Siemens, G.: Let’s not forget: Learning Analytics are about learning. TechTrends 59(1), 64–71 (2015)
Wise, A.F., Shaffer, D.W.: Why theory matters more than ever in the age of big data. J. Learn. Anal. 2(2), 5–13 (2015)
Jivet, I., Scheffel, M., Specht, M., Drachsler, H.: License to evaluate: preparing learning analytics dashboards for educational practice. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, pp. 31–40. ACM, New York (2018)
Matcha, W., Uzir, N.A., Gašević, D., Pardo, A.: A systematic review of empirical studies on learning analytics dashboards: a self-regulated learning perspective. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 13(2), 226–245 (2020)
Rodríguez-Triana, M.J., Martínez-Monés, A., Asensio-Pérez, J.I., Dimitriadis, Y.: Scripting and monitoring meet each other: aligning learning analytics and learning design to support teachers in orchestrating CSCL situations. Br. J. Edu. Technol. 46(2), 330–343 (2015)
Dollinger, M., Lodge, J.M.: Co-creation strategies for learning analytics. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, pp. 97–101. ACM, New York (2018)
Holstein, K., McLaren, B.M., Aleven, V.: Intelligent tutors as teachers’ aides: exploring teacher needs for realtime analytics in blended classrooms. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, pp. 257–266. ACM, New York (2017)
Mandinach, E.B., Gummer, E.: A systemic view of implementing data literacy in educator preparation. Educ. Res. 42(1), 30–37 (2013)
Marsh, J., Farrell, C.: How leaders can support teachers with data-driven decision making: a framework for understanding capacity building. Educ. Manage. Adm. Leadersh. 43(2), 269–289 (2015)
Kent, C., Cukurova, M.: Investigating collaboration as a process with theory-driven Learning Analytics. J. Learn. Anal. 7(1), 59–71 (2020)
van Leeuwen, A., Rummel, N.: Comparing Teachers’ use of mirroring and advising dashboards. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, pp. 26–34. ACM, New York (2020)
Holstein, K., McLaren, B.M., Aleven, V.: The classroom as a dashboard: co-designing wearable cognitive augmentation for K-12 teachers. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, pp. 79–88. ACM, New York (2018)
Martinez-Maldonado, R.: A handheld classroom dashboard: teachers’ perspectives on the use of real-time collaborative learning analytics. Int. J. Comput.-Support. Collab. Learn. 14(3), 383–411 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-019-09308-z
Echeverria, V., Martinez-Maldonado, R., Buckingham Shum, S., Chiluiza, K., Granda, R., Conati, C.: Exploratory versus explanatory visual learning analytics: driving teachers’ attention through educational data storytelling. J. Learn. Anal. 5(3), 72–97 (2018)
Martinez-Maldonado, R., Echeverria, V., Fernandez Nieto, G., Buckingham Shum, S.: From data to insights: a layered storytelling approach for multimodal Learning Analytics. In: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–15. ACM, New York (2020)
Wang, F., Hannafin, M.J.: Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educ. Tech. Res. Dev. 53(4), 5–23 (2005)
Skinner, E., Furrer, C., Marchand, G., Kindermann, T.: Engagement and disaffection in the classroom: Part of a larger motivational dynamic? J. Educ. Psychol. 100(4), 765–781 (2008)
Wolters, C.A.: Advancing achievement goal theory: using goal structures and goal orientations to predict students’ motivation, cognition, and achievement. J. Educ. Psychol. 96(2), 236–250 (2004)
Datnow, A., Hubbard, L.: Teachers’ use of assessment data to inform instruction: lessons from the past and prospects for the future. Teach. Coll. Rec. 117(4), 1–26 (2015)
Sergis, S., Sampson, D.G.: Teaching and learning analytics to support teacher inquiry: a systematic literature review. In: Peña-Ayala, A. (ed.) Learning Analytics: Fundaments, Applications, and Trends. SSDC, vol. 94, pp. 25–63. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52977-6_2
Fredricks, J.A., Blumenfeld, P.C., Paris, A.H.: School engagement: potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Rev. Educ. Res. 74, 59–109 (2004)
Pianta, R., Hamre, B., Allen, J.: Teacher-student relationships and engagement: conceptualizing, measuring, and improving the capacity of classroom interactions. In: Christenson, S., Reschly, A., Wylie, C. (eds.) Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, pp. 365–386. Springer, Boston (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_17
Pohl, A.J.: Strategies and interventions for promoting cognitive engagement. In: Reschly, A.L., Pohl, A.J., Christenson, S.L. (eds.) Student Engagement, pp. 253–280. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37285-9_14
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Khulbe, M., Tammets, K. (2021). Scaffolding Teacher Learning During Professional Development with Theory-Driven Learning Analytics. In: Zhou, W., Mu, Y. (eds) Advances in Web-Based Learning – ICWL 2021. ICWL 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13103. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90785-3_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90785-3_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-90784-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-90785-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)