Sub-regional Scale Commitments and Devolution from 2010 to 2020

Vlahos, Nick

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-48729-4_5

Nick Vlahos²

231 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter discusses the political economy of market-led institutional reform and economic governance from 2010 to 2020, focusing on dilemmas associated with austerity, cluster economics and devolution, and how tensions within these interconnected processes have inflamed national as well as (intra)regional and (intra)local contests.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Chapter: USD 29.95; Price excludes VAT (USA)

eBook: USD 84.99; Price excludes VAT (USA)

Softcover Book: USD 109.99; Price excludes VAT (USA)

Hardcover Book: USD 109.99; Price excludes VAT (USA)

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

1.
Paul Johnson and Daniel Chandler, “The Coalition and the Economy,” in The Coalition Effect, 2010–2015, ed. Anthony Seldon and Mike Finn (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015).
2.
Jones, Cities and Regions in Crisis, 9, 17.
3.
G. Brownlow, “Practice Running Ahead of Theory? Political Economy and the Economic Lessons of UK Devolution,” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 10, 3 (2017): 1; Daniel Bailey, “Economic Renewal Through Devolution? Tax Reform and the Uneven Geographies of the Economic Dividend,” Competition & Change 21, 1 (2017): 4.
4.
Ben Clift, “The UK Macroeconomic Policy Debate and the British Growth Crisis: Debt and Deficit Discourse in the Great Recession,” in The British Growth Crisis: The Search for a New Model, ed. Jeremy Green, Colin Hay, and Peter Taylor-Gooby (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015), 159.
5.
Peter Taylor-Gooby, “Public Policy Futures: A Left Trilemma?” in The British Growth Crisis: The Search for a New Model, ed. Jeremy Green, Colin Hay, and Peter Taylor-Gooby (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015), 127.
6.
Hood and Himaz, A Century of Fiscal Squeeze Politics, 191–192.
7.
Johnson and Chandler, “The Coalition and the Economy,” 172, 174, 176.
8.
Peter Kerr, Christopher Byrne and Emma Foster, “Theorising Cameronism,” Political Studies Review 9 (2011): 198.
9.
Craig Berry, “Introduction: What (Is) Industrial Strategy?” In What We Really Mean When We Talk About Industrial Strategy, ed. Craig Berry (Manchester Metropolitan University, 2018).
10.
James Silverwood and Richard Woodward, “Still ‘picking winners’: The Political History of UK Industrial Strategy,” in What We Really Mean When We Talk About Industrial Strategy, ed. Craig Berry (Manchester Metropolitan University, 2018).
11.
Silverwood and Woodward, “Still ‘picking winners.’”
12.
Diane Coyle and Marianne Sensier, “The Imperial Treasury: Appraisal Methodology and Regional Economic Performance,” The University of Manchester Economics Discussion Paper Series EDP-1901 (2019): 3; Phillip McCann, The UK Regional-National Economic Problem: Geography, Globalisation and Governance (New York: Routledge, 2016).
13.
James Silverwood and Richard Woodward, “From Maggie to May: Forty Years of (De)industrial Strategy,” Political Quarterly 89, 4 (2018).
14.
Stewart Lansley, “Tackling Inequality is an Economic Imperative,” Inequalities in the UK: New Discourses, Evolutions and Actions, ed. David Fée and Anémone Kober-Smith (Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited, 2018).
15.
Ron Martin, Andy Pike, Peter Tyler and Ben Gardiner, “Spatially Rebalancing the UK Economy: The New for a New Policy Model,” Regional Studies 50, 2 (2015): 3–7.
16.
Kevin R. Cox, “Territory, Scale, and Why Capitalism Matters,” Territory, Politics, Governance 1, 1 (2013): 56.
17.
Jamie Peck, “Political Economies of Scale: Fast Policy, Interscalar Relations, and Neoliberal Workfare,” Economic Geography 78, 3 (2002): 339–340.
18.
Brownlow, “Practice Running Ahead of Theory?, 6–7.
19.
Colin Hay and Craig Berry, “The Great ‘Rebalancing’ Act: The Construction and Implementation of an Economic Imperative for Exceptional Times,” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 18, 1 (2014).
20.
Markus Grillitsch and Bjørn Asheim, “Place-Based Innovation Policy for Industrial Diversification in Regions,” European Planning Studies 28, 8 (2018): 1647; Jing Xiao, Ron Boschma and Martin Andersson, “Industrial Diversification in Europe: The Differentiated Role of Relatedness,” Economic Geography 94, 5 (2018): 515.
21.
Nicola Cortinovis, Jing Xiao, Ron Boschma, and Frank van Oort, “Quality of Government and Social Capital as Drivers of Regional Diversification,” Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography 1610 (2016): 2.
22.
Miroslav N. Jovanocić, “Spatial Location of Firms and Industries: Is Local Superior to Global?,” in Contemporary Issues in Urban and Regional Economics, ed. Lawrence Yee (New York: Nova Science Publishers, Inc., 2005), 34–35, 38.
23.
Jose-Luis Hervas-Oliver, Francisca Sempere-Ripoll, Ronald Rojas Alvarado, and Sofia Estelles-Miguel, “Agglomerations and Firm Performance: Who Benefits and How Much?,” Regional Studies 52, 3 (2018): 339–341.
24.
For a detailed analysis of the types of segregation and inequality caused by urban clustering, see Richard Florida, The New Urban Crisis: How Our Cities are Increasing Inequality, Deepening Segregation, and Failing the Middle Class-and What We Can Do About It (New York: Basic Books, 2017).
25.
Jovanocić, “Spatial Location of Firms and Industries,” 31.
26.
For a series of nuanced discussions covering industrial strategy, policy and development, see Craig Berry ed., What We Really Mean When We Talk About Industrial Strategy (Manchester Metropolitan University, 2018). An especially relevant analysis comes from the Industrial Strategy Commission’s 2017 Final Report. It argues that strategic economic management across the UK state should be focused on using the state’s powers to coordinate and convene, pool risks, provide public goods and transform economic development with a long-term approach. It also discusses: ensuring adequate investment in infrastructure, decarbonization of the energy economy, developing a sustainable health and social care system, unlocking long-term investment, supporting high-value industries and building export capacities, and enabling growth in all parts of the UK. See the Industrial Strategy Commission, The Final Report of the Industrial Strategy Commission (The University of Manchester and the Sheffield Political Economy Research Institute, 2017).
27.
Larry Elliott and Dan Atkinson, Going South: Why Britain Will Have a Third World Economy by 2014 (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012), 73, 76.
28.
Hay and Craig Berry, “The Great ‘Rebalancing’ Act,” 13.
29.
A. Davis and C. Walsh, “The Role of the State in the Financialization of the UK Economy,” Political Studies 64, 3 (2016).
30.
John Christensen, Nick Shaxson, and Duncan Wigan, “The Finance Curse: Britain and the World Economy,” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 18, 1 (2016).
31.
Vladimír Pažitka and Dariusz Wójcik, “Cluster Dynamics of Financial Centres in the UK: Do Connected Firms Grow Faster?,” Regional Studies 53, 7 (2019): 1017–1018, 1026.
32.
This section does not focus on electoral reform as one of these constitutional issues; however, it is important to note that in 2011, the UK’s first referendum to switch from a single-member plurality model to the alternative vote was held. It did not bring back the results the Liberal Democrats would have hoped for; 42.2% of the population turned out to vote, with 42.2% against change and 32.1% in favour of reform.
33.
Martin Loughlin and Cal Viney, “The Coalition and the Constitution,” in The Coalition Effect 2010–2015, ed. Anthony Seldon and Mike Finn (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015), 60.
34.
Neil McGarvey, “The Coalition beyond Westminster,” in The Coalition Effect 2010–2015, ed. Anthony Seldon and Mike Finn (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015), 90.
35.
Tom Mullen, “The Scottish Independence Referendum,” Journal of Law and Society 41, 4 (2014), 631.
36.
Sandra Eden, “Scotland Act 2016: Further Tax Powers Come North,” The Edinburgh Law Review 20 (2016), 377.
37.
Andy Cumbers, “The Scottish Independence Referendum and the Dysfunctional Economic Geography of the UK,” Political Geography 41 (2014), 33, 36.
38.
Jamie Morgan and Heikki Patomäki, “Introduction: Special Forum on Brexit,” in Brexit and the Political Economy of Fragmentation: Things Fall Apart, ed. Jamie Morgan and Heikki Patomäki (New York: Routledge, 2018), 2.
39.
Robert Saunders, “A Tale of Two Referendums: 1975 and 2016,” The Political Quarterly 87, 3 (2016): 319.
40.
Matthew J. Goodwin and Oliver Heath, “The 2016 Referendum, Brexit and the Left Behind: An Aggregate-Level Analysis of the Result,” The Political Quarterly 87, 3 (2016): 324.
41.
Anand Menon and Brigid Fowler, “Hard or Soft? The Politics of Brexit,” The National Institute Economic Review 238 (2016): R5.
42.
Christopher Huggins, “Did EU Regional Spending Affect the Brexit Referendum,” Regional studies, Regional Science 5, 1 (2018), 390, 393.
43.
Charles Grant, “Theresa May and Her Six-Pack of Difficult Deals,” Insight, Centre for European Reform (2016).
44.
Jessop, “The Organic Crisis of the British State,” 36, 38.
45.
Social Mobility Commission, State of the Nation 2017: Social Mobility in Great Britain (2017).
46.
John Tomaney and Andy Pike, “Local Industrial Strategy and ‘Left-Behind’ Regions, in What We Really Mean When We Talk About Industrial Strategy, ed. Craig Berry (Manchester Metropolitan University, 2018), 140.
47.
Gordon MacLeod and Martin Jones, “Explaining ‘Brexit Capital’: Uneven Development and the Austerity State,” Space and Polity 22, 2 (2018): 120.
48.
Social Mobility Commission, State of the Nation 2018–2019: Social Mobility in Great Britain (2019).
49.
Scott Lavery, “The UK’s Growth Model, Business Strategy and Brexit,” in Diverging Capitalisms: Britain, the City of London and Europe, ed. Colin Hay and Daniel Bailey (Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019), 152.
50.
Jamie Morgan, “Brexit: Be Careful What You Wish For?,” in Brexit and the Political Economy of Fragmentation: Things Fall Apart, ed. Jamie Morgan and Heikki Patomäki (New York: Routledge, 2018), 21–24.
51.
McHarg and Mitchell, “Brexit and Scotland,” 518.
52.
Morgan, “Brexit: Be Careful What You Wish For?,” 5; Boris Kagarlitsky, “Brexit and the Future of the Left,” in Brexit and the Political Economy of Fragmentation: Things Fall Apart, ed. Jamie Morgan and Heikki Patomäki (New York: Routledge, 2018), 7–8.
53.
Colin Hay and Daniel Bailey, “Introduction: Brexit and European Capitalism—A Parting of the Waves?,” in Diverging Capitalisms: Britain, the City of London and Europe, ed. Colin Hay and Daniel Bailey (Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019), 7.
54.
Kagarlitsky, “Brexit and the Future of the Left,” 7–8.
55.
Owen Worth, “Reviving Hayek’s Dream,” in Brexit and the Political Economy of Fragmentation: Things Fall Apart, ed. Jamie Morgan and Heikki Patomäki (New York: Routledge, 2018), 8.
56.
Lavery, “The UK’s Growth Model, Business Strategy and Brexit,” 153.
57.
Pažitka and Wójcik, “Cluster Dynamics of Financial Centres in the UK,” 1026–1027.
58.
Jan Toporowski, “Brexit and the Discreet Charm of Haute Finance,” in Vote Leave: The Political Economy of Brexit, ed. David Bailey and Leslie Budd (Essex: Agenda Publishing, 2017), 40, 41.
59.
Edgar L. W. Morgenroth, “Examining Consequences for Trade: Integration and Disintegration Effects,” in Vote Leave: The Political Economy of Brexit, ed. David Bailey and Leslie Budd (Essex: Agenda Publishing, 2017), 31.
60.
Mark Thissen, Frank van Oort, Philip McCann, Rauel Ortega-Argilés, and Trond Husby “The Implications of Brexit for UK and EU Regional Competitiveness,” Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper TI 2019–061/VIII, 17–18, 21–22, 24.
61.
Silke Trommer, “Post-Brexit Trade Policy Autonomy as Pyrrhic Victory: Being a Middle Power in a Contested Trade Regime,” in Brexit and the Political Economy of Fragmentation: Things Fall Apart, ed. Jamie Morgan and Heikki Patomäki (New York: Routledge, 2018), 98, 100, 104.
62.
Guillaume Sacriste and Antoine Vauchez, “The Euro-ization of the Europe: The Extra-mural Rise of a Government of the Euro and the Redefinition of the ‘European Projects’,” in How to Democratize Europe Stéphanie Hennette, et al. (London: Harvard University Press, 2019), 10.
63.
Alexander Schellinger and Philipp Steinberg, “Introduction: The Future of the Eurozone,” in The Future of the Eurozone: How to Keep Europe Together, ed. Alexander Schellinger and Philipp Steinberg (Wetzlar: Transcript Verlag, 2017), 12–13.
64.
Christian Beck, “Has the euro Robbed Europe of democracy?,” in The Future of the Eurozone: How to Keep Europe Together, ed. Alexander Schellinger and Philipp Steinberg (Wetzlar: Transcript Verlag, 2017), 22; Henrik Enderlein, “The flaws in the design of the Economic and Monetary Union,” in The Future of the Eurozone: How to Keep Europe Together, ed. Alexander Schellinger and Philipp Steinberg (Wetzlar: Transcript Verlag, 2017), 44.
65.
Sacriste and Vauchez, “The Euro-ization of the Europe,” 17–19, 29, 33.
66.
Stéphanie Hennette, Thomas Piketty, Guillaume Sacriste and Antoine Vauchez, “Introduction,” in How to Democratize Europe, ed. Stéphanie Hennette et al. (London: Harvard University Press, 2019), 1–3, 63–65.
67.
Marjorie Kelly and Ted Howard, The Making of Democratic Economy: Building Prosperity for the Many, Not Just the Few (Oakland: Berrett-Koehler Publishers Inc.), 18, 99–102.
68.
Vivien Lowndes and Alison Gardner, “Local Governance Under the Conservatives: Super-Austerity, Devolution and the ‘Smarter State’” Local Government Studies 42, 3 (2016).
69.
Ron Martin and Ben Gardiner, “Reviving the ‘Northern Powerhouse’ and Spatially Rebalancing the British Economy: The Scale of the Challenge,” Working Paper 4, ESRC-Funded Research Project Under the ESRC Urban Transformation Initiative (2017).
70.
Carina Schneider and Clémentine Cottineau, “Decentralisation Versus Territorial Inequality: A Comparative Review of English City Region Policy Discourse,” Urban Science 3, 90 (2019): 4.
71.
Nick Clarke and Allan Cochrane, “Geographies and Politics of Localism: The Localism of the United Kingdom’s Coalition Government,” Political Geography 34 (2013): 12.
72.
Schneider and Cottineau, “Decentralisation Versus Territorial Inequality,” 2.
73.
Shaw and Tewdwr-Jones, “Disorganised Devolution,” 221.
74.
Tony Travers, “Funding Combined Authorities and City Regions,” Governing England: Devolution and Funding, British Academy for the Humanities and Social Sciences (2018): 64, 66.
75.
Claudio De Magalhães, “Business Improvement Districts in England and the (Private?) Governance of Urban Spaces,” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 32 (2014): 916–917.
76.
Danny MacKinnon, Andrew Cumbers and David Featherstone, “Local Development and Regional Economic Development in Britain,” in The British Growth Crisis: The Search for a New Model, ed. Jeremy Green, Colin Hay, and Peter Taylor-Gooby (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015), 211–212, 214–215.
77.
Lowndes and Gardner, “Local Governance Under the Conservatives,” 358–359, 362–364, 368.
78.
Keith Shaw and Mark Tewdwr-Jones, “Disorganised Devolution”: Reshaping Metropolitan Goverance in England in a Period of Austerity,” Raumforschung und Raumordnung—Spatial Research and Planning 75, 3 (2017).
79.
Etherington and Jones, “The City-Region Chimera,” 13.
80.
David Waite and Kevin Morgan, “City Deals in the Polycentric State: The Spaces and Politics of Metrophilia in the UK,” Urban and Regional Studies 26, 4 (2019).
81.
David Beel, Martin Jones and Ian Rees Jones, “Elite City-Deals for Economic Growth? Problematizing the Complexities of Devolution, City-Region Building, and the (Re)positioning of Civil Society,” Space and Polity 22, 3 (2018): 313–315.
82.
Neil Lee, “Powerhouse of Cards? Understanding the ‘Northern Powerhouse’,” Regional Studies 51, 3 (2017): 479, 482.
83.
Martin and Gardiner, “Reviving the ‘Northern Powerhouse,’” 20.
84.
Coyle and Sensier, “The Imperial Treasury,” 3, 11–12.
85.
Lee, “Powerhouse of Cards?,” 482.
86.
Janice Morphet, Changing Contexts in Spatial Planning: New Directions in Policies and Practices (Abingdon: Routledge, 2019), 6, 28, 31, 69, 74, 81.
87.
Claire Colomb and John Tomaney, “Territorial Politics, Devolution and Spatial Planning in the UK: Results, Prospects, Lessons,” Planning Practice and Research 31, 1 (2016): 11.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Toronto, ON, Canada
Nick Vlahos

Authors

Nick Vlahos
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Vlahos, N. (2020). Sub-regional Scale Commitments and Devolution from 2010 to 2020. In: The Political Economy of Devolution in Britain from the Postwar Era to Brexit. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48729-4_5

Download citation

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48729-4_5
Published: 30 June 2020
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-48728-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-48729-4
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics