Skip to main content
  • 69 Accesses

Abstract

In the previous chapters, I discussed the methodological premises of a transrational peace research with particular emphasis on the self. I have conceptualized different modes of knowing; I have explored the potential of this type of research; and I have highlighted some of the productive challenges that could be encountered along the way. As a next step, I want to turn to the research process itself and propose a systematization. This is intended as an orientation for peace researchers. It is not intended as a prescription of how a research process (transrational or otherwise) should unfold, nor is it a factual statement claiming that research always unfolds in this manner. This is not my intention. The map is not the territory. Any map hides at least as much as it reveals. Still, a map can provide pointers, can give orientation and be useful on the journey.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For related approaches, see Janesick (1998) or Moustakas (1990). Janesick also uses dance as a metaphor for describing the process of qualitative research, while Moustakas divides the process into the six phases of initial engagement, immersion, incubation, illumination, explication and creative synthesis.

  2. 2.

    In her work on reflexive research, Kim Etherington (2004) emphasizes the importance of the relational aspects of supervision for MA and PhD students when researching their theses or dissertations. Often overlooked, studies show the quality of the relation to be important for the completion rates particularly of PhD students within the Social Sciences (Etherington 2004, 165). Particularly for students using the self as resource, this requires a supervisor who is willing and able to also accompany the personal processes involved in the research. Such supervision, hence, is also part of academic facilitation as described in the second part of this text.

  3. 3.

    For example, healing experiences, moments of bliss, great insight or revelation, experiences of peace.

  4. 4.

    For example, experiences of desolation, hurt, trauma or violence.

  5. 5.

    The more serene and calm experiences that do not provide such an emotional high or low as peak or nadir experiences and, therefore, always have a cognitive or noetic quality according to Maslow (1994, xiv).

  6. 6.

    Saturation does not mean completion or exhaustion. In principle, it is always possible to go deeper still, do yet another interview, add yet another source and hence deepen or broaden one’s own understanding. For most topics, just the literature that is already available spans libraries. Saturation therefore does not mean exhaustive depth, but sufficient depth. It can be defined as the moment when a topic has been researched thoroughly, so that “researching further yields only repeated patterning and themes” (Marshall 2016, 6).

  7. 7.

    The following overview renders different writing styles. Of course, a more functional classification along the lines of descriptive, interpretive, structural, categorical, predictive, explanatory, etc. would also be possible (cf. Wertz et al. 2011, 93).

  8. 8.

    This essay by Laurel Richardson and Elizabeth Adams St. Pierre has recently been republished in the fifth edition of The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (Denzin and Lincoln 2018). The four criteria suggested in the original essay remain unchanged.

  9. 9.

    As suggested by Laurel Richardson, the four criteria are: substantive contribution, aesthetic merit, reflexivity and impact. To this, I have added plausibility and congruence as a separate fifth criterion, which Richardson includes under substantive contribution.

References

  • Ackerman, Diane. 1990. A Natural History of the Senses. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, Tony E., Stacey Holman Jones, and Carolyn Ellis. 2015. Autoethnography: Understanding Qualitative Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Rosemarie. 2001. ‘Embodied Writing and Reflections on Embodiment.’ Journal of Transpersonal Psychology 33 (2): 83–98. http://depthpsychotherapy.pbworks.com/f/Embodied%2BWriting.pdf.

  • Anderson, Rosemarie, and William Braud. 1998. Transpersonal Research Methods for the Social Sciences: Honoring Human Experience. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, Robert. 1995. The Gift of Stories: Practical and Spiritual Applications of Autobiography, Life Stories and Personal Mythmaking. Westport: Bergin & Garvey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behar, Ruth. 1996. The Vulnerable Observer: Anthropology that Breaks Your Heart. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brantmeier, Edward J. 2013. ‘Pedagogy of Vulnerability: Definitions, Assumptions and Applications.’ In Re-envisioning Higher Education: Embodied Pathways to Wisdom and Social Transformation, edited by Jing Lin, Rebecca L. Oxford, and Edward J. Brantmeier, 95–107. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, Joseph. 2008. The Hero with a Thousand Faces. Novato: New World Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements, Jennifer. 2011. ‘Organic Inquiry: Research in Partnership with Spirit.’ In Transforming Self and Other Through Research: Transpersonal Research Methods and Skills for the Human Sciences and Humanities, 131–160. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, Kimberlé. 1991. ‘Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence Against Women of Color.’ Stanford Law Review 43 (6): 1241–1299. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1229039.

  • Davis, Kathy. 2014. ‘Intersectionality as Critical Methodology.’ In Writing Academic Texts Differently. Intersectional Feminist Methodologies and the Playful Art of Writing, edited by Nina Lykke, 17–29. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, Gilles, and Félix Guattari. 2005. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, Norman K. 2014. Interpretive Authoethnography. 2nd ed. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, Norman K. 2016. The Qualitative Manifesto: A Call to Arms. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, Norman K., and Yvonna S. Lincoln, eds. 2011. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. 4th ed. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, Norman K., and Yvonna S. Lincoln, eds. 2018. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. 5th ed. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich, Wolfgang. 2013. Elicitive Conflict Transformation and the Transrational Shift in Peace Politics, Many Peaces Series Volume 2. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellingson, Laura L. 2011. ‘Analysis and Representation Across the Continuum.’ In The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, 4th ed., edited by Norman K. Denzin and Yvonna S. Lincoln, 595–610. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, Carolyn. 2004. The Ethnographic I: A Methodological Novel About Autoethnography. Walnut Creek: Altamira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etherington, Kim. 2004. Becoming a Reflexive Researcher: Using Our Selves in Research. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faulkner, Sandra L. 2009. Poetry as Method: Reporting Research Through Verse. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, Jan. 1998. ‘Knowing Through Moving.’ In Transpersonal Research Methods for the Social Sciences: Honoring Human Experience, by Rosemarie Anderson and William Braud, 184–186. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, Steven, and Meredith Little. 1998. The Four Shields: The Initiatory Seasons of Human Nature. Big Pine: Lost Borders Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, Stephen, and Robert Dilts. 2011. The Hero’s Journey: A Voyage of Self-Discovery. Carmarthen: Crown House Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulowski, Rebecca. 2018. ‘On the Flesh of Violence: The (Phenomenological) Dilemma in Researching Violence and Its Transrational Transformation.’ In Transrational Resonances: Echoes to the Many Peaces, edited by Josefina Echavarría Alvarez, Daniela Ingruber, and Norbert Koppensteiner, 167–192. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inayatullah, Naeem. 2011. ‘Falling and Flying: An Introduction.’ In Autobiographical International Relations, edited by Naeem Inayatullah, 1–12. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiller, Patrick T., and Julia Chaitin. 2014. ‘Their Lives, Our Peace: Narrative Inquiry in Peace and Conflict Studies Research.’ In Peace and Conflict Studies Research: A Qualitative Perspective, edited by Robin Cooper and Laura Finley, 137–160. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janesick, Valerie J. 1998. ‘The Dance of Qualitative Research Design: Metaphor, Methodolatry and Meaning.’ In Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry, edited by Norman K. Denzin and Yvonna S. Lincoln, 35–55. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Josselson, Ruthellen. 2011. ‘Narrative Research. Constructing, Deconstructing and Reconstructing Story.’ In Five Ways of Doing Qualitative Analysis. Phenomenological Psychology, Grounded Theory, Discourse Analysis, Narrative Research, and Intuitive Inquiry, edited by Wertz, Frederick J., Kathy Charmaz, Linda M. McMullen, Ruthellen Josselson, Rosemarie Anderson and Emalinda McSpadden, 224–242. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Josselson, Ruthellen. 2013. Interviewing for Qualitative Inquiry: A Relational Approach. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederach, John Paul. 2005. The Moral Imagination: The Art and Soul of Building Peace. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • London, Robert. 2016. ‘The Enneagram: A Spiritual Perspective for Addressing Significant Problems Through Research.’ In Toward a Spiritual Research Paradigm: Exploring New Ways of Knowing, Researching and Being, edited by Jing Lin, Rebecca L. Oxford, and Tom Culham, 97–126. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, Jean-Francois. 2002. The Differend: Phrases in Dispute. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, Judi. 2016. First Person Action Research: Living Life as Inquiry. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, Abraham H. 1994. Religions, Values and Peak Experiences. New York: Penguin Compass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moustakas, Clark. 1990. Heuristic Research: Design, Methodology and Applications. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1974. The Gay Science: With a Prelude in Rhymes and an Appendix in Songs. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1982. ‘Thus Spoke Zarathustra: A Book for All and None.’ In The Portable Nietzsche, edited and translated by Walter Kaufmann, 103–493. New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, Genie, and Arthur Hastings. 2015. ‘Exploring the Nature of Exceptional Human Experiences: Recognizing, Understanding and Appreciating EHEs.’ In The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of Transpersonal Psychology, edited by Harris L. Friedman and Glenn Hartelius, 333–351. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelias, Ronald J. 2004. A Methodology of the Heart: Evoking Academic & Daily Life. Walnut Creek: Altamira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, Michael. 2009. The Tacit Dimension. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rebillot, Paul. 1993. The Call to Adventure: Bringing the Hero’s Journey to Daily Life. San Francisco: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, Laurel, and Elizabeth Adams St. Pierre. 2005. ‘Writing: A Method of Inquiry.’ In The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, 3rd ed., edited by Norman K. Denzin and Yvonna S. Lincoln, 959–978. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romanyshyn, Robert D. 2007. The Wounded Researcher: Research with Soul in Mind. New Orleans: Spring Journal Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Manen, Max. 2014. Phenomenology of Practice: Meaning-Giving Methods in Phenomenological Research and Writing. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertz, Frederick J., Kathy Charmaz, Linda M. McMullen, Ruthellen Josselson, Rosemarie Anderson, and Emalinda McSpadden. 2011. Five Ways of Doing Qualitative Analysis: Phenomenological Psychology, Grounded Theory, Discourse Analysis, Narrative Research and Intuitive Inquiry. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, Rhea A. 1998. ‘Becoming More Human as We Work: The Reflexive Role of Exceptional Human Experience.’ In Transpersonal Research Methods for the Social Sciences: Honoring Human Experience, by Rosemarie Anderson and William Braud, 128–145. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Norbert Koppensteiner .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Koppensteiner, N. (2020). The Rhythms of Research. In: Transrational Peace Research and Elicitive Facilitation . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46067-9_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics