Abstract
Chapter 5 presents an analysis of the Structural Inquiry of Stigmatized Englishes (SISE) approach data centered on students’ race and gender, specifically, how their identity factors correlate with their likeliness to experience and acknowledge a shift in their language attitudes. The data show that, while the approach is overwhelmingly successful with female students and students of color, a significant percentage of White male students emerge as a group that shows resistance to the approach. Several case studies are analyzed to illustrate this trend, and the chapter concludes by proposing strategies for attempting to reach those in this group—and others who may be resistant to experiencing and acknowledging attitudinal shifts—both within and outside the classroom.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
For further details regarding the students’ demographics and personal backgrounds, see Chap. 4.
- 2.
Note, also, that students’ responses have not been edited in any way, such as to correct spelling, grammatical, or punctuation errors, and thus are reproduced here exactly as originally written by the students. I have also purposely avoided the use of [sic] within any of the responses in order to avoid inadvertently casting a negative light on any of the students. In most cases, students’ prescriptive errors do not inhibit their meaning, but when clarifications are needed, they are provided in brackets.
References
Cook, K., Lusk, A., Miller, L. C., Dodier, O. E., & Salazar, A. M. (2012). Understanding unearned privilege: An experiential activity for counseling students. Journal of Creativity in Mental Health, 7, 289–303.
Davies, W. (2016). The age of post-truth politics. The New York Times. Retrieved October 1, 2018, from https://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/24/opinion/campaign-stops/the-age-of-post-truth-politics.html.
Davis, N. (1992). Teaching about inequality: Student resistance, paralysis, and rage. Teaching Sociology, 20, 232–238.
Dweck, C. S. (2016). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York: Ballantine Books.
Godley, A. J., Reaser, J., & Moore, K. G. (2015). Pre-service English language arts teachers’ development of critical language awareness for teaching. Linguistics and Education, 32, 41–54.
Linguistic Society of America. (2018). 2019 five-minute linguist finalists announced. Retrieved October 1, 2018, from https://www.linguisticsociety.org/news/2018/09/24/2019-five-minute-linguist-finalists-announced.
Manglitz, E. (2003). Challenging White privilege in adult education: A critical review of the literature. Adult Education Quarterly, 53, 119–134.
Manjoo, F. (2008). True enough: Learning to live in a post-fact society. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
McBee Orzulak, M. J. (2015). Disinviting deficit ideologies: Beyond “that’s standard,” “that’s racist,” and “that’s your mother tongue”. Research in the Teaching of English, 50(2), 176–198.
McIntyre, L. (2018). Post-truth (MIT Press essential knowledge series). Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
Mindrup, R. M., Spray, B. J., & Lamberghini-West, A. (2011). White privilege and multicultural counseling competence: The influence of field of study, sex, and racial/ethnic exposure. Journal of Ethnic & Cultural Diversity in Social Work, 20, 20–38.
Parker, W. M., & Schwartz, R. C. (2002). On the experience of shame in multicultural counseling: Implications for White counselors-in-training. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 30, 311–318.
Pence, D. J., & Fields, J. A. (1999). Teaching about race and ethnicity: Trying to uncover White privilege for a White audience. Teaching Sociology, 27, 150–158.
Reaser, J. L. (2006). The effect of dialect awareness on adolescent knowledge and attitudes. Durham, NC: Duke University dissertation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hercula, S.E. (2020). Race, Gender, and the SISE Approach. In: Fostering Linguistic Equality. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41690-4_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41690-4_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-41689-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-41690-4
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)