Skip to main content

Race, Gender, and the SISE Approach

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Fostering Linguistic Equality
  • 321 Accesses

Abstract

Chapter 5 presents an analysis of the Structural Inquiry of Stigmatized Englishes (SISE) approach data centered on students’ race and gender, specifically, how their identity factors correlate with their likeliness to experience and acknowledge a shift in their language attitudes. The data show that, while the approach is overwhelmingly successful with female students and students of color, a significant percentage of White male students emerge as a group that shows resistance to the approach. Several case studies are analyzed to illustrate this trend, and the chapter concludes by proposing strategies for attempting to reach those in this group—and others who may be resistant to experiencing and acknowledging attitudinal shifts—both within and outside the classroom.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For further details regarding the students’ demographics and personal backgrounds, see Chap. 4.

  2. 2.

    Note, also, that students’ responses have not been edited in any way, such as to correct spelling, grammatical, or punctuation errors, and thus are reproduced here exactly as originally written by the students. I have also purposely avoided the use of [sic] within any of the responses in order to avoid inadvertently casting a negative light on any of the students. In most cases, students’ prescriptive errors do not inhibit their meaning, but when clarifications are needed, they are provided in brackets.

References

  • Cook, K., Lusk, A., Miller, L. C., Dodier, O. E., & Salazar, A. M. (2012). Understanding unearned privilege: An experiential activity for counseling students. Journal of Creativity in Mental Health, 7, 289–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, W. (2016). The age of post-truth politics. The New York Times. Retrieved October 1, 2018, from https://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/24/opinion/campaign-stops/the-age-of-post-truth-politics.html.

  • Davis, N. (1992). Teaching about inequality: Student resistance, paralysis, and rage. Teaching Sociology, 20, 232–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. S. (2016). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York: Ballantine Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godley, A. J., Reaser, J., & Moore, K. G. (2015). Pre-service English language arts teachers’ development of critical language awareness for teaching. Linguistics and Education, 32, 41–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linguistic Society of America. (2018). 2019 five-minute linguist finalists announced. Retrieved October 1, 2018, from https://www.linguisticsociety.org/news/2018/09/24/2019-five-minute-linguist-finalists-announced.

  • Manglitz, E. (2003). Challenging White privilege in adult education: A critical review of the literature. Adult Education Quarterly, 53, 119–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manjoo, F. (2008). True enough: Learning to live in a post-fact society. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • McBee Orzulak, M. J. (2015). Disinviting deficit ideologies: Beyond “that’s standard,” “that’s racist,” and “that’s your mother tongue”. Research in the Teaching of English, 50(2), 176–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre, L. (2018). Post-truth (MIT Press essential knowledge series). Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mindrup, R. M., Spray, B. J., & Lamberghini-West, A. (2011). White privilege and multicultural counseling competence: The influence of field of study, sex, and racial/ethnic exposure. Journal of Ethnic & Cultural Diversity in Social Work, 20, 20–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, W. M., & Schwartz, R. C. (2002). On the experience of shame in multicultural counseling: Implications for White counselors-in-training. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 30, 311–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pence, D. J., & Fields, J. A. (1999). Teaching about race and ethnicity: Trying to uncover White privilege for a White audience. Teaching Sociology, 27, 150–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reaser, J. L. (2006). The effect of dialect awareness on adolescent knowledge and attitudes. Durham, NC: Duke University dissertation.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah E. Hercula .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hercula, S.E. (2020). Race, Gender, and the SISE Approach. In: Fostering Linguistic Equality. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41690-4_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41690-4_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-41689-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-41690-4

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics