Skip to main content

The Design of the SISE Approach

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Fostering Linguistic Equality
  • 108 Accesses

Abstract

Chapter 3 delivers the details of enacting the Structural Inquiry of Stigmatized Englishes (SISE) approach, including a review of the curricular content and major activities and assignments. Also included is a brief introduction to the varieties that have been used as the central sources of linguistic data in the approach—African American English, Chicano English, and Appalachian English—and several illustrations of the types of linguistic analyses students conduct through the SISE approach, which highlight features of the varieties at different levels of analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In Chap. 4, I provide information regarding the specific courses and demographics of the students taught and present and analyze data collected to study the efficacy of the approach.

  2. 2.

    Sometimes I have shifted these topics within the sequence of the course for inclusion after the content I discuss in the next section (the global spread of English, translingualism, and intercultural communication), as it allows students to study this latter content sooner in the semester and thus gives them the ability to employ the practices they are studying within the conversation partners activity, which I discuss further below.

  3. 3.

    Descriptions of two of these assignments (the language and literacy narrative and the research paper) written for a student audience can be found in Appendix A.

References

  • Alim, H. S., & Smitherman, G. (2012). Articulate while Black: Barack Obama, language, and race in the U.S. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrientos, T. (2010). Se habla Español. In R. Bullock & M. D. Goggin (Eds.), The Norton field guide to writing (pp. 560–563). New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baugh, J. (2003). Linguistic profiling. In S. Makoni, G. Smitherman, A. F. Ball, & A. K. Spears (Eds.), Black linguistics: Language, society, and politics in Africa and the Americas (pp. 155–168). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, D. (2019). Language: A feminist guide. Retrieved November 22, 2019, from https://debuk.wordpress.com.

  • Canagarajah, S. (2012). Translingual practice: Global Englishes and cosmopolitan relations. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. D., & Hayward, N. M. (Eds.). (2013). Talking Appalachian: Voice, identity, and community. Lexington: University of Kentucky Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cran, W., & MacNeil, R. (2005). Do you speak American? Arlington, VA: Public Broadcasting Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fought, C. (2003). Chicano English in context. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • González, G. (1988). Chicano English. In D. J. Bixler-Marquez & J. Ornstein-Galicia (Eds.), Chicano speech in the bilingual classroom (pp. 71–81). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graddol, D. (2000). The future of English? A guide to forecasting the popularity of the English language in the 21st century. London: The British Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, L. (2002). African American English: A linguistic introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, K. D. (2007). When languages die: The extinction of the world’s languages and the erosion of human knowledge. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • International Dialects of English Archive. (2019). Retrieved November 22, 2019, from https://www.dialectsarchive.com.

  • Lippi-Green, R. (2012). English with an accent: Language, ideology, and discrimination in the United States (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, M. (2013). The historical background and nature of the Englishes of Appalachia. In A. D. Clark & N. M. Hayward (Eds.), Talking Appalachian: Voice, identity, and community (pp. 25–53). Lexington: University of Kentucky Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nero, S. (2005). Englishes in contact: Dialects, power and the burden of being understood. TESOL in Context, 15(1), 3–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandey, A. (2000). TOEFL to the test: Are monodialectal AAL-speakers similar to ESL students? World Englishes, 19(1), 89–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennycook, A. (2008). Translingual English. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 31(3), 30.1–30.9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rickford, J. R., & Rickford, R. J. (2000). Spoken soul: The story of Black English. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seargeant, P., & Tagg, C. (2011). English on the internet and a ‘post-varieties’ approach to language. World Englishes, 30(4), 496–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen, F. (1989). The classroom and the wider culture: Identity as a key to learning English composition. College Composition and Communication, 40(4), 459–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva, T., Reichelt, M., Chikuma, Y., Duval-Couetil, N., Mo, R.-P. J., Vélez-Rendón, G., et al. (2003). Second language writing up close and personal: Some success stories. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Exploring the dynamics of second language writing (pp. 93–114). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E. (2002). Ebonics: A case history. In L. Delpit & J. K. Dowdy (Eds.), The skin that we speak: Thoughts on language and culture in the classroom (pp. 15–27). New York: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smitherman, G. (2000). Talkin that talk: Language, culture and education in African America. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, A. (2010). Mother tongue. In R. Bullock & M. D. Goggin (Eds.), The Norton field guide to writing (pp. 564–570). New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villanueva Jr., V. (1993). Bootstraps: From an American academic of color. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfram, W., Adger, C. T., & Christian, D. (1999). Dialects in schools and communities. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfram, W., & Christian, D. (1976). Appalachian speech. Arlington: Center for Applied Linguistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yule, G. (2017). The study of language (6th ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah E. Hercula .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hercula, S.E. (2020). The Design of the SISE Approach. In: Fostering Linguistic Equality. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41690-4_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41690-4_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-41689-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-41690-4

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics