Abstract
The main aim of the article is to compare the Baltic countries with Denmark in accordance with the different macro-economic indicators and the identification the potential growth of the innovation level. The subject of the article is the potential level of innovation by the different macro-economic indicators in the Baltic countries and Denmark. The article analyses the innovation’s value and the macro-economic indicators, which may depend the state’s level of innovation. The main methods are a logical, systematic, statistical analysis. The investigation has shown that not all macroeconomic indicator Denmark is a leader in innovation. According to some macro-economic indicator the Baltic countries would be innovation leaders. This shows that the Baltic countries have the potential to increase the level of innovation. European Innovation Scoreboard for European Union Countries calculates the summary innovation index. There are four main groups: innovation leaders, strong innovators, moderate innovators and modest innovators. Baltic countries are the moderate innovators; Denmark is the innovation leader. Latvia took a 31st place, Lithuania 30th, Estonia 19th, Denmark 3rd. The higher level has Sweden and Switzerland. There are several different reasons why are the different levels of innovation in the country, even though the countries are similar in size and in a geographical area.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Archibugi, D., & Filippetti, A. (2011). Is the economic crisis impairing convergence in innovation performance across Europe? Journal of Common Market Studies, 49(6), 1153–1182.
Bushehri, F. (2012). Green economy in the Arab region. Regional DTIE Officer, United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP), Regional Office West Asia (ROWA), pp. 1–12.
European Commission. (2016). Summary innovation index. [online] Accessed December 10, 2017, from https://ec.europa.eu/growth/industry/innovation/facts-figures/scoreboards_en16
Eurostat. (2017a). Investment rate of non-financial, 2016. Macroeconomic indicators, 2016. [online] Accessed December 10, 2017, from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database/investment/rate/of/non/financial
Eurostat. (2017b). Net return on equity, after taxes, of non-financial corporations, 2016. Macroeconomic indicators. [online] Accessed December 10, 2017, from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database/net/return/on/equity
Eurostat. (2017c). Real GDP growth rate, 2016. Macroeconomic indicators. [online] Accessed December 10, 2017, from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database/GDP/growth/rate
Eurostat. (2017d). Real labor productivity per hour worked, 2016. Macroeconomic indicators. [online] Accessed December 10, 2017, from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database/real/laborproductivity
Eurostat. (2017e). Trade balance, 2016. Macroeconomic indicators. [online] Accessed December 10, 2017, from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database/trade/balance
Fagerberg, J., Laestadius, S., & Martin, R. B. (2015). The triple challenge for Europe. Economic Development, Climate Change and Governance, 5(2), 10–15.
Grupp, H., & Schubert, T. (2010). Review and new evidence on composite innovation indicators for evaluating national performance. Journal of Research Policy, 39(1), 67–78.
Korres, G., & Drakopoulos, S. (2009). Economics of innovation: A review in theory and models. European Research Studies, 7(3), 20–35.
Krugman, P. (2010). Building a green economy. The New York Times, 1–15.
Morris, L. (2013). Three dimensions of innovation. International Management Review, 9(2), 5–10.
Schiederig, T., Tietze, F., & Herstatt, C. (2012). Green innovation in technology and innovation management – An exploratory literature review. R&D Management, 42(2), 80–85.
Szabo, Z. K., Soltés, M., & Herman, E. (2013). Innovative capacity & performance of transition economies: Comparative study at the level of enterprises. Economic and Management, 16(1), 52–68.
Veugeler, R. (2016). The European Union’s growing innovation divide. [online] Accessed December 10, 2017, from http://bruegel.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/pc_2016_08.pdf
Zamora-Torres, A., De San Nicolas, D. H., & Universidad, M. (2014). Competitiveness of countries on innovation and technology. Global Journal of Business, 8(5), 73–83.
Acknowledgement
This research was funded by a grant (No. 09.3.3.-LMT-K-712-06-0245) from the Research Council of Lithuania.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Benetyte, R., Krusinskas, R. (2019). Innovations Risk Factors Analysis Between Innovation Leaders and Moderate Innovators. In: Bilgin, M., Danis, H., Demir, E., Can, U. (eds) Eurasian Business Perspectives. Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics, vol 11/2. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18652-4_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18652-4_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-18651-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-18652-4
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)