Advertisement

Constrained \(H_{\infty }\) Control for Active Suspensions

  • Weichao SunEmail author
  • Huijun Gao
  • Peng Shi
Chapter
Part of the Studies in Systems, Decision and Control book series (SSDC, volume 204)

Abstract

In this chapter, the quarter-car model is mainly adopted to develop \(H_{\infty }\) optimal control method. On account of its good disturbance attenuation performances and strong robustness, \(H_{\infty }\) control scheme is relatively efficient to be utilized in active suspensions. In Sect. 2.1, a traditional \(H_{\infty }\) control method in the entire frequency domain is elaborated. The minimum \(H_{\infty }\) norm from the disturbance of the closed-loop system to the vehicle body acceleration is searched for by convex optimal method in order to get the controller gain with the best disturbance attenuation ability and satisfy corresponding performance constraints. In Sect. 2.2, a load-dependent controller design approach is presented to solve the problem of multi-objective control for vehicle active suspension systems. It is assumed that the vehicle body mass whose value changes with the vehicle load resides in an interval and can be measured online.

References

  1. 1.
    H. Chen, K.H. Guo, Constrained \(H_{\infty }\) control of active suspensions: an LMI approach. IEEE Trans. Control. Syst. Technol. 13(3), 412–421 (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    S. Boyd, L.E. Ghaoui, E. Feron, V. Balakishnan, Linear Matrix Inequalities in System and Control Theory (SIAM, Philadelphia, PA, 1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    D. Hrovat, Survey of advanced suspension developments and related optimal control applications. Automatica 33(10), 1781–1817 (1997)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    H. Chen, P.Y. Sun, K.H. Guo, A multi-objective control design for active suspensions with hard constraints. In: Proceedings of the American Control Conference (2003), pp. 14371–4376Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    H. Gao, C. Wang, Robust energy-to-peak filtering with improved LMI representations. IEE Proc. Vis. Image Signal Process. 150, 82–89 (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    H. Gao, C. Wang, A delay-dependent approach to robust HN and L2CLN filtering for a class of uncertain nonlinear time-delayed systems. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control. 48(9), 1661–1666 (2003)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    M.A. Rotea, The generalized \({H_2}\) control problem. Automatica 29, 73C385 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. Chilali, P. Gahinet, \(H_{\infty }\) design with pole placement constraints: an LMI approach. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control. 41(3), 358–367 (1996)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    T.J. Gordon, C. Marsh, M.G. Milsted, A comparison of adaptive LQG and nonlinear controllers for vehicle suspension systems. Veh. Syst. Dyn. 20(6), 321–340 (1991)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    P. Gahinet, A. Nemirovskii, A.J. Laub, M. Chilali, LMI Control Toolbox Users Guide (The Math. Works Inc., Natick, MA, 1995)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    M.M. El Madany, M.I. Al-Majed, Quadratic synthesis of active controls for a quarter-car model. J. Vib. Control. 7(8), 1237–1252 (2001)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of AstronauticsHarbin Institute of TechnologyHarbinChina
  2. 2.School of Electrical and Electronic EngineeringUniversity of AdelaideAdelaideAustralia

Personalised recommendations