Abstract
Educators are socialized into ‘commonsense’ ways of seeing the world that support rational, humanistic, anthropocentric thinking. The U.S. schooling system further reinforces these perspectives by defining education in quantitative terms, turning teachers, students, and learning processes into numerical data points. These perspectives tend to shape educational leaders’ understandings of leadership and research. As they enter professional doctorate, or three year Ed.D. programmes, many educational leaders bring with them entrenched views of objectivity and linearity, as well as a view of leadership as enacted by individual human actors. This chapter discusses ways to disrupt commonsense thinking reinforcing individualistic, representational, and human-centered worldviews by drawing on pedagogies informed by posthuman thinkers (including Braidotti 2013; Code 2006; Deleuze and Guattari 1987; Plumwood 2002) to reframe practice and educational research in more affirmative, connected, multiplistic terms that emphasise productive difference and relations with the more-than-human world. Both authors teach courses in three-year professional doctorate programmes in educational leadership, and provide examples of instruction that put to work these ideas in our classes. The chapter concludes with suggestions and connections for (re)imagining how such pedagogical projects may be useful to other educators in higher education settings.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Amster, R., DeLeon, A., Fernandez, L., Nocella, A. J., II, & Shannon, D. (Eds.). (2009). Contemporary anarchist studies: An introductory anthology of anarchy in the academy. New York, NY: Routledge.
Bennett, J. (2009). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Durham: Duke University Press.
Best, S. (2009). The rise of critical animal studies: Putting theory into action and animal liberation into higher education. Journal for Critical Animal Studies,7(1), 9–52.
Bradshaw, G. A., Schore, A. N., Brown, J. L., Poole, J. H., & Moss, C. J. (2005). Elephant breakdown: Social trauma: Early disruption of attachment can affect the physiology, behaviour and culture of animals and humans over generations. Nature,433, 807.
Braidotti, R. (1994). Nomadic subjects: Embodiment and sexual difference in contemporary feminist theory. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Braidotti, R. (2011). Nomadic theory: The portable Rosi Braidotti. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
Braidotti, R. (2017, August). The posthuman condition. Presentation at the University of Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Braidotti, R. (2018). Affirmative ethics, posthuman subjectivity, and intimate scholarship: A conversation with Rosi Braidotti. In K. Strom, T. Mills, & A. Ovens (Eds.), Decentering the researcher in intimate scholarship: Critical posthuman methodological perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer.
Code, L. (2006). Ecological thinking: The politics of epistemic location. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Foucault, M. (2010). What is enlightenment? (C. Porter, Trans.). In P. Rabinow (Ed.), The Foucault reader (pp. 32–50). New York, NY: Vintage Books.
Haraway, D. J. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies,14(3), 575–599.
Haraway, D. J. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Kenward, B., Rutz, C., Weir, A., & Kacelnik, A. (2006). Development of tool use in new Caledonian crows: Inherited action patterns and social influence. Animal Behaviour,72, 1329–1343.
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Lupinacci, J., & Happel-Parkins, A. (2015). Recognize, resist, and reconstitute: An ecocritical framework in teacher education. The SoJo Journal: Educational Foundations and Social Justice Education,1(1), 45–61.
Lupinacci, J., & Happel-Parkins, A. (2017). Ecocritically (re)considering STEM: Integrated ecological inquiry in teacher education. Issues in Teacher Education,26(3), 52–64.
Lupinacci J., & Lupinacci Ward, M. (2017). (Re)imaginings of “community”: Perceptions of (dis)ability, the environment, and inclusion. In A. J. Nocella II, A. George, J. L. Schatz, & S. Taylor (Eds.), Weaving nature, animals and disability for social justice: From theory to experience in eco-ability (pp. 63–78). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
Nocella, A. J., II, White, R. J., & Cudworth, E. (2015). Anarchism and animal liberation: Essays on complementary elements of total liberation. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.
Plumwood, V. (1993). Feminism and the mastery of nature. London, UK: Routledge.
Plumwood, V. (2002). Environmental culture: The ecological crisis of reason. New York, NY: Routledge.
Quinn, D. (1995). Ishmael. New York, NY: Bantam.
Rich, A. (1984). Notes towards a politics of location. In R. Lewis & S. Mills (Eds.), Feminist postcolonial theory: A reader (pp. 29–42). New York, NY: Routledge.
Strom, K. J. (2018). “That’s not very Deleuzian”: Thoughts on interrupting the exclusionary nature of “high theory”. Educational Philosophy and Theory,50(1), 104–113.
Strom, K. J., & Martin, A. D. (2013). Putting philosophy to work in the classroom: Using rhizomatics to deterritorialize neoliberal thought and practice. Studying Teacher Education,9(3), 219–235.
Strom, K. J., & Martin, A. D. (2017). Thinking with theory in an era of trump. Issues in Teacher Education,26(3), 3–22.
Taylor, C. (2016). Edu-crafting a cacophonous ecology: Posthumanist research practices for education. In C. Taylor & C. Hughes (Eds.), Posthuman research practices in education (pp. 5–14). London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Twine, R. (2010). Animals as biotechnology: Ethics, sustainability and critical animal studies. New York, NY: Routledge.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Warren, K. (1990). The power and the promise of ecological feminism. Environmental Ethics,12(2), 125–146.
Warren, K. (2000). Ecofeminist philosophy: A Western perspective on what it is and why it matters. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
World Wildlife Fund for Nature (WWF). (2017). Threats to African elephants. WWF Global. Retrieved from http://wwf.panda.org/knowledge_hub/endangered_species/elephants/african_elephants/afelephants_threats/.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Strom, K.J., Lupinacci, J. (2019). Putting Posthuman Theories to Work in Educational Leadership Programmes. In: Taylor, C.A., Bayley, A. (eds) Posthumanism and Higher Education. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14672-6_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14672-6_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-14671-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-14672-6
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)