Abstract
Pedagogic posthuman assemblages are a generative means for exploring entanglements of affect that circulate through humans and non-humans. In this chapter, we include a poetic account of our posthuman pedagogic research practice that leverages our work as feminist scholars in the academy. Through the curation of an uneasy assemblage (Bone and Blaise in Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 16: 18–31, 2015), and its presentation as an affective choreography, we juxtapose the personal and political, the biographical, the technological and the sociological. The uneasy assemblage, comprising images, media articles and reported responses to scandals from the public, deterritorialises qualitative research practice, and allows for an interrogation of how affect mobilises in the form of gendered violence. This research work, generated through a feminist process of slow musings (Taylor in Cultural Studies-Critical Methodologies, 16: 201–212, 2016), underpinned a conference presentation that was conceptualised as an affective choreography. In taking up an imaginative posthuman approach, we rethink our embodiment in assemblages and entanglements across a range of spaces: higher education spaces; pedagogic spaces at conferences; cyber spaces; and schooling spaces. This pedagogic practice in higher education embraces vital materialism.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ahmed, S. (2010). Feminist killjoys (and other wilful subjects). http://sfonline.barnard.edu/polyphonic/print_ahmed.htm. Accessed 10 December 2016.
Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Bissell, D. (2009). Obdurate pains, transient intensities: Affect and the chronically pained body. Environment and Planning A,4(41), 911–928.
Black, A., Crimmins, G., & Henderson, L. (2017). Reducing the drag: Creating V formations through slow scholarship and story. In S. Riddle, M. K. Harmes, & P. A. Danaher (Eds.), Producing pleasure in the contemporary university. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Bolt, B. (2013). Introduction: Toward a ‘new materialism’ through the arts. In E. Barrett & B. Bolt (Eds.), Carnal knowledge: Towards a ‘new materialism’ through the arts. London: I.B. Tauris.
Bone, B., & Blaise, M. (2015). An uneasy assemblage: Prisoners, animals, asylum-seeking children and posthuman packaging. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood,16(1), 18–31.
Boyd, D. (2014). It’s complicated: The social lives of networked teens. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Braidotti, R. (2016). Posthuman critical theory. In D. Banerji & M. Paranjape (Eds.), Critical posthumanism and planetary futures. New Delhi: Springer.
Charteris, J., Gannon, S., Mayes, E., Nye, A., & Stephenson, L. (2016). The emotional knots of academicity: A collective biography of academic subjectivities and spaces. Higher Education Research & Development,35(1), 31–44.
Charteris, J., Nye, A., & Jones, M. (2018). Feasible Utopias and affective flows in the academy: A mobilisation of hope and optimism. In A. L. Black & S. Garvis (Eds.), Women activating agency in academia: Metaphors, manifestos and memoir. London: Routledge.
Clough, P. (2008). The affective turn: Political economy, biomedia and bodies. Theory, Culture & Society,5, 1–22.
Colebrook, C. (2010). Introduction. In A. Parr (Ed.), The Deleuze dictionary. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Davies, B., & Gannon, S. (2006). Doing collective biography: Investigating the production of subjectivity. New York, NY: Open University Press.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Deleuze, G., & Parnet, C. (2007). Dialogues II (H. Tomlinson & B. Habberjam, Trans.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Dovey, K. (2010). Becoming places: Urbanism/architecture/identity/power. New York, NY: Routledge.
Easteal, P., Holland, K., & Judd, K. (2015). Enduring themes and silences in media portrayals of violence against women. Women’s Studies International Forum,48, 103–113.
Ford, C. (2016, August 18) The epidemic of rape culture in schools can no longer be ignored. Sydney Morning Herald. http://www.smh.com.au/lifestyle/news-and-views/opinion/the-epidemic-of-rape-culture-in-schools-can-no-longer-be-ignored-20160817-gquv53.html. Accessed 18 August 2016.
Gale, K. (2016). Theorizing as practice: Engaging the posthuman as method of inquiry and pedagogic practice within contemporary higher education. In C. A. Taylor & C. Hughes (Eds.), Posthuman research practices in education. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Haraway, D. (2016). Staying with the trouble. London: Duke University Press.
Hemmings, C. (2005). Invoking affect: Cultural theory and the ontological turn. Cultural Studies,19(5), 548–567.
Honan, E., Henderson, L., & Loch, S. (2015). Producing moments of pleasure within the confines of an academic quantified self. Creative Approaches to Research, 8(3), 44–62.
Ingold, T. (2011). Being alive: Essays on movement, knowledge and description. New York, NY: Routledge.
MacLure, M. (2013). Researching without representation? Language and materiality in post-qualitative methodology. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education,26(6), 658–667.
Manning, E. (2013). Always more than one: Individuation’s dance. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Massumi, B. (1995). The autonomy of affect. Cultural Critique,31, 83–109.
Mayes, E. (2017). Reconceptualizing the presence of students on school governance councils: The a/effects of spatial positioning. Policy Futures in Education, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210317739468.
McKnight, L. (2016). The deep end: Pedagogy, poetry and the public pool. www.publicpedagogies.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/McKnightL.pdf. Accessed 8 May 2018.
Mulcahy, D. (2012). Affective assemblages: Body matters in the pedagogic practices of contemporary school classrooms. Pedagogy, Culture & Society,20(1), 9–27.
Peters, M. A., & Besley, T. (2018). Weinstein, sexual predation, and ‘rape culture’: Public pedagogies and hashtag internet activism. Education Philosophy and Theory, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2018.1427850.
Phipps, A., Ringrose, J., Renold, E., & Jackson, C. (2017). Rape culture, lad culture and everyday sexism: Researching, conceptualizing and politicizing new mediations of gender and sexual violence. Journal of Gender Studies, 1–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2016.1266792.
Probyn, E. (2004). Teaching bodies: Affects in the classroom. Body & Society,10(4), 21–43.
Shaviro, S. (2010). Post-cinematic affect. Washington, DC: Zero Books.
Springgay, S. (2014). Approximate-rigorous-abstractions: Propositions for posthumanist activation in educational research. In N. Snaza & J. A. Weaver (Eds.), Posthumanism and educational research. New York, NY: Routledge.
St. Pierre, E. (2016a). Deleuze and Guattari’s language for new empirical inquiry. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 49(11), 1080–1089.
St. Pierre, E. (2016b). Rethinking the empirical in the Posthuman. In C. Taylor & C. Hughes (Eds.), Posthuman research practices in education. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Taylor, C. A. (2016). Close encounters of a critical kind: A diffractive musing in/between new material feminism and object-oriented ontology. Cultural Studies-Critical Methodologies,16(2), 201–212.
Taylor, A., & Pacini-Ketchabaw, V. (2015). Learning with children, ants, and worms in the anthropocene: Towards a common world pedagogy of multispecies vulnerability. Pedagogy, Culture & Society,23(4), 507–529.
Thrift, N. (2004). Intensities of feeling: Towards a spatial politics of affect. Special Issue: The political challenge of relational space. Geografiska Annaler. Series B, Human Geography, 86(1), 57–78.
Thrift, N. (2008). Non-representational theory: Space, politics, affect. London: Routledge.
Tilly, C., & Hoad, N. (2017). Interactive digital storytelling team. Australian Broadcasting Commission (ABC). http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-10-11/ssm-same-sex-marriage-respectful-debate-ugly-side/8996500. Accessed 26 October 2017.
Tran, M. (2006, October 26). Australian Muslim leader compares women to uncovered meat. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2006/oct/26/australia.marktran. Accessed 20 September 2017.
Tuck, E., & Yang, K. (2014). Unbecoming claims: Pedagogies of refusal in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry,20(6), 811–818.
University of New South Wales Gendered Violence Research Network. (2017). Gendered violence & work. What is gendered violence. https://www.arts.unsw.edu.au/research/gendered-violence-research-network/gendered-violence-work/. Accessed 10 September 2017.
Wolf, M. (2017). Affective schoolgirl assemblages making school spaces of non/belonging: Emotion. Space and Society,25, 63–70.
Youdell, D., & Armstrong, F. (2011). A politics beyond subjects: The affective choreographies and smooth spaces of schooling. Emotion, Space and Society,4(3), 144–150.
Zillman, C. (2017, October 16). ‘Me too’: How Alyssa Milano’s two-word protest against sexual harassment went viral. Fortune. http://fortune.com/2017/10/16/me-too-facebook-alyssa-milano/. Accessed 18 October 2017.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Charteris, J., Nye, A. (2019). Posthuman Methodology and Pedagogy: Uneasy Assemblages and Affective Choreographies. In: Taylor, C.A., Bayley, A. (eds) Posthumanism and Higher Education. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14672-6_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14672-6_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-14671-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-14672-6
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)