Skip to main content

Disruptive Pedagogies for Teacher Education: The Power of Potentia in Posthuman Times

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Posthumanism and Higher Education

Abstract

This chapter recounts the experience of tutors and students at a further education college in the north of England, who, over the course of an academic year, viewed their teacher training curriculum through a posthuman lens in order to reimagine the world of teaching and learning for the twenty-first century and beyond. Becoming a teacher in England today is challenging, as educators at all levels suffer the fall-out of far-reaching funding cuts, increased managerialism, and a shifting educational paradigm that privileges instrumental approaches to teaching. Concepts of posthumanism and their practical application in a teacher training environment are explored, drawing on the thinking of Barad, Braidotti, Deleuze and Guattari and Haraway amongst others. The chapter describes how students and tutors put these concepts to work in order to reimagine their teaching journeys, through art, poetry, ‘disruptive’ pedagogies and rhizomatic emergences, taking cross-disciplinary approaches to traditional academic teacher education pathways. The ethical and practical challenges of taking a ‘posthuman turn’ when training new educators are considered. In a spirit of affirmation, recommendations are then made that draw on ‘potentia’ as a form of power that can move trainee teachers from a place of pain to one of action and transformation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahmed, S. (2017). Living a feminist life. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barad, K. (2009). Matter feels, converses, suffers, desires, yearns and remembers. In R. Dolphijn & I. van der Tuin, New Materialism: Interviews & Cartographies. Michigan: Open Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. London: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Braidotti, R. (2008). Affirmation, pain and empowerment. Asian Journal of Women’s Studies,14(3), 7–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braidotti, R. (2012). Nomadic theory: The portable Rosi Braidotti. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braidotti, R. (2016). Posthuman critical theory. In Critical posthumanism and planetary futures (pp. 13–32). London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braidotti, R. (2017). Posthuman, all too human: The memoirs and aspirations of a posthumanist (The Tanner Lectures), Yale University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clover, D., & Stalker, J. (Eds.). (2007). The arts and social justice. Leicester: NIACE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coffield, F., & Williamson, B. (2011). From exam factories to communities of discovery. London: Institute of Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colman, F. (2018). Feminicity. In R. Braidotti & M. Hlavajova (Eds.), Posthuman glossary. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cormier, D. (2008). Rhizomatic education: Community as curriculum.http://davecormier.com/edblog/2008/06/03/rhizomatic-education-community-as-curriculum/. Accessed 14 December 2017.

  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrando, F. (2012). Towards a posthumanist methodology. A statement. Frame: Journal of Literary Studies. Special Issue on Narrating Posthumanism, 25(1), 9–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forstenzer, J. (2016). The teaching excellence framework: What’s the purpose? The Sir Bernard Crick Centre. http://www.crickcentre.org/teaching-excellence-framework/. Accessed 25 October 2017.

  • Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (2006). A cyborg manifesto: Science, technology, and socialist-feminism in the late 20th century. In J. Weiss, J. Nolan, J. Hunsinger, & P. Trifonas (Eds.), The international handbook of virtual learning environments. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (2008). When species meet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hlavajova, M. (2015, August 26). Critique-as-proposition: Thinking about, with, and through art in our time. University of Utrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jagodzinksi, J. (2018). From the artist to the cosmic artisan: The educational task for art in anthropogenic times. In C. Naughton, G. Biesta, & D. Cole (Eds.), Art, artists and pedagogy: Philosophy and the arts in education. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. New York: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Münch, R. (2014). Academic capitalism: Universities in the global struggle for excellence. London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mycroft, L., & Sidebottom, K. (2018). Constellations of practice. In P. Bennett & R. Smith (Eds.), Identity and resistance in further education. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mycroft, L., & Weatherby, J. (2015). Spaces to dance: Community education. In M. Daley, K. Orr, & J. Petrie (Eds.), Further education and the twelve dancing princesses. London: Trentham Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordstrom, S., Nordstrom, A., & Nordstrom, C. (2018). Guilty of loving you: A multispecies narrative. Qualitative Inquiry, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • NUS Black Students. (2015). Why is my curriculum white? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dscx4h2l-Pk. Accessed 14 January 2018.

  • Palmer, P. J. (1998). The courage to teach: Exploring the inner landscape of a teacher’s life. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randle, K., & Brady, N. (1997). Managerialism and professionalism in the ‘cinderella service’. Journal of Vocational Education & Training,49(1), 121–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reay, D. (2012). What would a socially just education system look like?: Saving the minnows from the pike. Journal of Education Policy,27(5), 587–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seeking Lost Women. (2015). Lost women educators. http://seekinglostwomen.blogspot.co.uk/. Accessed 21 January 2018.

  • Sidebottom, K. (2017). Teaching form 2: Alternative notes from a teaching observation. Belonging: Transformative Education in Challenging Times. https://teachdifferent2017.wordpress.com/magazine/. Accessed 28 August 2018.

  • Society for the Advancement of Philosophical Enquiry and Reflection in Education. (n.d.). Community philosophy. http://www.sapere.org.uk/Members,Schools,Partners/CommunityPhilosophy.aspx. Accessed 21 January 2018.

  • Strom, K. (2017). “That’s not very Deleuzian”: Thoughts on interrupting the exclusionary nature of “high theory”. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 50(1), 104–113. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00131857.2017.1339340?journalCode=rept20. Accessed 12 January 2018.

  • Suissa, J. (2014). Towards an anarchist philosophy of education. New perspectives in philosophy of education (pp. 139–159). London: Bloomsbury Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. A. (2016). Edu-crafting a cacophonous ecology: Posthuman research practice for education. In C. A. Taylor & C. Hughes (Eds.), Posthuman research practices in education. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • University of Huddersfield. (2016). In-service certificate in education (lifelong learning) module handbook. Huddersfield, UK: Author.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sidebottom, K. (2019). Disruptive Pedagogies for Teacher Education: The Power of Potentia in Posthuman Times. In: Taylor, C.A., Bayley, A. (eds) Posthumanism and Higher Education. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14672-6_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14672-6_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-14671-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-14672-6

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics