Skip to main content

The Myth of Urban Self Sufficiency

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
America’s Most Sustainable Cities and Regions

Abstract

Beginning in the mid nineteenth century, the U.S. economy transitioned from a largely rural society, still based predominantly on agriculture and renewable resources, to an urban society dependent to an increasing extent on non-renewable resources and cheap fossil energy, and a globalized industrial agricultural and manufacturing system. The shift from a society based on renewable natural resource flows to non-renewable resource stocks is one of the most important and unprecedented transitions in the history of mankind. This shift allowed for massive human population growth, unprecedented exploitation of the earth’s resources, increasing per capita wealth for many, and the dramatic growth of urban areas. Renewable resources are those that can be replaced in a relatively short amount of time such as agricultural crops, trees, and fish. Non-renewable resource stocks are those such as fossil fuels and mineral ores that are not replaced on a meaningful time scale and are forever depleted until they have been practically exhausted. This means that there comes a time when a resource, such as hydrocarbon fuel, is no longer economical to exploit, which occurs long before complete exhaustion. Much of this book is about what happens in different regions when these stocks are depleted and we are forced to depend, once again, on poorer-quality resource stocks as well as daily flows of energy from the sun. Environmentalists and the news media, most of who live and work in urban areas, often speak longingly about a future based on renewable energy. Watch out what you ask for.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Joseph Tainter and Tadeusz Patzek. 2012. Drilling Down – The Gulf Oil Debacle and Our Energy Dilemma. Springer, New York. 242 p.

  2. 2.

    Vitousek PM, Mooney HA, Lubchenco J, Melillo JM. 1997. Human domination of earth’s ecosystems. Science, 277, 494–499.; Smil, V. 2013. Harvesting the Biosphere: How Much We Have Taken from Nature. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 312 pp. This is discussed in more detail in Chap. 5.

  3. 3.

    e.g., Better, Smarter Cities. We have seen a brighter future, and it is Urban. Scientific American Special Issue, September 2011.; Robert Kunzig. 2011. The City Solution; Why cities are the best cure for our planet’s growing pains. National Geographic, December.

  4. 4.

    David Owen, Green Manhattan. The New Yorker, October 18 2004.

  5. 5.

    http://autos.yahoo.com/photos/the-10-u-s-cities-with-the-worst-traffic.

  6. 6.

    Elizabeth Farrelly. 2008 Blubberland: The Dangers of Happyness. The MIT Press, Cambridge MA. 218.

  7. 7.

    Edward Glaeser. 2011. The Triumph of the City. Penguin Books, London, 338 p.

  8. 8.

    Scientific American 2011, ibid.

  9. 9.

    U.S. Energy Information Agency. State-Level Energy-Related Carbon Dioxide Emissions, 2000–2011. U.S. Department of Energy, Washington. August 2014. 16 p. http://www.eia.gov/environment/emissions/state/analysis/

  10. 10.

    Christopher Jones and Daniel Kammen. 2011. Quantifying carbon footprint reduction opportunities for U.S. households and communities. Environmental Science and Technology, 45, 4088–4095. Jones and Kammen. 2013. Spatial distribution of U.S. household carbon footprints reveals suburbanization undermines greenhouse gas benefits of urban population density. Environmental Science & Technology. doi:org/10.1021/es4034364.

  11. 11.

    Rees, W. E. 2012. Cities as dissipative structures: Global change and the vulnerability of urban civilization. In: Sustainability Science, pp. 247–273. Springer New York.

  12. 12.

    Burger, J. R., et al. 2012. The macroecology of sustainability. PLoS Biol, 10(6), e1001345.

  13. 13.

    Decker, E., et al. 2000. Energy and material flow through the urban ecosystem. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 25, 685–740.

  14. 14.

    Brown L. 2002. New York: Garbage capital of the world. Earth Policy Institute. http://www.earth-policy.org/plan_b_updates/2002/update10.

  15. 15.

    Smil, V. 2011. Harvesting the biosphere: the human impact. Population and Development Review, 613–636.

  16. 16.

    Howard T. Odum. 2007. Environment, power, and society for the twenty-first century: the hierarchy of energy. Columbia University Press.

  17. 17.

    Webb, N.R. 1998. The traditional management of European heathlands. Journal of Applied Ecology</Emphasis>, 35, 987–990.

  18. 18.

    Weisz, H., & Steinberger, J. K. 2010. Reducing energy and materials flows in cities. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2, 185–192.

  19. 19.

    Heinonen, J., & Junnila, S. 2011. Implications of urban structure on carbon consumption in metropolitan areas. Environmental Research Letters, 6(1), 014018.

  20. 20.

    http://www.thelmagazine.com/2008/03/new-york-class-index/.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Day, J.W., Hall, C. (2016). The Myth of Urban Self Sufficiency. In: America’s Most Sustainable Cities and Regions. Copernicus, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3243-6_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics