Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Fallopian Tube Dysfunction in Unexplained Infertility

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Unexplained Infertility

Abstract

Unexplained infertility is a “waste basket” diagnosis, encompassing about half of couples experiencing infertility. That infertility is unexplained in at least 50 % of our patients should serve as evidence that we have failed to dissect out the different etiologies comprising this heterogeneous group, while at the same time advancing assisted reproductive technologies. So, while 50 % or more of infertile couples remain undiagnosed, the great majority of them will conceive. And the question, given this reality, is: how much does an accurate diagnosis matter if we can help such couples achieve a successful pregnancy?

Does the fallopian tube matter anymore?

Frank tubal obstruction, either proximal or distal, has great relevance to the treatment of the infertile patient. Tubal obstruction is still centrally placed in practically every diagnostic algorithm, directing treatment to surgical correction of the abnormality or nonsurgical approaches bypassing the obstruction like in vitro fertilization (IVF). As IVF has become the mainstay of fertility treatment, that paradigm has shifted to performing IVF-first versus IVF as pathway last resort.

Can a tube be patent yet nonfunctional? Clearly, in the presence of normal sperm and ovulatory cycles, this tiny, 12-cm-long structure, with its elaborate ciliary lining and sophisticated propulsive mechanism allowing bidirectional traffic of sperm, eggs, and embryos, has the potential for a myriad of aberrations. Hence, tubal dysfunction without mechanical obstruction may be responsible for a significant proportion of unexplained infertility.

Currently, we use hysterosalpingography or laparoscopic tubal lavage to diagnose tubal patency. However, the presence of a diseased tube is frequently diagnosed only in retrospect with an ectopic pregnancy. Since nonsurgical treatment is now quite common, most cases of ectopic pregnancy will have a presumed diagnosis of chronic salpingitis without histologic evidence.

The exponential rise of IVF as the most successful fertility treatment has markedly diminished the interest in the study of tubal physiology. In this chapter, we would like to revisit the subject. In reexamining tubal pathologies other than mechanical obstruction, we will attempt to outline the various causes of endotubal disease in patients with unexplained infertility and patent tubes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Eddy CA, Pauerstein CJ. Anatomy and physiology of the fallopian tube. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1980;23(4):1177–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Brosens IA, Vasquez G. Fimbrial microbiopsy. J Reprod Med. 1976;16:171.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Speroff L, Fritz MA. Female infertility. In: Speroff L, Fritz MA, editors. Clinical gynaecologic endocrinology and infertility. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005. pp. 1046–55.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Camus E, Poncelet C, Goffinet F, Wainer B, Meriet F, Nisand I, et al. Pregnancy rates after in-vitro fertilization in cases of tubal infertility with and without hydrosalpinx: a meta-analysis of published comparative studies. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:1243–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Salpingectomy for hydrosalpinx prior to in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2008;90:S66–8.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Johnson N, et al. Surgical treatment for tubal disease in women due to undergo in vitro fertilisation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(1):CD002125.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Copperman A, Wells V, Luna M, Kalir T, Sandler B, Mukherjee T. Presence of hydrosalpinx correlated to endometrial inflammatory response in vivo. Fertil Steril. 2006;86(4):972–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tay JJ, Rutherford AJ, Killick SR, Maguiness SD, Patridge RJ, Leese HJ. Human tubal fluid: production, nutrient composition, and response to adrenergic agents. Hum Reprod. 1997;12(11):2451–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nichol R, Hunter RHF, Garner DK, Leese HJ, Cooke GM. Concentrations of energy substrates in oviductal fluid and blood plasma during the peri-ovulatory period. J Reprod Fertil. 1992;96:699–707.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tay JJ, Rutherford AJ, Killick SR, maguiness SD, Patridge RJ, Leese HJ. Human tubal fluid: production, nutrient composition, and response to adrenergic agents. Hum Reprod. 1997;12(11):2451–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mcdonald MF, Bellve AR. Influence of oestrogen and progesterone on flow of fluid from the fallopian tube in the ovariectomized ewe. J Reprod Fertil. 1969;20:51–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mastroianna L, Beer F, Shah V, Clewe TH. Endocrine regulation of oviduct secretions in the rabbit. Endocrinology. 1961;68:92–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Comer MT, Leese HJ, Southgate J. Induction of a differentiated ciliated cell phenotype in primary cultures of fallopian tube epithelium. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:3114–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Verhage HG, Fazleabas AT, Mavrogiannis PA, O’Day-Bowman MB, Donelly KM, Arias EB, Jaffe RC. The baboon oviduct: characteristics of an oestradiol-dependent oviduct-specific glycoprotein. Hum Reprod. 1997;3:541–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hunter RHF. Modulation of gamete and embryonic microenvironment by oviduct of glycoproteins. Mol Reprod Dev. 1994;39:176–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Johnson WL, Hunter AG. Seminal antigens: their alteration in the genital tract of female rabbits and during partial in vitro capacitation with beta amylase and beta glucuronidase. Biol Reprod. 1972;7(3):332–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Coppus SFPJ, Land JA, Opmeer BC, Teures P, Eijkemans MJC, Hompes PGA, Bossuyt PMM, van der Veen F, Mol BWJ, van der Steeg JW. Chlamydia trachomatis IgG seropositivity is associated with lower natural conception rates in ovulatory subfertile women without visible pathology. Human Reprod. 2011;26(11):3061–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Young RH, Clement PB. The fallopian tube and broad Ligament. In: Mills SE, editor. Sternberg’s diagnostic surgical pathology. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2010. pp. 2372–3004.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Neuer A, Lam KN, Tiller FW, Kiesel L, Witkin SS. Humoral immune response to membrane components of Chlamydia trachomatis and expression of human 60 kDa heat shock protein in follicular fluid of in-vitro fertilization patients. Hum Reprod. 1997;12:925–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sweet RL. Diagnosis and treatment of acute salpingitis. J Reprod Med. 1997;19(1):21–30.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Veenemans LMW, van der Linden PJQ. The value of Chlamydia trachomatis antibody testing in predicting tubal factor infertility. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(3):695–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kerin JF, Surrey ES, Williams DB, Daykhovsky L, Grundfest WS. Falloposcopic observations of endotubal isthmic plugs as a cause of reversible obstruction and their histological characterization. J Laparoendosc Surg. 1991;1:103–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sulak PJ, Letterie GS, Hayslip CC, Coddington CC, Klein TA. Hysteroscopic cannulation and lavage in the treatment of proximal tubal occlusion. Fertil Steril. 1987;48(3):493–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Confino E, Tur-Kaspa I, DeCherney A, Corfoman R, Coulam C, Robinson E, Haas G, Katz E, Vermesh M, Gleicher N. Transcervical balloon tuboplasty. A multicenter study. JAMA. 1990;264(16):2078–82.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Vandekerckhove P, Watson A, Likford R, et al. Therapeutic effect of oil-soluble and water-soluble media used for tubal patency testing (hysterosalpingography or laparoscopy) on pregnancy rates in infertility patients (Cochrane Review). In the Cochrane Library 1999, Issue 4. Update Software, Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Karasick S, Karasick D, Schilling J. Salpingitis isthmica nodosa in female infertility. J Can Assoc Radiol. 1985;36(2):118–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Young RH, Clement PB. The fallopian tube and broad Ligament. In: Mills SE, editor. Sternberg’s diagnostic surgical pathology, 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2010. pp. 2372–3004.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Jenkins CS, Williams SR, Schmidt GE. Salpingitis isthmica nodosa: a review of the literature, discussion of clinical significance, and consideration of patient management. Fertil Steril. 1993;60(4):599–607.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wrork OH, Broders AC. Adenomyosis of the fallopian tubes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1942;44:412–32.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Azad S, Chawla N, Kudesia S, Rai S, Singhal M. Salpingitis isthmica nodosa. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2009;52(3):434.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Majmudar B, Henderson PH, 3rd, Semple E. Salpingitis isthmica nodosa: a high-risk factor for tubal pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 1983;62(1):73–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Saracoglu FO, Mungan T, Tanzer F. Salpingitis isthmica nodosa in infertility and ectopic pregnancy. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1992;34(4):202–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Nogales-Ortiz F, Tarancon I, Nogales FF. The pathology of female genital tuberculosis. Obstet Gynecol. 1979;53:422–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Bonar BE, Rabson AS. Gynecologic aspects of leprosy. Obstet Gynecol. 1957;9:33–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Brooks JJ, Wheeler JA. Granulomatous salpingitis secondary to Crohn’s disease. Obstet Gynecol. 1977;49:S31–3.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Kay S. Sarcoidosis of the fallopian tubes. Report of a case. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1956;63:871–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. McEntee GP, Coughlan M, Corrigan T, Dervan P. Pelvic Inflammatory pseudotumor: problems in clinical and histolgical diagnosis. Case report. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1985;92:1067–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Clement PB, Young RH, Scully RE. Necrotic pseudoxanthomatous nodules of ovary and peritoneum in endometriosis. Am J Surg Pathol. 1988;12:390–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Herrera GA, Riemann BE, Greenberg HL. Pimentosus tubae, a new entity: light and electron microscopic study. Obstet Gynecol. 1983;61:S80–3.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Bell DA, Mondschein M, Scully RE. Giant cell arteritis of the female genital tract. A report of three cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 1986;10:696–701.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Paalman RJ, Dockerty MB, Mussey RD. Actinomycosis of ovaries and fallopian tubes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1949;58:419–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Westhoff C. IUDs and colonization or infection with actinomyces. Contraception. 2007;75(6):S48–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Kelly J, Aaron J. Pelvic actinomycosis and usage of intrauterine contraceptive devices. Yale J Bio Med. 1982;55:453–61.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Lee YC, Min D, Holcomb K, Buhl A, DiMaio T, Abulafia O. Computed tomography guided core needle biopsy diagnosis of pelvic actinomycosis. Gynecol Oncol. 2000;2:318–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Brihmer C, Kallings I, Nord CE, Brundin J. Salpingitis; aspects of diagnosis and etiology; a 4 year study from a Swedish capital hospital. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1987;24:211–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Braby HH, Dougherty CM, Mickal A. Actinomycosis of the female genital tract. Obstet Gynecol. 1964;23:580–3.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Murray JJ, Clark CA, Lands RH, Heim CR, Burnett LS. Reactivation blastomycosis presenting as a tuboovarian abscess. Obstet Gynecol. 1984;64:828–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Bylund DJ, Nanfro JJ, Marsh WL. Coccidiodomycosis of the female genital tract. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1986;110:232–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Abraham JL, Spore WW, Benirschke K. Cysticercosis of the fallopian tube: histology and microanalysis. Hum Pathol. 1982;13(7):665–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Nassberg S, McKay DG, Hertig AT. Physiological salpingitis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1954;67(1):130–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Smith HA, Greene RR. Physiologic endosalpingitis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1956;72(1):174–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Ringrose CAD. Clinical, etiological, and economic aspects of salpingitis. Can Med Assoc J. 1960;83(2):53–58.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Sheldon RS, Wilson RB, Dockerty MB. Serosal endometriosis of the fallopian tubes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1967;99:882–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Lisa JR, Gioia JD, Rubin IC. Observations on the interstitial portion of the fallopian tube. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1954;99:159–69.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. David MP, Ben-Zwi D, Kanger L. Tubal intramural polyps and their relationship to infertility. Fertil Steril. 1981;35:526–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Wansaicheong GK, Ong CL. Intramural tubal polyps—a villain in the shadows? Singap Med J. 1998;39(3):97–100.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Agarwal A, Gupta S, Sikka S. The role of free radicals and antioxidants in reproduction. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2006;18:325–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Bedaiwy MA, Falcone T, Sharma RK, Goldberg JM, Attaran M, Nelson DR, et al. Prediction of endometriosis with serum and peritoneal fluid markers: a prospective controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:426–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Mansour G, Goldberg J, Agarwal A, Sharma R, Mahfouz R, Falcone T. Correlation between sperm DNA damage, stage of endometriosis and the duration of infertility. ASRM 63rd annual meeting; 15–17 Oct. 2007; Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Baker MA, Aitken RJ. The importance of redox regulated pathways in sperm cell biology. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2004;216:47–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Osborn BH, Haney AF, Misukonis MA, Weinberg JB. Inducible nitric oxide synthase and alpha(v)beta(3) integrin in women with endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 2002;78:860–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Reeve L, Lashen H, Pacey AA. Endometriosis affects sperm-endosalpingeal interactions. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:448–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Lyons RA, Djahanbakhch O, Saridogan E, Naftalin AA, Mahmood T, Weekes A, Chenoy R. Peritoneal fluid, endometriosis, and ciliary beat frequency in the human fallopian tube. Lancet. 2002;360(9341):1221–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Qiao J, Yeung WS, Yao YQ, Ho PC. The effects of follicular fluid from patients with different indications for IVF treatment on the binding of human spermatozoa to the zona pellucida. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:128–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Pellicer A, Albert C, Garrido N, Navarro J, Remohi J, Simon C. The pathophysiology of endometriosis-associated infertility: follicular environment and embryo quality. J Reprod Fertil Suppl. 2000;55:109–19.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Noble LS, Takayama K, Zeitoun KM, Putnam JM, Johns DA, Hinshelwood MM, et al. Prostaglandin E2 stimulates aromatase expression in endometriosis-derived stromal cells. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1997;82:600–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Pellicer A, Albert C, Mercader A, Bonilla-Musoles F, Remohi J, Simon C. The follicular and endomcrine environment in women with endometriosis: local and systemic cytokine production. Fertil Steril. 1998;70:425–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Barnhart K, Dunsmoor R, Coutifaris C. Effect of endometriosis on in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2002;77:1148–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Siristatidis C, Bhattacharya S. Unexplained infertility: does it really exist? Does it matter? Hum Reprod. 2007;22(8):2084–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Hunt JL, Lynn AA. Histologic features of surgically removed fallopian tubes. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2002;126:951–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Pinero DA, Foraker AG. Aging in the fallopian tube. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1963;86:397–400.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Eddy CA, Flores JJ, Archer DR, Pauerstein CJ. The role of cilia in infertility: an evaluation by selective microsurgical modification of the rabbit oviduct. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1978;132(7):814–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Talbot P, Geiske C, Knoll M. Oocyte pickup by the mammalian oviduct. Mol Biol Cell. 1999;10:5–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Afzelius BA, Eliasson R. Male and female infertility problems in the immotile-cilia syndrome. Eur J Respir Dis Suppl. 1983;127:144–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Halbert SA, Tam BY, Blandau RJ. Egg transport in the rabbit oviduct: the roles of cilia and muscle. Science. 1976;191:1052–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Dixon RE, Hwang SJ, Hennig GW, Ramsey KH, Justin H, et al. Chlamydia infection causes loss of pacemaker cells and inhibits oocyte transport in the mouse oviduct. Biol Reprod. 2009;80(4):665–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. McComb PF, Halbert SA, Gomel V. Pregnancy, ciliary transport and the reversed ampullary segment of the rabbit fallopian tube. Fertil Steril. 1980;34:386–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Harper MJK. The mechanisms involved in the movement of newly ovulated eggs through the ampulla of the rabbit fallopian tube. J Reprod Fertil. 1961;2:522–4.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Blandau RJ, Gaddum-Rosse P. Mechanism of sperm transport in pig oviducts. Fertil Steril. 1974;25:61–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Howe GR, Black DL. Autonomic nervous system and oviduct function in the rabbit. J Reprod Fertil. 1973;13:425–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Boling JL, Blandau RJ. Egg transport through the ampulla of the oviducts of rabbits under various experimental conditions. Biol Reprod. 1971;4:174–84.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Wanggren K, Stavreus-Evers A, Olsson C, Andersson E, Gemzell-Danielsson K. Regulation of muscular contractions in the human fallopian tube through prostaglandis and progestagens. Hum Reprod. 2008;23:2359–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Dixon RE, Hwang SJ, Hennig GW, Ramsey KH, Schripsema JH, Sanders KM, Ward SM. Chlamydia infection causes loss of pacemaker cells and inhibits oocyte transport in the mouse oviduct. Biol Reprod. 2008;80:665–73.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Popescu LM, Ciontea SM, Cretoiu D. Interstitial Cajal-like cell in human uterus and fallopian tube. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007;1101:139–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Boivin J, Griffiths E, Venetis CA. Emotional distress in infertile women and failure of assisted reproductive technologies: meta-analysis of prospective psychosocial studies. Br Med J. 2011;342:223–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Confino E, Friberg J, Gleicher N. Transcervical balloon tuboplasty. Fertil Steril. 1986;46:963–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Hershlag A, Seifer DB, Carcangiu ML, Patton DL, Diamond MP, DeCherney AH. Salpingoscopy: light microscopic and electron microscopic correlations. Obstet Gynecol. 1991;77(3):399–405.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Kerin JF, Surrey ES, Williams DB, Daykhovsky L, Grundfest WS. Falloposcopic observations of endotubal isthmic plugs as a cause of reversible obstruction and their histiological characterization. J Laparoendosc Surg. 1991;1(2):103–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Kerin JF, Williams DB, San Roman GA, Pearlstone AC, Grundfest WS, Surrey ES. Falloposcopic classification and treatment of fallopian tube lumen disease. Fertil Steril. 1992;57(4):731–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Nakawaga K, Inoue M, Nishi Y, Sugiyama R, Motoyama K, Kuribayashi Y, Akira S, Sugiyama R. A new evaluation score that uses salpingoscopy to reflect fallopian tube function in infertile women. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(7):2753–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Fortier KJ, Haney AF. The pathologic spectrum of uterotubal junction obstruction. Obstet Gynecol. 1985;65(1):93–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Punnonen R, Söderström KO, Alanen A. Isthmic tubal occlusion: etiology and histology. Acta Eur Fertil. 1984;15(1):39–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Zhang D, Zeng Y, Chen X. Pathological findings of proximal tubal occlusive infertility. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 1995;30(6):352–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Wiedemann R, Sterzik K, Gombisch V, Stuckensen J, Montag M. Beyond recanalizing proximal tube occlusion: the argument for further diagnosis and classification. Hum Reprod. 1996;11(5):986–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Honore GM, Holden AE, Schenken RS. Pathophysiology and management of proximal tubal blockage. Fertil Steril. 1999;5:785–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. American Fertility Society. The American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, Mullerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions. Fertil Steril. 1988;49:944–55.

    Google Scholar 

  97. Boeckxstaens A, Devroey P, Collins J, Tournaye H. Getting pregnant after tubal sterilization: surgical reversal or IVF? Hum Reprod. 2007;22:2660–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, North Shore-Long Island Jewish Hospital of Hofstra University School of Medicine, 300 Community Drive, 11030, Manhasset, NY, USA

    Thalia R. Segal & Avner Hershlag MD

Authors
  1. Thalia R. Segal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Avner Hershlag MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Avner Hershlag MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Ronald O. Perelman and Claudia Cohen Center for Reproductive Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA

    Glenn L. Schattman

  2. Andrology and Human Reproduction Clinic Referral Center for Male Reproduction, ANDROFERT, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil

    Sandro C. Esteves

  3. Andrology Center & Center for Reproductive Medicine, Lerner College of Medicine Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA

    Ashok Agarwal

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Segal, T., Hershlag, A. (2015). Fallopian Tube Dysfunction in Unexplained Infertility. In: Schattman, G., Esteves, S., Agarwal, A. (eds) Unexplained Infertility. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2140-9_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2140-9_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-2139-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-2140-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation