Abstract
The capacity of the brain to reorganize in response to changes in stimulation plays a critical, yet poorly understood, role in the successful outcome of allogeneic hand transplants. Here, I begin by reviewing evidence on intra and interhemispheric changes in functional organizations that follow upper extremity amputation. The absence of data prior to limb loss makes it impossible to determine whether these changes are fully reversed following hand transplantation. However, accumulating data suggest that areas of the sensory and motor cortex that likely were devoted to representing the hand prior to amputation do come to represent the transplanted hand, even after years or decades of complete loss of afferent and efferent communication. Nevertheless, at least some amputation-related cortical changes may persist even long after a transplant. These results are consistent with a model in which restoration of afferent and efferent signals between hand and brain enables gross recovery of cortical organization through reactivation of existing networks. However, recovery of finer-grained details of the cortical maps requires experience-dependent changes, due to peripheral reinnervation errors and lower-level structural reorganization, recovering finer-grained details of cortical maps requires experience-dependent changes. These latter changes evolve slowly, are essential to achieve optimal sensory and motor functions, and stand to benefit from advances in evidence-based neurorehabilitation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Florence SL, Kaas JH. Large-scale reorganization at multiple levels of the somatosensory pathway follows therapeutic amputation of the hand in monkeys. J Neurosci. 1995;15(12):8083–95.
Jones EG. Cortical and subcortical contributions to activity-dependent plasticity in primate somatosensory cortex. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2000;23:1–37.
Kaas JH. Plasticity of sensory and motor maps in adult mammals. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1991;14:137–67.
Kaas JH, Merzenich MM, Killackey HP. The reorganization of somatosensory cortex following peripheral nerve damage in adult and developing mammals. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1983;6:325–56.
Wu CW, Kaas JH. The effects of long-standing limb loss on anatomical reorganization of the somatosensory afferents in the brainstem and spinal cord. Somatosens Mot Res. 2002;19(2):153–63.
Pons TP, et al. Massive cortical reorganization after sensory deafferentation in adult macaques. Science. 1991;252(5014):1857–60.
Ramachandran VS, Rogers-Ramachandran D, Stewart M. Perceptual correlates of massive cortical reorganization. Science. 1992;258(5085):1159–60.
Merzenich MM, et al. Topographic reorganization of somatosensory cortical areas 3b and 1 in adult monkeys following restricted deafferentation. Neuroscience. 1983;8(1):33–55.
Merzenich MM, et al. Progression of change following median nerve section in the cortical representation of the hand in areas 3b and 1 in adult owl and squirrel monkeys. Neuroscience. 1983;10(3):639–65.
Wall JT, Felleman DJ, Kaas JH. Recovery of normal topography in the somatosensory cortex of monkeys after nerve crush and regeneration. Science. 1983;221(4612):771–3.
Sperry RW. The problem of central nervous reorganization after nerve regeneration and muscle transposition. Q Rev Biol. 1945;20:311–69.
Penfield W, Boldrey E. Somatotopic motor and sesnory representation in the cerebral cortex of man as studied by electrical stimulation. Brain. 1937;60:389–443.
Sanes JN, Donoghue JP. Plasticity and primary motor cortex. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2000;23:393–415.
Kaas JH. The reorganization of somatosensory and motor cortex after peripheral nerve or spinal cord injury in primates. Prog Brain Res. 2000;128:173–9.
Garraghty PE, Kaas JH. Large-scale functional reorganization in adult monkey cortex after peripheral nerve injury. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1991;88(16):6976–80.
Merzenich MM, et al. Somatosensory cortical map changes following digit amputation in adult monkeys. J Comp Neurol. 1984;224(4):591–605.
Merzenich MM, Jenkins WM. Reorganization of cortical representations of the hand following alterations of skin inputs induced by nerve injury, skin island transfers, and experience. J Hand Ther. 1993;6(2):89–104.
Buonomano DV, Merzenich MM. Cortical plasticity: from synapses to maps. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1998;21:149–86.
Qi HX, Stepniewska I, Kaas JH. Reorganization of primary motor cortex in adult macaque monkeys with long-standing amputations. J Neurophysiol. 2000;84(4):2133–47.
Florence SL, Taub HB, Kaas JH. Large-scale sprouting of cortical connections after peripheral injury in adult macaque monkeys. Science. 1998;282(5391):1117–21.
Cohen LG, et al. Topographic maps of human motor cortex in normal and pathological conditions: mirror movements, amputations and spinal cord injuries. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl. 1991;43:36–50.
Lotze M, Flor H, Grodd W, Larbig W, Birbaumer N. Phantom movements and pain. An fMRI study in upper limb amputees. Brain. 2001;124(Pt 11):2268–77.
Karl A, Birbaumer N, Lutzenberger W, Cohen LG, Flor H. Reorganization of motor and somatosensory cortex in upper extremity amputees with phantom limb pain. J Neurosci. 2001;21(10):3609–18.
Kew JJ, et al. Abnormal access of axial vibrotactile input to deafferented somatosensory cortex in human upper limb amputees. J Neurophysiol. 1997;77(5):2753–64.
Elbert T, et al. Extensive reorganization of the somatosensory cortex in adult humans after nervous system injury. Neuroreport. 1994;5(18):2593–7.
Flor H, et al. Phantom-limb pain as a perceptual correlate of cortical reorganization following arm amputation. Nature. 1995;375(6531):482–4.
Yang TT, et al. Noninvasive detection of cerebral plasticity in adult human somatosensory cortex. Neuroreport. 1994;5(6):701–4.
Schwenkreis P, et al. Changes of cortical excitability in patients with upper limb amputation. Neurosci Lett. 2000;293(2):143–6.
Schwenkreis P, et al. Assessment of reorganization in the sensorimotor cortex after upper limb amputation. Clin Neurophysiol. 2001;112(4):627–35.
Draganski B, et al. Decrease of thalamic gray matter following limb amputation. Neuroimage. 2006;31(3):951–7.
Makin TR, et al. Phantom pain is associated with preserved structure and function in the former hand area. Nat Commun. 2013;4:1570.
Calford MB, Tweedale R. Interhemispheric transfer of plasticity in the cerebral cortex. Science. 1990;249(4970):805–7.
Pawela CP, et al. Interhemispheric neuroplasticity following limb deafferentation detected by resting-state functional connectivity magnetic resonance imaging (fcMRI) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Neuroimage. 2010;49(3):2467–78.
Bogdanov S, Smith J, Frey SH. Former hand territory activity increases after amputation during intact hand movements, but is unaffected by illusory visual feedback. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012;26(6):604–15.
Kew JJ, et al. Reorganization of cortical blood flow and transcranial magnetic stimulation maps in human subjects after upper limb amputation. J Neurophysiol. 1994;72(5):2517–24.
Philip B, Bogdanov S, Frey, SH. Execution of a precision manual drawing task with the nondominant hand in amputees and controls. In Annual Meeting of the Society for Neuroscience (Washington, DC); 2011.
Wrigley PJ, et al. Neuropathic pain and primary somatosensory cortex reorganization following spinal cord injury. Pain. 2009;141(1/2):52–9.
Maihofner C, et al. The motor system shows adaptive changes in complex regional pain syndrome. Brain. 2007;130(Pt 10):2671–87.
Maihofner C, Handwerker HO, Neundorfer B, Birklein F. Patterns of cortical reorganization in complex regional pain syndrome. Neurology. 2003;61(12):1707–15.
Flor H. Maladaptive plasticity, memory for pain and phantom limb pain: review and suggestions for new therapies. Expert Rev Neurother. 2008;8(5):809–18.
Simoes EL, et al. Functional expansion of sensorimotor representation and structural reorganization of callosal connections in lower limb amputees. J Neurosci. 2012;32(9):3211–20.
Flor H, Diers M, Andoh J. The neural basis of phantom limb pain. Trends Cogn Sci. 2013;17(7):307–8.
Button KS, et al. Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013;14(5):365–76.
Almquist E, Eeg-Olofsson O. Sensory-nerve-conduction velocity and two-point discrimination in sutured nerves. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1970;52(4):791–96.
Wall JT, Kaas JH. Long-term cortical consequences of reinnervation errors after nerve regeneration in monkeys. Brain Res. 1986;372(2):400–4.
Haber WB. Reactions to loss of limb: physiological and psychological aspects. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1958;74(1):14–24.
Katz D. Psychologische versuch mit amputierten. Z Psychol Physiol. 1920;85:83–117.
Teuber H-L, Krieger HP, Bender MB. Reorganization of sensory function in amputation stumps: two points discrimination. Fed Proc. 1949;8:156.
Moore CE, Schady W. Investigation of the functional correlates of reorganization within the human somatosensory cortex. Brain. 2000;123(Pt 9):1883–95.
Vega-Bermudez F, Johnson KO. Spatial acuity after digit amputation. Brain. 2002;125(Pt 6):1256–64.
Philip BA, Frey SH. Preserved grip selection planning in chronic unilateral upper extremity amputees. Exp Brain Res. 2011;214(3):437–52.
Dhillon GS, Lawrence SM, Hutchinson DT, Horch KW. Residual function in peripheral nerve stumps of amputees: implications for neural control of artificial limbs. J Hand Surg Am. 2004;29(4):605–15; discussion 616–608.
Dhillon GS, Kruger TB, Sandhu JS, Horch KW. Effects of short-term training on sensory and motor function in severed nerves of long-term human amputees. J Neurophysiol 93(5):2625–33.
Jia X, et al. Residual motor signal in long-term human severed peripheral nerves and feasibility of neural signal-controlled artificial limb. J Hand Surg Am. 2007;32(5):657–66.
Reilly KT, Mercier C, Schieber MH, Sirigu A. Persistent hand motor commands in the amputees’ brain. Brain 2006;129(Pt 8):2211–23.
Roricht S, Meyer BU. Residual function in motor cortex contralateral to amputated hand. Neurology. 2000;54(4):984–7.
Stoll G, Muller HW. Nerve injury, axonal degeneration and neural regeneration: basic insights. Brain Pathol. 1999;9(2):313–25.
Florence SL, et al. Central reorganization of sensory pathways following peripheral nerve regeneration in fetal monkeys. Nature. 1996;381(6577):69–71.
Fox K, Glazewski S, Schulze S. Plasticity and stability of somatosensory maps in thalamus and cortex. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2000;10(4):494–7.
Petersen CC. The functional organization of the barrel cortex. Neuron. 2007;56(2):339–55.
Bjorkman A, Waites A, Rosen B, Larsson EM, Lundborg G. Cortical reintegration of a replanted hand and an osseointegrated thumb prosthesis. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2007;100:109–12.
Bjorkman A, Waites A, Rosen B, Lundborg G, Larsson EM. Cortical sensory and motor response in a patient whose hand has been replanted: one-year follow up with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2007;41(2):70–6.
Eickhoff SB, et al. Central adaptation following heterotopic hand replantation probed by fMRI and effective connectivity analysis. Exp Neurol. 2008;212(1):132–44.
Giraux P, Sirigu A, Schneider F, Dubernard JM. Cortical reorganization in motor cortex after graft of both hands. Nat Neurosci 2001;4(7):691–2.
Lanzetta M, et al. Early use of artificial sensibility in hand transplantation. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2004;38(2):106–11.
Brenneis C, et al. Cortical motor activation patterns following hand transplantation and replantation. J Hand Surg. 2005;30(5):530–3.
Breidenbach WC, et al. Outcomes of the first 2 American hand transplants at 8 and 6 years posttransplant. J Hand Surg. 2008;33(7):1039–47.
Vargas CD, et al. Re-emergence of hand-muscle representations in human motor cortex after hand allograft. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(17):7197–202.
Neugroschl C, et al. Functional MRI activation of somatosensory and motor cortices in a hand-grafted patient with early clinical sensorimotor recovery. Eur Radiol. 2005;15(9):1806–14.
Frey SH, Bogdanov S, Smith JC, Watrous S, Breidenbach WC. Chronically deafferented sensory cortex recovers a grossly typical organization after allogenic hand transplantation. Curr Biol. 2008;18(19):1530–4.
Smith J, Bogdanov, S., Watrous, S., Frey, SH. Rapid digit mapping in the human brain at 3T in 17th Annual Meeting of the International Society for Magnet Resonance (ISMRM) in Medicine. (Honolulu); 2009.
Smith J, Frey, SH. Use of independent component analysis to define regions of interest for fMRI studies in 18th Annual Meeting of the International Society for Magnet Resonance (ISMRM) in Medicine. (Montreal); 2011.
Eickhoff SB, Grefkes C, Fink GR, Zilles K. Functional lateralization of face, hand, and trunk representation in anatomically defined human somatosensory areas. Cereb Cortex. 2008;18(12):2820–30.
Binkofski F, et al. Human anterior intraparietal area subserves prehension: a combined lesion and functional MRI activation study. Neurology. 1998;50(5):1253–9.
Culham JC, et al. Visually guided grasping produces fMRI activation in dorsal but not ventral stream brain areas. Exp Brain Res. 2003;153(2):180–9.
Frey SH, Vinton D, Norlund R, Grafton ST. Cortical topography of human anterior intraparietal cortex active during visually guided grasping. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005;23(2/3):397–405.
Schady W, Braune S, Watson S, Torebjork HE, Schmidt R. Responsiveness of the somatosensory system after nerve injury and amputation in the human hand. Ann Neurol. 1994;36(1):68–75.
Acknowledgments
In alphabetical order, the author wishes to acknowledge the essential contributions of Drs. Sergei Bogdanov, Warren Breidenbach III, Christina Kaufman, Joseph Kutz, and Jolinda Smith to the research described. Preparation of this chapter was supported by the USAMRMC (W81XWH-10-1-1020), and the NIH (NS083377) to S.H.F.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Frey, S. (2015). Why Brain Science is Essential to the Success of Hand Allotransplantation. In: Brandacher, G. (eds) The Science of Reconstructive Transplantation. Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2071-6_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2071-6_21
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-2070-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-2071-6
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)