Skip to main content

Transitioning Diagnostic Molecular Pathology to the Genomic Era: Cancer Somatic Mutation Panel Testing

  • Chapter
Molecular Testing in Cancer

Abstract

The ongoing discovery and validation of cancer molecular biomarkers, as well as their use in the design of targeted therapies, is shifting oncology from tissue- and disease-based treatments to molecular target-based protocols. Conventional methods of cancer genotyping (e.g., cytogenetics, FISH, PCR) are often insufficient for efficiently capturing the molecular complexity of the cancer genome, while next-generation sequencing (NGS), which promises to revolutionize the field, still needs several more years of maturation before it is ready for generalized clinical use. To bridge this divide between traditional assays and the coming NGS era, relatively simple multiplexed diagnostic assays have been developed that use existing molecular techniques to provide high-content molecular information in an efficient and cost-effective manner. One example of such an approach is SNaPshot, a robust and highly sensitive tumor genotyping technique whose only major instrumentation requirement is a capillary electrophoresis-automated DNA sequencer. In this chapter, we will use this assay as an example of current methods for high-throughput clinical genotyping during the transition of diagnostic molecular pathology to the genomic era.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Toward precision medicine: building a knowledge network for biomedical research and a new taxonomy of disease. National Research Council of the National Academies. 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dias Santagata D, Akhavanfard S, David S, Vernovsky K, Kuhlmann G, Boisvert S, et al. Rapid targeted mutational analysis of human tumours: a clinical platform to guide personalized cancer medicine. EMBO Mol Med. 2010;2:146–58.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Hudson TJ, Anderson W, Artez A, Barker A, Bell C, Bernabé R, et al. International network of cancer genome projects. Nature. 2010;464:993–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dancey JE, Bedard PL, Onetto N, Hudson TJ. The genetic basis for cancer treatment decisions. Cell. 2012;148:409–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. MacConaill L, Garraway L. Clinical implications of the cancer genome. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:5219–28.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Ong F, Das K, Wang J, Vakil H, Kuo J, Blackwell W-L, et al. Personalized medicine and pharmacogenetic biomarkers: progress in molecular oncology testing. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2012;12:593–602.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Papaemmanuil E, Cazzola M, Boultwood J, Malcovati L, Vyas P, Bowen D, et al. Somatic SF3B1 mutation in myelodysplasia with ring sideroblasts. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:1384–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Treon S, Xu L, Yang G, Zhou Y, Liu X, Cao Y, et al. MYD88 L265P somatic mutation in Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:826–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Arteaga CL, Baselga J. Impact of genomics on personalized cancer medicine. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18:612–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Stratton MR. Exploring the genomes of cancer cells: progress and promise. Science. 2011;331:1553–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wong K, Hudson T, McPherson J. Unraveling the genetics of cancer: genome sequencing and beyond. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2011;12:407–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Pleasance E, Cheetham RK, Stephens P, McBride D, Humphray S, Greenman C, et al. A comprehensive catalogue of somatic mutations from a human cancer genome. Nature. 2010;463:191–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Gerlinger M, Rowan A, Horswell S, Larkin J, Endesfelder D, Gronroos E, et al. Intratumor heterogeneity and branched evolution revealed by multiregion sequencing. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:883–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Maemondo M, Inoue A, Kobayashi K, Sugawara S, Oizumi S, Isobe H, et al. Gefitinib or chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer with mutated EGFR. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:2380–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Di Nicolantonio F, Martini M, Molinari F, Sartore Bianchi A, Arena S, Saletti P, et al. Wild-type BRAF is required for response to panitumumab or cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:5705–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pao W, Wang T, Riely G, Miller V, Pan Q, Ladanyi M, et al. KRAS mutations and primary resistance of lung adenocarcinomas to gefitinib or erlotinib. PLoS Med. 2005;2:e17-e.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Campbell P, Yachida S, Mudie L, Stephens P, Pleasance E, Stebbings L, et al. The patterns and dynamics of genomic instability in metastatic pancreatic cancer. Nature. 2010;467:1109–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Jones S, Laskin J, Li Y, Griffith O, An J, Bilenky M, et al. Evolution of an adenocarcinoma in response to selection by targeted kinase inhibitors. Genome Biol. 2010;11:R82-R.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yachida S, Jones S, Bozic I, Antal T, Leary R, Fu B, et al. Distant metastasis occurs late during the genetic evolution of pancreatic cancer. Nature. 2010;467:1114–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Knijn N, Mekenkamp LJM, Klomp M, Vink-Börger ME, Tol J, Teerenstra S, et al. KRAS mutation analysis: a comparison between primary tumours and matched liver metastases in 305 colorectal cancer patients. Br J Cancer. 2011;104:1020–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Santini D, Loupakis F, Vincenzi B, Floriani I, Stasi I, Canestrari E, et al. High concordance of KRAS status between primary colorectal tumors and related metastatic sites: Implications for clinical practice. Oncologist. 2008;13:1270–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Jensen JD, Laenkholm A-V, Knoop A, Ewertz M, Bandaru R, Liu W, et al. PIK3CA mutations may be discordant between primary and corresponding metastatic disease in breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17:667–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Estep A, Palmer C, McCormick F, Rauen K. Mutation analysis of BRAF, MEK1 and MEK2 in 15 ovarian cancer cell lines: implications for therapy. PLoS One. 2007;2:e1279.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Bang Y-J, Van Cutsem E, Feyereislova A, Chung H, Shen L, Sawaki A, et al. Trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (ToGA): a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;376:687–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Fleming G, Sill M, Darcy K, McMeekin DS, Thigpen JT, Adler L, et al. Phase II trial of trastuzumab in women with advanced or recurrent, HER2-positive endometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol. 2010;116:15–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Iris Schrijver M.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wilson, K.D., Schrijver, I. (2014). Transitioning Diagnostic Molecular Pathology to the Genomic Era: Cancer Somatic Mutation Panel Testing. In: Yousef, G., Jothy, S. (eds) Molecular Testing in Cancer. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-8050-2_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-8050-2_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-8049-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-8050-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics