Summary
Acute, paralyzed, spinal cats were used to examine extinction and retention parameters as well as the involvement of cutaneous afferent terminals in classical conditioning of a hindlimb flexor nerve response. The CS consisted of a train of pulses delivered to the superficial peroneal (sensory) nerve and the UCS was a 50 V shock delivered to the ankle skin of the same hind leg. Conditions was measured as an increase in the response amplitude of the deep peroneal (motor) nerve. First, the effects of presenting massed vs. distributed extinction trials were explored. Conditioned response amplitude decrements were found when 60 extinction trials were administered immediately after aquisition at a rate of one per minute (massed condition). These decrements were not apparent when one extinction trial was delivered every ten minutes (distributed condition). From this data it is apparent that the conditioned response increase does not fall off spontaneously over a two hour period. In the second experiment, significant differences were not found between groups of animals allowed 1/2, 1, 2, 3, or 4 hr. between acquisition and extinction trials. These results were interpreted to indicate that response amplitude increases noted during acquisition were not the product of simple sensitization. Finally, excitability changs involving cutaneous afferent terminals were studied using the antidromic invasion technique. No tonic or phasic excitability changes were found over the course of training. This finding indicates that presynaptic facilitation is not involved in response amplitude increases observed during classical conditioning of the cat hindlimb flexor nerve response.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Carew, T.J., Walters, E.T., and Kandel, E.R., 1981, Associative learning in aplysia: Cellular correlates supporting a conditioned fear hypothesis. Science 211: 501.
Durkovic, R.G., 1975, Classical conditioning, sensitization, and habituation of the flexion reflex of the spinal cat. Physiol. Behay. 14:297.
Fitzgerald, L.A., and Thompson, R.F., 1967, Classical conditioning of the hindlimb flexion reflex in the acute spinal cat. Psychon. Sci., 8: 213.
Gormezano, I., 1966, Classical conditioning. In Experimental Methods and Instrumentation J. Sidowski (Ed.), McGraw-Hill: NY.
Kellogg, W.N., Deese, J., and Pronko, N.H., 1946, On the behavior of the lumbo-spinal dog. J. Exp. Psych. 36:503.
Kirk, R.E., 1968, Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences. Wadsworth: Belmont, California.
Lloyd, A.J., Wikler, A., and Whitehouse, J.M., 1969, Nonconditionability of flexor reflex in the chronic spinal dog. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 68:576.
Norman, R.J., Villablanca, J.R., Brown, K.A., Schwafel, J.A., and Buchwald, J.S., 1974, classical eyeblink conditioning in the bilaterally hemispherectomized cat. Exper. Neurol. 44:363.
Oakley, D.A., and Russell, I.S., 1974, Differential and reversal conditioning in partially neodecorticate rabbits. Physiol. Behay. 13:221.
Patterson, M.M., 1975a, Effects of forward and backward classical conditioning procedures on a spinal cat hind-limb flexor nerve response. Physiol. Psychol. 3:86.
Patterson, M.M., 1975b, Interstimulus interval effects on a classical conditioning paradigm in the acute spinalized cat. Paper presented at the Society for Neuroscience, New York, November.
Patterson, M.M., 1976, Mechanisms of classical conditioning and fixation in spinal mammals. In Advances in Psychobiology, Vol III. Riesen,A., and Thompson, R.F. (Eds.), Wiley: NY.
Patterson, MM., 1980, Mechanisms of classical conditioning of spinal reflexes. In Neural Mechanisms of Goal-directed Behavior and Learning. R.F. Thompson, L.H. Hicks and J.B. Shvyrkov (Eds), Academic Press: NY.
Patterson, M.M., Cegayske, C.F., and Thompson, R.F., 1973, Effects of a classical conditioning paradigm on hind-limb flexor nerve response in immobilized spinal cats. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 84:88.
Schmaltz, L.W., and Theios, J., 1972, Acquisition and extinction of a classically conditioned response in hippocampectomized rabbits(Oryctolygus cuniculus). J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 79:328.
Shurrager, P.S., and Culler, E.A., 1938, Phenomena allied to con- ditioning in the spinal dog. Amer. J. Physiol. 123:186.
Shurrager, P.S., and Culler, E.A., 1940, Conditioning in the spinal dog. J. Exp. Psychol. 26:133.
Smith, M., Coleman, S., and Gormezano, I., 1969, Classical conditioning of the rabbit’s nictitating membrane response at backward, simultaneous, and forward CS-UCS intervals. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 69:226.
Thompson, R.F., Berger, T.W., and Berry, S.D., 1980, Brain mechanisms of learning. In R.F. Thompson, L.H. Hicks and V.B.Shvyrkov (Eds), Neural Mechanisms of Goal-directed Behavior and Learning Academic Press: NY.
Thompson, R.F., Patterson, M.M., and Teyler, T., 1972, Neurophysiology of learning. Annual Review of Psychology 23: 73.
Wall, P.D., 1958, Excitability changes in afferent fibre terminations and their relation to slow potentials. J. Physiol. (Lond.), 142:1.
Walters, E.T., Carew, T.J., and Kandel, E.R., 1979, Classical conditioning in aplysia californica. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 76(12):6675.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1982 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Patterson, M.M., Steinmetz, J.E., Beggs, A.L., Romano, A.G. (1982). Associative Processes in Spinal Reflexes. In: Woody, C.D. (eds) Conditioning. Advances in Behavioral Biology, vol 26. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-0701-4_42
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-0701-4_42
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-0703-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-0701-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive