Conditioning pp 637-650 | Cite as

Associative Processes in Spinal Reflexes

  • Michael M. Patterson
  • Joseph E. Steinmetz
  • Alvin L. Beggs
  • Anthony G. Romano
Part of the Advances in Behavioral Biology book series (ABBI, volume 26)


Acute, paralyzed, spinal cats were used to examine extinction and retention parameters as well as the involvement of cutaneous afferent terminals in classical conditioning of a hindlimb flexor nerve response. The CS consisted of a train of pulses delivered to the superficial peroneal (sensory) nerve and the UCS was a 50 V shock delivered to the ankle skin of the same hind leg. Conditions was measured as an increase in the response amplitude of the deep peroneal (motor) nerve. First, the effects of presenting massed vs. distributed extinction trials were explored. Conditioned response amplitude decrements were found when 60 extinction trials were administered immediately after aquisition at a rate of one per minute (massed condition). These decrements were not apparent when one extinction trial was delivered every ten minutes (distributed condition). From this data it is apparent that the conditioned response increase does not fall off spontaneously over a two hour period. In the second experiment, significant differences were not found between groups of animals allowed 1/2, 1, 2, 3, or 4 hr. between acquisition and extinction trials. These results were interpreted to indicate that response amplitude increases noted during acquisition were not the product of simple sensitization. Finally, excitability changs involving cutaneous afferent terminals were studied using the antidromic invasion technique. No tonic or phasic excitability changes were found over the course of training. This finding indicates that presynaptic facilitation is not involved in response amplitude increases observed during classical conditioning of the cat hindlimb flexor nerve response.


Conditioned Stimulus Classical Conditioning Trial Block Extinction Trial Associative Process 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Carew, T.J., Walters, E.T., and Kandel, E.R., 1981, Associative learning in aplysia: Cellular correlates supporting a conditioned fear hypothesis. Science 211: 501.Google Scholar
  2. Durkovic, R.G., 1975, Classical conditioning, sensitization, and habituation of the flexion reflex of the spinal cat. Physiol. Behay. 14:297.Google Scholar
  3. Fitzgerald, L.A., and Thompson, R.F., 1967, Classical conditioning of the hindlimb flexion reflex in the acute spinal cat. Psychon. Sci., 8: 213.Google Scholar
  4. Gormezano, I., 1966, Classical conditioning. In Experimental Methods and Instrumentation J. Sidowski (Ed.), McGraw-Hill: NY.Google Scholar
  5. Kellogg, W.N., Deese, J., and Pronko, N.H., 1946, On the behavior of the lumbo-spinal dog. J. Exp. Psych. 36:503.Google Scholar
  6. Kirk, R.E., 1968, Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences. Wadsworth: Belmont, California.Google Scholar
  7. Lloyd, A.J., Wikler, A., and Whitehouse, J.M., 1969, Nonconditionability of flexor reflex in the chronic spinal dog. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 68:576.Google Scholar
  8. Norman, R.J., Villablanca, J.R., Brown, K.A., Schwafel, J.A., and Buchwald, J.S., 1974, classical eyeblink conditioning in the bilaterally hemispherectomized cat. Exper. Neurol. 44:363.Google Scholar
  9. Oakley, D.A., and Russell, I.S., 1974, Differential and reversal conditioning in partially neodecorticate rabbits. Physiol. Behay. 13:221.Google Scholar
  10. Patterson, M.M., 1975a, Effects of forward and backward classical conditioning procedures on a spinal cat hind-limb flexor nerve response. Physiol. Psychol. 3:86.Google Scholar
  11. Patterson, M.M., 1975b, Interstimulus interval effects on a classical conditioning paradigm in the acute spinalized cat. Paper presented at the Society for Neuroscience, New York, November.Google Scholar
  12. Patterson, M.M., 1976, Mechanisms of classical conditioning and fixation in spinal mammals. In Advances in Psychobiology, Vol III. Riesen,A., and Thompson, R.F. (Eds.), Wiley: NY.Google Scholar
  13. Patterson, MM., 1980, Mechanisms of classical conditioning of spinal reflexes. In Neural Mechanisms of Goal-directed Behavior and Learning. R.F. Thompson, L.H. Hicks and J.B. Shvyrkov (Eds), Academic Press: NY.Google Scholar
  14. Patterson, M.M., Cegayske, C.F., and Thompson, R.F., 1973, Effects of a classical conditioning paradigm on hind-limb flexor nerve response in immobilized spinal cats. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 84:88.Google Scholar
  15. Schmaltz, L.W., and Theios, J., 1972, Acquisition and extinction of a classically conditioned response in hippocampectomized rabbits(Oryctolygus cuniculus). J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 79:328.Google Scholar
  16. Shurrager, P.S., and Culler, E.A., 1938, Phenomena allied to con- ditioning in the spinal dog. Amer. J. Physiol. 123:186.Google Scholar
  17. Shurrager, P.S., and Culler, E.A., 1940, Conditioning in the spinal dog. J. Exp. Psychol. 26:133.Google Scholar
  18. Smith, M., Coleman, S., and Gormezano, I., 1969, Classical conditioning of the rabbit’s nictitating membrane response at backward, simultaneous, and forward CS-UCS intervals. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 69:226.Google Scholar
  19. Thompson, R.F., Berger, T.W., and Berry, S.D., 1980, Brain mechanisms of learning. In R.F. Thompson, L.H. Hicks and V.B.Shvyrkov (Eds), Neural Mechanisms of Goal-directed Behavior and Learning Academic Press: NY.Google Scholar
  20. Thompson, R.F., Patterson, M.M., and Teyler, T., 1972, Neurophysiology of learning. Annual Review of Psychology 23: 73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wall, P.D., 1958, Excitability changes in afferent fibre terminations and their relation to slow potentials. J. Physiol. (Lond.), 142:1.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Walters, E.T., Carew, T.J., and Kandel, E.R., 1979, Classical conditioning in aplysia californica. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 76(12):6675.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael M. Patterson
    • 1
  • Joseph E. Steinmetz
    • 1
  • Alvin L. Beggs
    • 1
  • Anthony G. Romano
    • 1
  1. 1.College of Osteopathic Medicine and Department of PsychologyOhio UniversityAthensUSA

Personalised recommendations