Summary
The firing rates of hippocampal units vary as a function of the animal’s position in space. For example, on an elevated radial maze a particular cell might show enhanced activity on one arm. In intact rats, if the maze is rotated within the environment, the place field of the cell persists with respect to the environment and not to the maze. Lesions of the fornix or entorhinal cortex reduce the robustness of place field activity and severely disrupt persistence with respect to the environment.
In blind and deaf rats hippocampal cells have place fields. Following maze rotation the place fields of most cells (11 of 15) remain on the original arm of the maze. In the other (4) cells the place fields persist with respect to the environment, but spinning the rat, to disturb vestibular function, disrupts this environmental persistence. Thus removal of sensory information has similar effects on hippocampal place cell activity as does lesions of hippocampal connections.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Best, M. R., and Best, P. J., 1976, The effects of state of consciousness and latent inhibition on hippocampal unit activity during conditioning, Exp. Neurol., 51: 564.
Best, P. J., Knowles, W. D., and Phillips, I. M., 1978, Chronic brain unit recording for pharmacological applications, J. Pharmacol. Methods, 1: 161.
Best, P. J., and Ranck, J. B., Jr., Reliability of the relationship between hippocampal unit activity and sensory-behavioral events in the rat, Exp. Neurol. in press.
Hill, A. J., 1978, First occurrence of hippocampal spatial firing in a new environment, Exp. Neurol., 62: 282.
Hill, A. J., 1979, Unpublished doctoral dissertation.
Jones, E. G., and Powell, T. P. S., 1970, An anatomical study of converging sensory pathways within the cerebral cortex of the monkey, Brain, 93: 793.
Miller, V. M., and Best, P. J., 1980, Spatial correlates of hippocampal unit activity are altered by lesions of the fornix and entorhinal cortex, Brain Res., 194: 311.
O’Keefe, J., 1976, Place units in the hippocampus of the freely moving rat, Exp. Neurol., 51: 78.
O’Keefe, J., and Conway, D. H., 1978, Hippocampal place units in the freely moving rat: why they fire when they fire, Exp. Brain Res., 31: 573.
O’Keefe, J., and Dostrovsky, T., 1971, The hippocampus as a spatial map: Preliminary evidence from unit activity in the freely moving rat, Brain Res., 34: 171.
O’Keefe, J., and Nadel, L., 1978, “The Hippocampus as a Cognitive Map,” Claranden Press, Oxford.
O’Keefe, J., Nadel, L., Keightly, S., and Kell, D., 1975, Fornix lesions selectively abolish place learning in the rat, Ex1. Neurol., 48: 152.
O’Keefe, J., Nadel, L., and Willner, J., 1979, Tuning out irrelevance? Comments on Solomon’s temporal mapping view of the hippocampus, Psychol. Bull., 86: 1280.
Olton, D. S., Branch, M., and Best, P. J., 1978, Spatial correlates of hippocampal unit activity, Exp. Neurol., 58: 387.
Olton, D. S., and Samuelson, R. J., 1976, Remembrance of places plased: Spatial memory in rats, J. Exp. Psych.: Animal Behay. Processes, 2: 97.
Olton, D. S., Walker, J. A., and Gage, F. H., 1978, Hippocampal connections and spatial discrimination, Brain Res., 139: 295.
Pavlov, J., 1927, “Conditioned Reflexes,” Oxford University Press,London.
Rescorla, R. A., and Wagner, A. R., 1972, A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement, in: “Classical Conditioning II: Current Research and Theory,” A. H. Black and W. F. Prokasy, eds., Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York.
Restle, F., 1957, Discrimination of cues in mazes: a resolution of the place vs response question, Psychol. Rev., 64: 217.
Solomon, P. R., 1979, Temporal versus spatial information processing theories of hippocampal function, Psychol. Bull., 86: 1272.
Tolman, E. C., 1932, “Purposive Behavior in Animals and Men,” Century, New York.
Van Hoesen, G. W., and Pandya, D. N., 1975, Some connections of the entorhinal (area 28) and peripheral (area 35) cortices of the rhesus monkey, Brain Res., 95: 1.
Vernier, V. G., and Alleva, F. R., 1968, The bioassay of kanamycin auditory toxicity, Archives Internationales de Pharmacodynamie, 176: 59.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1982 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Best, P.J., Hill, A.J. (1982). Visual and Auditory Cues Support Place Field Activity of Hippocampal Units in the Rat. In: Woody, C.D. (eds) Conditioning. Advances in Behavioral Biology, vol 26. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-0701-4_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-0701-4_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-0703-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-0701-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive