Skip to main content

Holographic Adaptive Processing — A Comparison with LMS Adaptive Processing

  • Chapter
Acoustical Holography

Abstract

A holographic adaptive processing technique which is an advanced version of one described earlier,1,2 has bein applied to a passive underwater acoustics scenario used by Frost3 to test the well-known “Constrained Least-Mean-Squares (LMS) Algorithm” for adaptive array processing. This application allows the holographic approach to be functionally compared with the LMS approach. Results are presented which show that the holographic technique works better on the Frost Scenario (consisting of partly coherent signal, interferences, and white noise) than the LMS technique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. R.F. Steinberg, P. N. Keating, and R. F. Koppelmann,”Acoustical Holography”. Vol. 6, Ed. By N. Booth, 539. ( Plenum Press, New York, 1976 )

    Google Scholar 

  2. P. N. Keating, R. F. Koppelmann, R. K. Mueller, and R.F. Steinberg, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 59, 106 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  3. L. Frost, Proc. IEEE 60, 926, (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. N. L. Owersley,“Signal Processing’’, Proc. of the NATO Advanced Study Institute on Signal Processing with Particular Reference to Underwater Acoustics, Loughborough, England, 1973, Ed. By J W. R. Griffithes, et al; 591, (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  5. H. Cox, J. Acoust.Soc. Am., 54, 3, 771 (1973).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. W. F. Gabriel, IEEE 64, 239, (1976).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. B. Widrow, J. R. Glover, Jr., S. M. McCcol, J. Kaunitz, C. S. Williams, C. H. Hearns, J. R. Zeider, E. Dong, Goodlin, IEEE 63, 1692 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. V. C. Anderson, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 45, 2, 398, (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. K. Mueller, R. R. Gupta, and P. N. Keating, J. Appl. Phys., 43, 457 (1972).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. P. N. Keating, R. R. Gupta, and R. K. Mueller, J. Appl. Phys., 43, 1198 (1972); also in “Acoustical Holography”, Ed. by Glen Wade, 4, 251, ( Plenum, New York, 1972 ).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Extensive bibliography will be found, for example, in H. L. Van Trees, “Detection, Estimation, and Modulation Theory”, Parts I and III, John Wiley and Sons, New York (1971).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1977 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Keating, P.N., Sawatari, T. (1977). Holographic Adaptive Processing — A Comparison with LMS Adaptive Processing. In: Kessler, L.W. (eds) Acoustical Holography. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-0653-6_36

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-0653-6_36

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-0655-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-0653-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics