Skip to main content

The Evaluative Framework for Workplace Spirituality Assessments: Working Our Strengths and Strengthening Our Work

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Faith and Spirituality in the Workplace

Abstract

In this chapter, we develop and pilot-test a framework with which we evaluate workplace spirituality assessments (WSAs). WSAs are used empirically to measure some aspect of workplace spirituality. Building upon Gardner’s work on multiple intelligences and previous reviews of the workplace spirituality literature, we develop a framework with four different evaluative filters. First, we determine which approach to workplace spirituality the WSA concerns, including metaphysical transcendence, existential meaning-making, or religio-spiritual. Next, we assess which foundation of spiritual intelligence is considered, be it computational, empirical, operational, or teleological. Then, we consider whether the WSA is contextualized by cultural bounds and if the WSA considers workplace spirituality critically. Last, we argue that WSAs should be held to the standard of rigor, relevance, and reciprocality. The evaluative framework allows for study- and field-level reflection on the state of WSAs and directs our attention to potential areas of focus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Wigglesworth’s chapter “Spiritual Intelligence” (this volume) is an exception to this distinction. Her work applies spiritual intelligence to leadership and business, so is better included throughout this chapter as a WSA.

  2. 2.

    As social intelligence is an outgrowth of emotional intelligence, we include it here, although it is not in Wigglesworth’s model.

  3. 3.

    Tirri et al. (2006) nicely operationalize Gardner’s multiple intelligence model with spiritual intelligence into the Multiple Intelligence Profile Questionnaire (MIPQ).

  4. 4.

    While substantiating such a claim is difficult, Gardner’s work has remained the intellectual centerpiece of most academic inquiry and debate related to intelligence. That Gardner’s work on multiple intelligences has been seriously challenged (Schaler and Gardner 2006 (Gardner’s responses to his critics are also included); Morris 2012) is testimony to his gravity as the central figure in this domain.

  5. 5.

    See Schaler and Gardner (2006, p. 20) for a more contemporary response from Gardner against the possibility of a spiritual intelligence.

  6. 6.

    To note, the teleological foundation of intelligence in the framework is conceptually distinct from our extension of CWPS here. Moreover, CWPS differentiates the lens of cultural analysis from general culture to corporate culture analysis—uncovering the “dark side.” The teleological considers a positive valence and greater purpose in WSAs. Critically focusing on WSAs helps determine to what extent the WSA is actually being teleological. For example, a WSA may claim to measure truly enlightening and transformative dimensions of spirit. However, in its theory and/or application, the WSA may be critically interpreted to fall short of it stated purpose. It may be an assessment that does not actually tap into psycho-spiritual aspects and serves as a manipulative tool of management. This critical filter for WSAs affords an invaluable opportunity to uncover possible unstated assumptions and ideological biases that may undermine the ultimately liberating agenda of spirituality at work and its measurement.

  7. 7.

    The Management, Spirituality, and Religion (MSR) Interest Group of the Academy of Management (AOM) focuses on interdisciplinary theoretical and applied research and pedagogy related to the relevance and relationship of spirituality and religion in management and organizational life.

References

  • Altaf, A., & Awan, M. (2011). Moderating Affect of Workplace Spirituality on the Relationship of Job Overload and Job Satisfaction. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(1), 93–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amram, Y., & Dryer, C. (2008). The Integrated Spiritual Intelligence Scale (ISIS): Development and preliminary validation. Proceedings from Annual Conference of the American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashmos, D. P., & Duchon, D. (2000). Spirituality at work: A conceptualization and measure. Journal of Management Inquiry, 9(2), 134–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, R. (2009). What’s right and wrong with spirituality in the workplace. Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion, 6(3), 261–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biberman, J., & Tischler, L. (2008). Spirituality in business: theory, practice, and future directions. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braud, W. (2009). Dragons, spheres, and flashlights: appropriate research approaches for studying workplace spirituality. Journal of Management, Spirituality and Religion, 6(1), 59–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Case, P., Eriksen, M., Mills, A. J., & Hope, A. (2012). Editorial Introduction. Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion, 9(1), 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, X.-P., Liu, D., & Portnoy, R. (2012). A multilevel investigation of motivational cultural intelligence, organizational diversity climate, and cultural sales: Evidence from U.S. real estate firms. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(1), 93–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cianciolo, A. T., & Sternberg, R. J. (2004). Intelligence: a brief history (Blackwell brief histories of psychology). Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comer, D., & Vega, G. (2011). The relationship between the Personal Ethical Threshold and workplace spirituality. Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion, 8(1), 23–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, D. A. (2005). Translating spiritual intelligence into leadership competencies. Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion, 2(1), 3–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dean, K. L., & Fornaciari, C. J. (2007). Empirical research in management, spirituality & religion during its founding years. Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion, 4(1), 3–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dean, K. L., & Safranski, S. R. (2008). No Harm, No Foul? Organizational Intervention in Workplace Spirituality. International Journal of Public Administration, 31(4), 359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, A. C. (2003). Response to the spiritual intelligence debate: are some conceptual distinctions needed here? The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 13(1), 49–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emmons, R. A. (2000a). Is spirituality an intelligence? motivation, cognition, and the psychology of ultimate concern. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 10(1), 3–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emmons, R. A. (2000b). Spirituality and intelligence: problems and prospects. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 10(1), 57–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emmons, R. A. (1999). The psychology of ultimate concerns: motivation and spirituality in personality. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fornaciari, C. J., & Lund Dean, K. (2004). Diapers to car keys: The state of spirituality, religion and work research. Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion, 1(1), 7–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornaciari, C. J., & Lund Dean, K. (2009). Foundations, lessons, and insider tips for MSR research. Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion, 6(4), 301–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornaciari, C. J., Sherlock, J. J., Ritchie, W. J., & Dean, K. L. (2005). Scale development practices in the measurement of spirituality. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 13(1), 28–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fry, L. W., Vitucci, S., & Cedillo, M. (2005). Spiritual leadership and army transformation: theory, measurement, and establishing a baseline. Leadership Quarterly Leadership Quarterly, 16(5), 835–862.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (2000). A case against spiritual intelligence. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 10(1), 27–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1998). Are there additional intelligences? the case for naturalist, spiritual, and existential intelligences. In J. Kane (Ed.), Education, information, and transformation (pp. 111–131). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill-Prentice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence reframed: multiple intelligences for the 21st century. New York, NY: Basic Books. Retrieved from

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (2006). Multiple intelligences: new horizons (Completely rev. and updated. ed.). New York: BasicBooks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geh, E., & Tan, G. (2009). Spirituality at work in a changing world: managerial and research implications. Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion, 6(4), 287–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giacalone, R. A., Jurkiewicz, C.L., and Fry, L.W. 2005. From advocacy to science: The next steps in workplace spirituality research. In: R. Paloutzian, ed. Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 515–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giacalone, R. A., & Jurkiewicz, C. L. (2010). Handbook of workplace spirituality and organizational performance (2nd ed.). Armonk, N.Y.: M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goleman, D. (2005). Emotional intelligence. New York: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goleman, D. (2006). Social intelligence: the new science of human relationships. New York: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman, W. (1998). Global mind change: The promise of the 21st century. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harung, H., Travis, F., Blank, W., & Heaton, D. (2009). Higher development, brain integration, and excellence in leadership. Management Decision, 47(6), 872–894.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heaton, D. P., Schmidt-Wilk, J., & Travis, F. (2004). Constructs, methods, and measures for researching spirituality in organizations. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 17(1), 62–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinkin, T. R. (1995). A Review of Scale Development Practices in the Study of Organizations. Journal of Management Journal of Management, 21(5), 967–988.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, M. S. L. (2011). The interactive effects of spirituality and trait cynicism on citizenship and counterproductive work behaviors. Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion, 8(2), 165–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, D., & DeCicco, T. (2009). A viable model and self-report measure of spiritual intelligence. International Journal of Transpersonal Studies, 28, 68–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd enl. ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lips-Wiersma, M., Dean, K. L., & Fornaciari, C. J. (2009). Theorizing the dark side of the workplace spirituality movement. Journal of Management Inquiry, 18(4), 288–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovejoy, A. O. (1936). The great chain of being: a study of the history of an idea. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lund Dean, K., Fornaciari, C. J., & McGee, J. J. (2003). Research in spirituality, religion, and work: walking the line between relevance and legitimacy. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 16(4), 378–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, M. L., Naughton, M. J., & VanderVeen, S. (2009). Faith at Work Scale (FWS): Justification, Development, and Validation of a Measure of Judaeo-Christian Religion in the Workplace. Journal of Business Ethics, Journal of Business Ethics 85(2), 227–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, M. L., Naughton, M. J., & VanderVeen, S. (2011). Connecting religion and work: Patterns and influences of work-faith integration. Human Relations, 64(5), 27, 675–701.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald, D. A. (2000). Spirituality: description, measurement relation to the five factor model of personality. Journal of Personality, 68(1), 153–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Management, spirituality, & religion (home page). Retrieved May 8, 2012 from http://group.aomonline.org/msr/

  • Smith, M. K. (2008a). Howard Gardner, multiple intelligences and education. Retrieved May 1, 2012 from http://www.infed.org/thinkers/gardner.htm

  • Martin, T. N., & Hafer, J. C. (2009). Models of emotional intelligence, spiritual intelligence, and performance: a test of Tischler, Biberman, and McKeage. Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion, 6(3), 247–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (2007). Economic and philosophic manuscripts of 1844 (Dover ed.). Mineola, N.Y.: Dover Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matheny, J. (2005). The visibility of expressing spirituality and religion at work: Introduction to the Special Issue. Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion, 2(2), 166–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, J. D. (2000). Spiritual intelligence or spiritual consciousness? The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 10(1), 47–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McTaggart, L. (2002). The field: the quest for the secret force of the universe (1st ed.). New York, NY: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitroff, I. I., Denton, E. A., & Alpaslan, C. M. (2009). A spiritual audit of corporate America: ten years later (spirituality and attachment theory, an interim report). Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion, 6(1), 27–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, T. W., & Casper, W. J. (2006). An examination of proxy measures of workplace spirituality: A profile model of multidimensional constructs. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 12(4), 109–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, C. (2012). Various critiques by intelligence theorists who question Howard Earl Gardner’s (HEG) Multiple Intelligences Theory (MIT). Retrieved May 1, 2012 from http://www.igs.net/~cmorris/critiques.html

  • Neal, J. (2006). Edgewalkers: People and organizations that take risks, build bridges and break new ground. Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neal, J. & Hoopes, (2012, August). Assessing qualities and skills of edgewalkers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newberg, A. (2008). Spirituality, the brain, and health. In T. Simon (Ed.), Measuring the immeasurable: the scientific case for spirituality (pp. 349–371). Boulder, Colorado: Sounds True.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oswick, C. (2009). Burgeoning workplace spirituality? A textual analysis of momentum and directions. Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion, 6(1), 15–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paloutzian, R., Emmons, R. A., & Keortge, S. (2003). Spiritual well-being, spiritual intelligence, and healthy workplace policy. In R. A. Giacalone, & C. L. Jurkiewicz (Eds.), Handbook of spirituality and organizational performance (pp. 73–86). New York: M. E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauchant, T. (2004). Integrating Spirituality at Work: An Interview with Ken Wilber. Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion, 1(1), 113–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulson, D. S., & Wilber, K. (2002). Competitive business, caring business: an integral business perspective for the 21st century. New York: Paraview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prati, L. M., Liu, Y., & Bass, K. (2007). Religiosity and Workplace Behavior: A Manifestation of Emotional Intelligence. Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion, 4(2), 138–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quddus, M., III, H. B., & White, L. (2009). Business ethics: perspectives from Judaic, Christian, and Islamic scriptures. Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion, 6(4), 323–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, R. (2012). Contemplation and the ‘Performative Absolute’: submission and identity in managerial modernity. Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion, 9(1), 9–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rockstuhl, T., Seiler, S., Ang, S., Van, D., Linn, & Annen, H. (2011). Beyond general intelligence (IQ) and emotional intelligence (EQ): The role of cultural intelligence (CQ) on cross‚Äêborder leadership effectiveness in a globalized world. Journal of Social Issues, 67(4), 825–840.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saks, A. (2011). Workplace spirituality and employee engagement. Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion, 8(4), 317–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaler, J. A., & Gardner, H. (2006). Howard Gardner under fire: the rebel psychologist faces his critics (The under fire series; v. 2). Chicago: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. E. P. (2011). Flourish: a visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being (1st Free Press hardcover ed.). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, T. (Ed.). (2008). Measuring the immeasurable: the scientific case for spirituality. Boulder, Colorado: Sounds True.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (2008b). The Neuroscience of Spiritual Experience in Organizations. Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion, 5(1), 3–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanczak, G.C. and Miller, D.E. (2002). Engaged spirituality: spirituality and social transformation in mainstream American religious traditions: Report supplement. Los Angeles: The University of Southern California Center for Religion and Civic Culture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steingard, D. S. (2005). Spiritually informed management theory: toward profound possibilities for inquiry and transformation. Journal of Management Inquiry, 14(3), 227–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steingard, D. S. (2008). Intentional Intelligence: how the new mind of leadership manifests success in business and life. In J. Biberman, & L. Tischler (Eds.), Spirituality in Business: Theory, Practice, and Future Directions (pp. 89–105). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steingard, D. S., & Dufresne, R. (2011). Intentional Intelligence and the Intentional Intelligence Quotient (IIQ): Construct development and scale validation integrating mindfulness, self-agency, and positive thought flow. Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tirri, K., Nokelainen, P., & Ubani, M. (2006). Conceptual definition and empirical validation of the spiritual sensitivity scale. Journal of Empirical Theology, 19(1), 37–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tischler, L., Biberman, J., & McKeage, R. (2002). Linking emotional intelligence, spirituality and workplace performance: definitions, models and ideas for research. Journal of Management Psychology, 17(3), 203–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Travis, F.T., Arenander, A., DuBois, D. (2004). Psychological and physiological characteristics of a proposed object-referral/self-referral continuum of self-awareness. Consciousness and Cognition 13(2), 401–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsui, A. S. (2010). Retrieved May 1, 2012 from http://program.aomonline.org/2010/pdf/AOM_2010_Theme_Magazine.pdf

  • Vaughan, F. (2002). What is spiritual intelligence? Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 42(2), 16–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilber, K. (1996). A brief history of everything (1st ed.). Boston: Shambhala.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilber, K. (1999). The marriage of sense and soul: integrating science and religion (1st. Broadway Books trade pbk. ed.). New York: Broadway Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilber, K. (2006). Integral spirituality: a startling new role for religion in the modern and postmodern world (1st ed.). Boston: Integral Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zohar, D. (1997). Rewiring the corporate brain: using the new science to rethink how we structure and lead organizations (1st ed.). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers. Retrieved from http://lcweb.loc.gov/catdir/toc/97033499.html

  • Zohar, D., & Marshall, I. N. (2000). SQ: spiritual intelligence, the ultimate intelligence. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zohar, D., & Marshall, I. N. (2004). Spiritual capital: wealth we can live by (1st ed.). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David S. Steingard .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Steingard, D.S., Dufresne, R.L. (2013). The Evaluative Framework for Workplace Spirituality Assessments: Working Our Strengths and Strengthening Our Work. In: Neal, J. (eds) Handbook of Faith and Spirituality in the Workplace. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5233-1_28

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics