Skip to main content

Introduction to Emerging Technologies for the Classroom: A Learning Sciences Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Emerging Technologies for the Classroom

Abstract

This chapter provides a historical overview of the role of technology in schools and describes strategies used to address technological innovations in school settings. Four types of emerging technologies are then introduced: (a) technologies that support learning to understand and create; (b) technologies that support learning by collaborating; (c) technologies that support anytime, anyplace learning; and (d) technologies that support learning by gaming. A summary of each chapter presented in this volume is also provided. The chapter concludes with thoughts on future directions of emerging technologies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Brown, J. S. (2009). Foreword. In A. Collins & R. Halverson (Eds.), Rethinking education in the age of technology: The digital revolution and schooling in America (pp. 9–10). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bull, G., & Garofalo, J. (2009). Personal fabrication systems: From bits to atoms. Learning & Leading with Technology, 36(7). Retrieved from http://www.learningandleading-digital.com/learning_leading/200905/?pg=12 retrieved August 6, 2012

  • Collins, A., & Halverson, R. (2009). Rethinking education in the age of technology: The digital revolution and schooling in America. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuban, L. (1986). Teachers and machines: Classroom use of technology since 1920s. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Druin, A. (2009). Mobile technology for learning: Designing for interaction and learning. Burlington, MA: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelson, D. C., & Reiser, B. J. (2006). Making authentic practices accessible to learners: Design challenges and strategies. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 335–354). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greeno, J. G. (2006). Learning in activity. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 79–96). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki, Finland: Orienta-Konsultit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagel, J., & Brown, J. S. (2005). The only sustainable edge: Why business strategy depends on productive friction and dynamic specialization. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halverson, R., & Smith, A. (2010). How new technologies have (and have not) changed teaching and learning in schools. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 26, 49–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ito, M., Horst, H., Bittanti, M., boyd, D., Herr-Stephenson, B., Lange, P., & Tripp, L. (2008). Living and learning with new media: Summary of findings from the digital youth project (The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Reports on Digital Media and Learning). Chicago, IL: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konold, C., & Kazak, S. (2008). Reconnecting data and chance. Technology Innovations in Statistics Education, 2(1). Retrieved from http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/38p7c94v retrieved August 6, 2012

  • Krajcik, J., & Blumenfeld, P. (2006). Project-based learning. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 317–334). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lantz-Andersson, A., Linderoth, J., & Säljö, R. (2009). What’s the problem? Meaning making and learning to do mathematical word problems in the context of digital tools. Instructional Science, 37, 325–343. doi:10.1007/s11251-008-9050-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Means, B. (2010). Technology and education change: Focus on student learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 285–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oblinger, D. (2006). Games and learning: Digital games have the potential to bring play back to the learning experience. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 29(3), 5–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papert, S. (1993). The children’s machine: rethinking school in the age of the computer. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pea, R. (1993). Practices of distributed intelligence and designs for education. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 47–87). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pea, R. (Ed.) (2000). Introduction. In The Jossey-Bass reader on technology and learning (pp. xv–xxiv). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roschelle, J., Knudsen, J., & Hegedus, S. (2010). From new technological infrastructures to curricular activity systems: Advanced designs for teaching and learning. In M. J. Jacobson & P. Reimann (Eds.), Designs for learning environments of the future: International perspectives from the Learning Sciences (pp. 233–262). New York, NY: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, K. (2006). Introduction: The new science of learning. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 1–18). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, D. W., Squire, K., Halverson, R., & Gee, J. P. (2005). Video games and the future of learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 87, 104–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shuler, C. (2009). Pockets of potential: Using mobile technologies to promote children’s learning. New York, NY: The Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Workshop.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, M., & Brown, J. S. (2011). A new culture of learning: Cultivating the imagination for a world of constant change. Lexington, KY: CreateSpace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Eck, R. (2006). Digital game-based learning: It’s not just the digital natives who are restless. EDUCAUSE Review, 41(2), 16–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vavoula, G., Sharples, M., Lonsdale, P., Rudman, P., & Meek, J. (2007). Learning bridges: Mobile technologies in education. Educational Technology, 47(3), 33–37.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chrystalla Mouza .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mouza, C., Lavigne, N.C. (2013). Introduction to Emerging Technologies for the Classroom: A Learning Sciences Perspective. In: Mouza, C., Lavigne, N. (eds) Emerging Technologies for the Classroom. Explorations in the Learning Sciences, Instructional Systems and Performance Technologies. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4696-5_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics