Skip to main content

The Capability-Related and Network-Related Causes for Innovation Failure and Success

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Innovation Systems in Small Catching-Up Economies

Part of the book series: Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management ((ITKM,volume 15))

  • 939 Accesses

Abstract

Innovations are often associated with substantial risks and failure is not rare. It is, therefore, important to study what causes innovation failure, how to reduce the risk of failing and how to increase the chance of innovation success. The paper aims to study how network relationships (or the lack of them) and (the lack of) capabilities lead to innovation failure or success in Estonian firms. Based on survey results from 95 firms and the evidence from 48 interviews, it concludes that the lack of capabilities and network relationships may lead to innovation failure. Network relationships may also constrain innovation: for example, if foreign owners do not allow a firm to do (substantial) R&D because its main role is production or if a company’s customers or subcontractors are not interested in innovative products or solutions. For this reason, firms should pay more attention to participating in those networks that could advance their innovative capabilities and increase the success of their innovation efforts. At the same time, they should take into account that participating in networks does not automatically guarantee success: some relationships or their dissolution may also lead to innovation failure. Consequently, partners should be selected very carefully.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Achrol, R. S. (1997). Changes in the theory of interorganizational relations in marketing: Toward a network paradigm. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25(1), 56–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alajoutsijärvi, K, Möller, K., Tähtinen, J. (2000). Beautiful exit: How to leave your business partner. European Journal of Marketing, 34(11/12), 1270–1289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, U., & Forsgren, M. (2000). In search of centre of excellence: network embeddedness and subsidiary roles in multinational corporations. Management International Review, 40(4), 329–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, U., Forsgren, M., Holm, U. (2002). The strategic impact of external networks: Subsidiary performance and competence development in the multinational corporation. Strategic Management Journal, 23(11), 979–996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Athaide, G. A., & Klink, R. R. (2009). Managing seller–buyer relationships during new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26(5), 566–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S., & Fai, F. (2006). Strategic resonance between technological and organisational capabilities in the innovation process within firms. Technovation, 26(1), 60–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A. J. & Cooper, R. G. (1999). Do customer partnerships improve new product success rates? Industrial Marketing Management, 28(5), 507–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dilk, C., Gleich, R., Wald, A., Motwani, J. (2008). Innovation networks in the automotive industry: an empirical study in Germany. International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management, 8(3), 317–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, R. F., Schurr, P. H., Oh, S. (1987). Developing buyer-seller relationships. Journal of Marketing, 51(2), 11–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forsgren, M., & Johanson, J. (1992). Managing internationalization in business networks. In M. Forsgren, & J. Johanson (Eds.), Managing networks in international business (pp.1–15). Philadelphia, PA: Gordon and Breach.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortuin, F. T. J. M., Batterink, M. H., Omta, S. W. F. (2007). Key success factors of innovation in multinational agrifood prospector companies. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 10(4), 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freel, M. S. (2000). Barriers to product innovation in small manufacturing firms. International Small Business Journal, 18(2), 60–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gadde, L.-E., & Håkansson, H. (2001). Supply network strategies. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gemünden, H. G., Heydebreck, P., Herden, R. (1992). Technological interweavement: A means of achieving innovation success. R&D Management, 22(4), 359–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R. (1996). Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organization Science, 7(4), 375–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Håkansson, H., & Snehota, I. (1989). No business is an island: The network concept of business strategy. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 4(3), 187–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Håkansson, H. & Snehota, I. (2000). The IMP perspective: Assets and liabilities of business relationships. In J. N. Sheth, & A. Parvatiyar (Eds.), Handbook of relationship marketing (pp. 69–94). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helfat, C. E., Finkelstein, S., Mitchell, W., Peteraf, M. A., Singh, H., Teece, D. J., Winter, S. G. (2007). Dynamic capabilities: Understanding strategic change in organizations. London: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann, A., Gassmann, O., Eisert, U. (2007). An empirical study of the antecedents for radical product innovations and capabilities for transformation. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 24(1/2), 92–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hertzfeld, H. R., Link, A. N., Vonortas, N. S. (2006). Intellectual property protection mechanisms in research partnerships. Research Policy, 35(6), 825–838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hussler, C., & Rondé, P. (2009). Investing in networking competences or establishing in hot spots? the innovation dilemma. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 4(4), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, O., & Stevens, G. (1999). Evaluating failure in the innovation process: The micropolitics of new product development. R&D Management, 29(2), 167–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kale, P., Dyer, J. H., Singh, H.(2002). Alliance capability, stock market response, and long term alliance success: The role of alliance function. Strategic Management Journal, 23(8), 747–767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, K. J., & Sorra, J. S. (1996). The challenge of innovation implementation. The Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1055–1080.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, A. (1980). Why innovation fails. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewrick, M. (2009). Introduction of an evaluation tool to predict the probability of success of companies: The Innovativeness, Capabilities and Potential Model (ICP). Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 4(1), 33–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lhuillery, S., & Pfister, E. (2009). R&D cooperation and failures in innovation projects: Empirical evidence from French CIS data. Research Policy, 38(1), 45–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, S. (2003). The evaluation of strategic research partnerships. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 15(2), 159–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 20–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavitt, K. (1998). Technologies, products and organization in the innovating firm: What Adam Smith tells us and Joseph Schumpeter doesn’t. Industrial and Corporate Change, 7(3), 433–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, R., & Papanastassiou, M. (2009). Subsidiaries, innovation and the strategic development of multinationals. In M. Papanastassiou, & R. Pearce (Eds.), The strategic development of multinationals (pp. 1–20). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pressey, A. D., & Mathews, B. P. (2003). Jumped, pushed or forgotten? Approaches to dissolution. Journal of Marketing Management, 19(1/2), 131–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rammer, C., Czarnitzki, D., Spielkamp, A. (2009). Innovation success of non-R&D-performers: Substituting technology by management in SMEs. Small Business Economics, 33(1), 35–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reuer, J. J., & Zollo, M. (2005). Termination outcomes of research alliances. Research Policy, 34(1), 101–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ring, P. S., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1994). Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships. Academy of Management Review, 19(1), 90–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, T., & Gemünden, H. G. (2003). Network competence: Its impact on innovation success and its antecedents. Journal of Business Research, 56(9), 745–755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Service, R. W., & Boockholdt, J. L. (1998). Factors leading to innovation: A study of managers’ perspectives. Creativity Research Journal, 11(4), 295–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorescu, A. B., Chandy, R. K., & Prabhu, J. C. (2003). Sources and financial consequences of radical innovation: Insights from pharmaceuticals. Journal of Marketing, 67(4), 82–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Panne, G., der Beers, C., Kleinknecht, A. (2003), Success and failure of innovation: A literature review. International Journal of Innovation Management, 7(3), 309–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Riel, A. C. R., Lemmink, J, Ouwersloot, H. (2004). High-technology service innovation success: A decision-making perspective. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 21(5), 348–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Välikangas, L., Hoegl, M. Gibbert, M. (2009). Why learning from failure isn’t easy (and what to do about it): Innovation trauma at Sun Microsystems. European Management Journal, 27(4), 225–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research was financed by the Estonian Science Foundation’s Grants No. 7405 and 8546 and target financing of the Estonian Ministry of Education and Research No. 0180037s08.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tiia Vissak .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Vissak, T. (2012). The Capability-Related and Network-Related Causes for Innovation Failure and Success. In: Carayannis, E., Varblane, U., Roolaht, T. (eds) Innovation Systems in Small Catching-Up Economies. Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management, vol 15. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1548-0_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics