Abstract
Innovations are often associated with substantial risks and failure is not rare. It is, therefore, important to study what causes innovation failure, how to reduce the risk of failing and how to increase the chance of innovation success. The paper aims to study how network relationships (or the lack of them) and (the lack of) capabilities lead to innovation failure or success in Estonian firms. Based on survey results from 95 firms and the evidence from 48 interviews, it concludes that the lack of capabilities and network relationships may lead to innovation failure. Network relationships may also constrain innovation: for example, if foreign owners do not allow a firm to do (substantial) R&D because its main role is production or if a company’s customers or subcontractors are not interested in innovative products or solutions. For this reason, firms should pay more attention to participating in those networks that could advance their innovative capabilities and increase the success of their innovation efforts. At the same time, they should take into account that participating in networks does not automatically guarantee success: some relationships or their dissolution may also lead to innovation failure. Consequently, partners should be selected very carefully.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Achrol, R. S. (1997). Changes in the theory of interorganizational relations in marketing: Toward a network paradigm. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25(1), 56–71.
Alajoutsijärvi, K, Möller, K., Tähtinen, J. (2000). Beautiful exit: How to leave your business partner. European Journal of Marketing, 34(11/12), 1270–1289.
Andersson, U., & Forsgren, M. (2000). In search of centre of excellence: network embeddedness and subsidiary roles in multinational corporations. Management International Review, 40(4), 329–350.
Andersson, U., Forsgren, M., Holm, U. (2002). The strategic impact of external networks: Subsidiary performance and competence development in the multinational corporation. Strategic Management Journal, 23(11), 979–996.
Athaide, G. A., & Klink, R. R. (2009). Managing seller–buyer relationships during new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26(5), 566–577.
Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.
Brown, S., & Fai, F. (2006). Strategic resonance between technological and organisational capabilities in the innovation process within firms. Technovation, 26(1), 60–75.
Campbell, A. J. & Cooper, R. G. (1999). Do customer partnerships improve new product success rates? Industrial Marketing Management, 28(5), 507–519.
Dilk, C., Gleich, R., Wald, A., Motwani, J. (2008). Innovation networks in the automotive industry: an empirical study in Germany. International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management, 8(3), 317–330.
Dwyer, R. F., Schurr, P. H., Oh, S. (1987). Developing buyer-seller relationships. Journal of Marketing, 51(2), 11–27.
Forsgren, M., & Johanson, J. (1992). Managing internationalization in business networks. In M. Forsgren, & J. Johanson (Eds.), Managing networks in international business (pp.1–15). Philadelphia, PA: Gordon and Breach.
Fortuin, F. T. J. M., Batterink, M. H., Omta, S. W. F. (2007). Key success factors of innovation in multinational agrifood prospector companies. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 10(4), 1–24.
Freel, M. S. (2000). Barriers to product innovation in small manufacturing firms. International Small Business Journal, 18(2), 60–80.
Gadde, L.-E., & Håkansson, H. (2001). Supply network strategies. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
Gemünden, H. G., Heydebreck, P., Herden, R. (1992). Technological interweavement: A means of achieving innovation success. R&D Management, 22(4), 359–376.
Grant, R. (1996). Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organization Science, 7(4), 375–387.
Håkansson, H., & Snehota, I. (1989). No business is an island: The network concept of business strategy. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 4(3), 187–200.
Håkansson, H. & Snehota, I. (2000). The IMP perspective: Assets and liabilities of business relationships. In J. N. Sheth, & A. Parvatiyar (Eds.), Handbook of relationship marketing (pp. 69–94). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Helfat, C. E., Finkelstein, S., Mitchell, W., Peteraf, M. A., Singh, H., Teece, D. J., Winter, S. G. (2007). Dynamic capabilities: Understanding strategic change in organizations. London: Blackwell.
Herrmann, A., Gassmann, O., Eisert, U. (2007). An empirical study of the antecedents for radical product innovations and capabilities for transformation. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 24(1/2), 92–120.
Hertzfeld, H. R., Link, A. N., Vonortas, N. S. (2006). Intellectual property protection mechanisms in research partnerships. Research Policy, 35(6), 825–838.
Hussler, C., & Rondé, P. (2009). Investing in networking competences or establishing in hot spots? the innovation dilemma. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 4(4), 1–13.
Jones, O., & Stevens, G. (1999). Evaluating failure in the innovation process: The micropolitics of new product development. R&D Management, 29(2), 167–178.
Kale, P., Dyer, J. H., Singh, H.(2002). Alliance capability, stock market response, and long term alliance success: The role of alliance function. Strategic Management Journal, 23(8), 747–767.
Klein, K. J., & Sorra, J. S. (1996). The challenge of innovation implementation. The Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1055–1080.
Levine, A. (1980). Why innovation fails. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Lewrick, M. (2009). Introduction of an evaluation tool to predict the probability of success of companies: The Innovativeness, Capabilities and Potential Model (ICP). Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 4(1), 33–47.
Lhuillery, S., & Pfister, E. (2009). R&D cooperation and failures in innovation projects: Empirical evidence from French CIS data. Research Policy, 38(1), 45–57.
Martin, S. (2003). The evaluation of strategic research partnerships. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 15(2), 159–176.
Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 20–38.
Pavitt, K. (1998). Technologies, products and organization in the innovating firm: What Adam Smith tells us and Joseph Schumpeter doesn’t. Industrial and Corporate Change, 7(3), 433–452.
Pearce, R., & Papanastassiou, M. (2009). Subsidiaries, innovation and the strategic development of multinationals. In M. Papanastassiou, & R. Pearce (Eds.), The strategic development of multinationals (pp. 1–20). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
Pressey, A. D., & Mathews, B. P. (2003). Jumped, pushed or forgotten? Approaches to dissolution. Journal of Marketing Management, 19(1/2), 131–155.
Rammer, C., Czarnitzki, D., Spielkamp, A. (2009). Innovation success of non-R&D-performers: Substituting technology by management in SMEs. Small Business Economics, 33(1), 35–58.
Reuer, J. J., & Zollo, M. (2005). Termination outcomes of research alliances. Research Policy, 34(1), 101–115.
Ring, P. S., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1994). Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships. Academy of Management Review, 19(1), 90–118.
Ritter, T., & Gemünden, H. G. (2003). Network competence: Its impact on innovation success and its antecedents. Journal of Business Research, 56(9), 745–755.
Service, R. W., & Boockholdt, J. L. (1998). Factors leading to innovation: A study of managers’ perspectives. Creativity Research Journal, 11(4), 295–307.
Sorescu, A. B., Chandy, R. K., & Prabhu, J. C. (2003). Sources and financial consequences of radical innovation: Insights from pharmaceuticals. Journal of Marketing, 67(4), 82–102.
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.
van der Panne, G., der Beers, C., Kleinknecht, A. (2003), Success and failure of innovation: A literature review. International Journal of Innovation Management, 7(3), 309–338.
van Riel, A. C. R., Lemmink, J, Ouwersloot, H. (2004). High-technology service innovation success: A decision-making perspective. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 21(5), 348–359.
Välikangas, L., Hoegl, M. Gibbert, M. (2009). Why learning from failure isn’t easy (and what to do about it): Innovation trauma at Sun Microsystems. European Management Journal, 27(4), 225–233.
Acknowledgments
The research was financed by the Estonian Science Foundation’s Grants No. 7405 and 8546 and target financing of the Estonian Ministry of Education and Research No. 0180037s08.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Vissak, T. (2012). The Capability-Related and Network-Related Causes for Innovation Failure and Success. In: Carayannis, E., Varblane, U., Roolaht, T. (eds) Innovation Systems in Small Catching-Up Economies. Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management, vol 15. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1548-0_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1548-0_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-1547-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-1548-0
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)