Skip to main content
  • 27 Accesses

Abstract

Infertility is still difficult to define -

  • It is a time-related phenomenon

  • The indices used in diagnostic work differ in different places

  • there is no agreement on the cut-off points for key indices

  • the significance of some putative causes of infertility is not certain

  • more than one case of infertility can coexist in a couple

  • there is good evidence that all causes of infertility are not yet known.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. A. L. Southman, What to do with the ‘normal’ infertile couple, Fertil Steril, 11:543 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. A. Collins, Y. So, E. H. Wilson, W. Wrixon and R. F. Casper, Clinical factors affecting pregnancy rates among infertile couples, Can. Med. Assoc. J., 130:269 (1984).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. E. R. Barnea, T. R. Holford and D. R. A. Mclnnes, Long-term prognosis of infertile couples with normal basic investigations: a life-table analysis, Obstet. Gynecol., 66:24 (1985).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. M. J. Haxton and W. P. Black, The aetiology of infertility in 1162 investigated couples, Clin. Exp. Obst. Gyn., XIV:75 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  5. P. R. Koninckx, M. Muyldermans and I. A. Brosens, Unexplained infertility: “Leuven” considerations, Europ. J. Obstet. Gynecol Reprod. Biol, 18:403 (1984).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. R. J. Aitken, F. S. M. Best, P. Warner and A. Templeton, A prospective study of the relationship between semen quality and fertility in cases of unexplained infertility, J. Androl, 5:297 (1984).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. W.H.O. Task Force on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Infertility, Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, Comparative trial of tubal insufflation, hysterosalpingography, and laparoscopy with dye hydrotubation for assessment of tubal patency, Fertil Steril, 46:1101 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. F. Harrison, Pregnancy successes in the infertile couple, Int. J. Fertil., 25:81 (1980).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. A. K. Thomas and M. S. Forrest, A review of 291 infertile couples over eight years, Fertil Steril, 34:106 (1980).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. B. S. Verkauf, The incidence and outcome of single-factor, multifactorial, and unexplained infertility, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 147:175 (1983).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. J. A. Collins, C. A. Rand, E. H. Wilson and W. Wrixon, The better prognosis in secondary infertility is associated with a higher proportion of ovulation disorders, Fertil Steril, 45:611 (1986).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. C. P. West, A. A. Templeton, M. M. Lees, The diagnostic classification and prognosis of 400 infertile couples, Infertility, 5:127 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  13. B. E. Kliger, Evaluation, therapy and outcome in 493 infertile couples, Fertil Steril, 41:40 (1984).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. M. G. R. Hull, C. M. A. Glazener, N. J. Kelly, D. I. Conway, P. A. Foster, R. A. Hinton, C. Coulson, P. A. Lambert, E. M. Watt and K. M. Desai, Population study of causes, treatment and outcome of infertility, Br. Med. J., 291:1693 (1985).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. J. Newton, S. Craig and D. Joyce, The changing pattern of a comprehensive infertility clinic, J. Biosocial Science, 6:477 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. S. J. Behrman and R. W. Kistner, A rational approach to the evaluation of infertility, in: “Progress in Infertility”, S.J. Behrman and R.W. Kistner, eds., Little Brown, Boston (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  17. T. B. Hargreave and R. A. Elton, Fecundability rates from an infertile male population, Br. J. Urol, 31:71 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  18. G. Ragni, G. C. Lombroso, L. De Lauretis, M. D. Olivares, C. Cristiani and P. G. Crosignani, Pregnancy after direct intraperitoneal insemination in severe male infertility resistant to other methods of assisted fertilization, Human Reproduction (in press).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Shlomo Mashiach M.D. Zion Ben-Rafael M.D. Neri Laufer M.D. Joseph G. Schenker M.D.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1990 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Crosignani, P. (1990). Patient Selection for Assisted Procreation. In: Mashiach, S., Ben-Rafael, Z., Laufer, N., Schenker, J.G. (eds) Advances in Assisted Reproductive Technologies. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0645-0_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0645-0_25

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-7907-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-0645-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics