Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

High-Level Factors, Continued

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Human Factors of Stereoscopic 3D Displays

  • 1035 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter covers three high-level factors that are related to stereo display viewing: hand/arm tracking and proprioception, interactive stereo displays and spatial reasoning, and spatial mental models and working memory. These factors are considered ‘high level’ because, like the factors discussed in Chap. 8, they involve cognitive functioning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson, J. R. (2010). Cognitive psychology and its implications. New York: Worth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D. (2003). Working memory: Looking back and looking forward. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 4, 829–839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. J. (1974). Working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 8, pp. 47–89). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D., & Logie, R. H. (1999). Working memory: The multi-component model. In A. Miyake & P. Shah (Eds.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 28–61). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, L. R. (1968). Spatial and verbal components of the act of recall. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 22, 349–368.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Brunye, T. T., & Taylor, H. A. (2008). Working memory in developing and applying mental models from spatial descriptions. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 701–729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, N. (2006). Spatial memory: How egocentric and allocentric combine. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 551–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, R. M. J., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2009). ‘If’ and the problems of conditional reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 282–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conway, A. R. A., Jarrold, C., Kane, M. J., Miyake, A., & Towse, J. N. (2008). Variation in working memory: An introduction. In A. R. A. Conway, C. Jarrold, M. J. Kane, A. Miyake, & J. N. Towse (Eds.), Variation in working memory (pp. 3–20). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cosmides, L., Tooby, J., Fiddick, L., & Bryant, G. A. (2005). Detecting cheaters. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 505–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, N. (1995). Attention and memory: An integrated framework. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, N. (1999). An embedded-process model of working memory. In A. Miyake & P. Shah (Eds.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 62–101). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Diwadkar, V. A., & McNamara, T. P. (1997). Viewpoint dependence in scene recognition. Psychological Science, 8, 302–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1993). Frames of mind: The theory of MI. New York: Basic Books. (Original work published 1983)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazzaniga, M. S., Ivry, R. B., & Mangun, G. R. (2002). Cognitive neuroscience: The biology of the mind. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gernsbacher, M. A. (1985). Surface information loss in comprehension. Cognitive Psychology, 17, 324–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gugerty, L., deBoom, D., Jenkins, J. C., & Morley, R. (2000). Keeping north in mind: How navigators reason about cardinal directions. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 2000 Congress (pp. 1148–1151). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchens, E. L., Hollan, J. D., & Norman, D. A. (1985). Direct manipulation interfaces. Human–Computer Interaction, 1, 311–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2010). Mental models and human reasoning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 18243–18250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Laird, P. N., & Byrne, R. M. J. (2002). Conditionals: A theory of meaning, inference, and pragmatics. Psychological Review, 109, 646–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kandel, E. R., Schwartz, J., & Jessel, T. (2000). Principles of neuroscience. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane, M. J., Conway, A. R. A., Hambrick, D. Z., & Engle, R. W. (2008). Variation in working memory capacity as variation in executive attention and control. In A. R. A. Conway, C. Jarrold, M. J. Kane, A. Miyake, & J. N. Towse (Eds.), Variation in working memory (pp. 21–48). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Keehner, M., Khooshabeh, P., & Hegarty, M. (2008). Interactive visualizations and individual differences among users. In F. Dong, G. Ghinea, & S. Y. Chen (Eds.), User centered design for medical visualization (pp. 1–24). Hershey, PA: Idea Group.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kirsh, D., & Maglio, P. (1994). On distinguishing epistemic from pragmatic action. Cognitive Science, 18, 513–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klatzky, R. L. (1998). Allocentric and egocentric spatial representations: Definitions, distinctions, and interconnections. In Spatial Cognition: Vol. 1404. Lecture notes in computer science (pp. 1–17). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, G., & Hoffman, R. R. (2008). Macrocognition, mental models, and cognitive task analysis methodology. In J. M. Schraagen, L. G. Militello, T. Ormerod, & R. Lipshitz (Eds.), Naturalistic decision making and macrocognition. Hampshire, England: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, C. J., & Nigus, S. G. (2012). Effects of stereopsis, collimation, and head tracking on air refueling boom operator performance. In Proceedings of the Image Society Annual Conference, Scottsdale, AZ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logie, R. H. (1995). Visuo-spatial working memory. Hove, England: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luursema, J.-M., Verwey, W. B., Kommers, P. A. M., & Annema, J.-H. (2008). The role of stereopsis in virtual anatomical learning. Interacting with Computers, 20, 455–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandler, J. M., & Ritchey, G. H. (1977). Long-term memory for pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 3, 386–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merritt, J. O., Cole, R. E., & Ikehara, C. (1991). A rapid-sequential-positioning task for evaluating motion parallax and stereoscopic 3D cues in teleoperator displays. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on systems, man, and cybernetics, October 13–16, University of Virginia, Charlottesville.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyake, A., & Shah, P. (1999). Emerging consensus, unresolved issues, future directions. In A. Miyake & P. Shah (Eds.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 442–482). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Moyer, R. S. (1973). Comparing objects in memory: Evidence suggesting an internal psychophysics. Perception & Psychophysics, 13, 180–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D. A., & Shallice, T. (1986). Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behavior. In R. J. Davidson, G. E. Schwartz, & D. Shapiro (Eds.), Consciousness and selfregulation (Vol. 4, pp. 1–18). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, D. (2009). Human reasoning requires mental logic. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 96–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oaksford, M., & Chater, N. (2001). The probabilistic approach to human reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 349–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Philbeck, J. W., Klatzky, R. L., Behrmann, M., Loomis, J. M., & Goodridge, J. (2001). Active control of locomotion facilitates nonvisual navigation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 141–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragan, E. D., Kopper, R., Schuchardt, P., & Bowman, D. A. (2013). Studying the effects of stereo, head tracking, and field of regard on a small-scale spatial judgment task. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 19(5), 886–896.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renz, J., & Nebel, B. (2007). Qualitative spatial reasoning using constraint calculi. In M. Aiello, I. Pratt-Hartmann, & J. van Benthem (Eds.), Handbook of spatial logics (pp. 1–61). New York: Springer (Ch. 1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Roland, P. E., & Friberg, L. (1985). Localization of cortical areas activated by thinking. Journal of Neurophysiology, 53, 1219–1243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. N., & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171, 701–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, H. A., & Tversky, B. (1992). Spatial mental models derived from survey and route descriptions. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 261–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, W. L., & Kosslyn, S. M. (2000). Neural systems activated during visual mental imagery: A review and meta-analyses. In A. W. Toga & J. C. Mazziotta (Eds.), Brain mapping II: The systems (pp. 535–560). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dayton, OH, USA

    Robert Earl Patterson Ph.D.

Authors
  1. Robert Earl Patterson Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Patterson, R.E. (2015). High-Level Factors, Continued. In: Human Factors of Stereoscopic 3D Displays. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6651-1_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6651-1_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-6650-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-6651-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation