Abstract
Even though in many systems, computers have been programmed to share control with human operators in order to increase task performance, the interaction in such systems is still artificial when compared to natural human-human cooperation. In complex tasks, cooperating human partners may have their own agendas and take initiatives during the task. Such initiatives contribute to a richer interaction between cooperating parties, yet little research exists on how this can be established between a human and a computer. In a cooperation involving haptics, the coupling between the human and the computer should be defined such that the computer can understand the intentions of the human operator and respond accordingly. We believe that this will make the haptic interactions between the human and the computer more natural and human-like. In this regard, we suggest (1) a role exchange mechanism that is activated based on the magnitude of the force applied by the cooperating parties and (2) a negotiation model that enables more human-like coupling between the cooperating parties. We argue that when presented through the haptic channel, the proposed role exchange mechanism and the negotiation model serve to communicate the cooperating parties dynamically, naturally, and seamlessly, in addition to improving the task efficiency of the user. In this chapter, we explore how human-computer cooperation can be improved using a role-exchange mechanism and a haptic negotiation framework. We also discuss the use of haptic negotiation in assigning different behaviors to the computer; and the effectiveness of visual and haptic cues in conveying negotiation-related complex affective states. Throughout this chapter, we will adopt a broad terminology and speak of cooperative systems, in which both parties take some part in control, as shared control schemes, but the term “control” is merely used to address the partners’ manipulation capacities on the task.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
A general categorization of shared haptic interaction, which is similar to Sheridan’s classification, talks about “simultaneous” versus “sequential” haptic manipulation classes [14]. In simultaneous haptic manipulation, both parties can actively control the task concurrently, whereas in sequential manipulation, they take turns in control.
- 2.
41 out of 45 obstacle combinations cause conflicting circumstances.
- 3.
Defection of the human player means that he or she does not accommodate the computer player in keeping the Ball on its path.
- 4.
For the questionnaire design, we adopted the technique that Basdogan [14] used previously in shared virtual environments.
References
Sheridan, T.B.: Telerobotics, Automation, and Human Supervisory Control, p. 393. MIT Press, Cambridge (1992)
O’Malley, M.K., Gupta, A., Gen, M., Li, Y.: Shared control in haptic systems for performance enhancement and training. J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control 128(1), 75–85 (2006). doi:10.1115/1.2168160
Crandall, J.W., Goodrich, M.A.: Experiments in adjustable autonomy. In: IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, vol. 3, pp. 1624–1629 (2001). doi:10.1109/ICSMC.2001.973517
Sierhuis, M., Bradshaw, J.M., Acquisti, A., van Hoof, R., Jeffers, R., Uszok, A.: Human-agent teamwork and adjustable autonomy in practice. In: Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence, Robotics and Automation in Space (I-SAIRAS) (2003)
Nudehi, S.S., Mukherjee, R., Ghodoussi, M.: A shared-control approach to haptic interface design for minimally invasive telesurgical training. IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 13(4), 588–592 (2005). doi:10.1109/TCST.2004.843131
Reed, K.B., Peshkin, M.A.: Physical collaboration of human-human and human-robot teams. IEEE Trans. Haptics 1(2), 108–120 (2008). doi:10.1109/TOH.2008.13
Stefanov, N., Peer, A., Buss, M.: Role determination in human-human interaction. In: WHC ’09: Proceedings of the World Haptics 2009—Third Joint EuroHaptics conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 51–56. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2009). doi:10.1109/WHC.2009.4810846
Groten, R., Feth, D., Peer, A., Buss, M.: Shared decision making in a collaborative task with reciprocal haptic feedback—an efficiency-analysis. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 1834–1839 (2010). doi:10.1109/ROBOT.2010.5509906
Groten, R., Feth, D., Klatzky, R., Peer, A., Buss, M.: Efficiency analysis in a collaborative task with reciprocal haptic feedback. In: IROS’09: Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Piscataway, NJ, USA, pp. 461–466. IEEE Press, New York (2009)
Evrard, P., Kheddar, A.: Homotopy switching model for dyad haptic interaction in physical collaborative tasks. In: WHC ’09: Proceedings of the World Haptics 2009—Third Joint EuroHaptics conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 45–50. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2009). doi:10.1109/WHC.2009.4810879
Oguz, S.O., Kucukyilmaz, A., Sezgin, T.M., Basdogan, C.: Haptic negotiation and role exchange for collaboration in virtual environments. In: IEEE Haptics Symposium, pp. 371–378 (2010). doi:10.1109/HAPTIC.2010.5444628
Kucukyilmaz, A., Sezgin, T.M., Basdogan, C.: Conveying intentions through haptics in human-computer collaboration. In: IEEE World Haptics Conference, pp. 421–426 (2011). doi:10.1109/WHC.2011.5945523
Oguz, S.O., Sezgin, T.M., Basdogan, C.: Supporting negotiation behavior in haptics-enabled human-computer interfaces. IEEE Trans. Haptics (2011, in review)
Basdogan, C., Ho, C.-H., Srinivasan, M.A., Slater, M.: An experimental study on the role of touch in shared virtual environments. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 7(4), 443–460 (2000). doi:10.1145/365058.365082
Dorf, R.C., Bishop, R.H.: Modern Control Systems. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River (2000). ISBN:0130306606
Ekman, P.: Basic emotions. In: Dalgleish, T., Power, M.J. (eds.) Handbook of Cognition and Emotion, pp. 45–60. Wiley, New York (1999)
Shell, G.: Bargaining for Advantage: Negotiation Strategies for Reasonable People. Penguin Books, New York (1999)
Guttman, R.H., Maes, P.: Cooperative Vs. Competitive multi-agent negotiations in retail electronic commerce. In: Klusch, M., Weiss, G. (eds.) Cooperative Information Agents II Learning, Mobility and Electronic Commerce for Information Discovery on the Internet. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 1435, pp. 135–147. Springer, Berlin (1998)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag London Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kucukyilmaz, A., Oguz, S.O., Sezgin, T.M., Basdogan, C. (2012). Improving Human-Computer Cooperation Through Haptic Role Exchange and Negotiation. In: Peer, A., Giachritsis, C. (eds) Immersive Multimodal Interactive Presence. Springer Series on Touch and Haptic Systems. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2754-3_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2754-3_13
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-2753-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-2754-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)