Skip to main content

Skills and Training Course in Robotic Laparoscopic Urology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Training Courses of Urological Laparoscopy

Abstract

Yesterday’s humor is today’s reality. Robotic surgery provides the minimal invasiveness of laparoscopy with better precision, more freedom of motion, and lack of tremor. The initial step of training protocol for proficiency and credentialing in robot-assisted surgery would be skills on operating the robot in labs and then progressing onto mastery of procedure-specific nuances. Proctoring and preceptoring are two different but indispensible approaches to converting the laboratory and simulation expertise into operative ability. The training of the support team including the theater staff and first assistant is another important aspect of achieving proficiency and optimal outcomes in robotic urology. Ethical issues and cost factors limit the widespread use of robots in the training program.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Zorn KC, Gautam G, Shalhav AL, et al. Training, credentialing, proctoring and medicolegal risks of robotic urological surgery: recommendations of the society of urologic robotic surgeons. J Urol. 2009;182:1126–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ahlering TE, Skarecky D, Lee D, et al. Successful transfer of open surgical skills to a laparoscopic environment using a robotic interface: initial experience with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2003;170:1738–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Vickers AJ, Bianco FJ, Serio AM, et al. The surgical learning curve for prostate cancer control after radical prostatectomy. JNCI. 2007;99:1171.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Link RE, Bhayani SB, Kavoussi LR. A prospective comparison of robotic and laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Ann Surg. 2006;243:486–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. The Chamberlain Group Product Overview | Reproductive & Urological | Robotic [Internet]. [cited 2010 Aug 11];Available from: http://www.thecgroup.com/cat39/Reproductive-Urological/Robotic.html

  6. Seixas-Mikelus SA, Kesavadas T, Srimathveeravalli G, et al. Face validation of a novel robotic surgical simulator. Urology. 2010;76:357–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Westwood JD, Hoffman HM, Mogel GT, et al. Medicine meets virtual reality 16: parallel, combinatorial, convergent : NextMed by design. IOS Press. (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nicholson Center for Surgical Advancement | Global Robotics Institute at Florida Hospital [Internet]. http://www.globalroboticsinstitute.com/en/urology-robotic-prostatectomy/nicholson-center

  9. McDougall EM, Corica FA, Chou DS, et al. Short-term impact of a robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy ‘mini-residency’ experience on postgraduate urologists’ practice patterns. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg. 2006;2:70–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zorn KC, Wille MA, Thong AE, et al. Continued improvement of perioperative, pathological and continence outcomes during 700 robot-assisted radical prostatectomies. Can J Urol. 2009;16:4742.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Zorn KC, Orvieto MA, Gong EM, et al. Robotic radical prostatectomy learning curve of a fellowship-trained laparoscopic surgeon. J Endourol. 2007;21:441–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rocco B, Lorusso A, Coelho RF, et al. Building a robotic program. Scand J Surg. 2009;98:72–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hayat MJ, Howlader N, Reichman ME, et al. Cancer statistics, trends, and multiple primary cancer analyses from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. Oncologist. 2007;12:20–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Binder J, Kramer W. Robotically-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2001;87:408–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lin VC, Coughlin G, Savamedi S, et al. Modified transverse plication for bladder neck reconstruction during robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2009;104:878–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ficarra V, Cavalleri S, Novara G, et al. Evidence from robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a systematic review. Eur Urol. 2007;51:45–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vipul R. Patel M.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sivaraman, A., Coelho, R.F., Chauhan, S., Palmer, K.J., Patel, V.R. (2012). Skills and Training Course in Robotic Laparoscopic Urology. In: Sun, Y., Smith, A., Yang, B. (eds) The Training Courses of Urological Laparoscopy. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2723-9_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2723-9_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-2722-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-2723-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics