Design Representations

  • Gráinne Conole
Part of the Explorations in the Learning Sciences, Instructional Systems and Performance Technologies book series (LSIS, volume 4)


This chapter describes the range of ways in which learning interventions can be visualised and represented, along with a discussion of the benefits of each of these and how they can be used as part of both the design process and as a means of making the inherent design of a learning activity explicit. These include the follow representations: textual, content map, course map view, pedagogy profile, task swimlane view, learning outcomes map, course dimensions view and principle/pedagogy matrix.


Emotional Regulation Learning Activity Learning Outcome Paced Breathing Learning Pathway 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Alexander, C. (1977). Pattern languages. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., & Silverstein, M. (1977). A pattern language: Towns, buildings, construction (Vol. 2). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Biggs, J. (1999). Teaching for quality learning at university. Buckingham: Society for Research in Higher Education, Open University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bruner, J. (2003). The narrative construction of reality. In M. Mateas & P. Sengers (Eds.), Narrative intelligence (pp. vii, 340). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.Google Scholar
  5. Buckingham Shum, S., & Okada, A. (2007). Knowledge mapping for open sensemaking communities, researching open content in education – OpenLearn 2007. Milton Keynes: The Open University.Google Scholar
  6. Buckingham Shum, S., & Okada, A. (2008). Knowledge cartography for controversies: The Iraq debate. In A. Okada, S. Buckingham Shum, & T. Sherborne (Eds.), Knowledge cartography – Software tools and mapping techniques. London: Springer.Google Scholar
  7. Conole, G. (2008a, July). New schemas for mapping pedagogies and technologies. Ariadne Article. Accessed 21 Sept 2011.
  8. Conole, G. (2008b). Capturing practice, the role of mediating artefacts in learning design. In L. Lockyer, S. Bennett, S. Agostinhi, & B. Harper (Eds.), Handbook of learning designs and learning objects. Hersey: IGI Global.Google Scholar
  9. Conole, G. (2009). Capturing and representing practice. In A. Tait, M. Vidal, U. Bernath, & A. Szucs (Eds.), Distance and E-learning in transition: Learning innovation, technology and social challenges. London: Wiley.Google Scholar
  10. Conole, G. (2010). An overview of design representations, paper in a symposium – Conole, G., & Retalis, S. (2010, May 3–4). Symposium organisers – Current challenges in learning design and pedagogical patterns research, Networked Learning Conference, Aalborg, Denmark.Google Scholar
  11. Conole, G., & Mulholland, P. (2007). Using the concepts of design and narrative, The Personal Inquiry (PI) project (Working paper two). Milton Keynes: The Open University.Google Scholar
  12. Conole, G., & Oliver, M. (1998). A pedagogical framework for embedding CandIT into the curriculum. ALT-J, 6(2), 4–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Conole, G., Dyke, M., Oliver, M., & Seale, J. (2004). Mapping pedagogy and tools for effective learning design. Computers in Education, 43(1–2), 17–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Conole, G., Brasher, A., Cross, S., Weller, M., Clark, P., & White, J. (2008). Visualising learning design to foster and support good practice and creativity. Educational Media International, 54(3), 177–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Conole, G., McAndrew, P., & Dimitriadis, Y. (2010). The role of CSCL pedagogical patterns as mediating artefacts for repurposing Open Educational Resources. In F. Pozzi & D. Persico (Eds.), Techniques for fostering collaboration in online learning communities: Theoretical and practical perspectives. Hershey: IGI Global.Google Scholar
  16. Dalziel, J. (2003, December 7–10). Implementing learning design: The Learning Activity Management System (LAMS). Paper presented at the ASCILITE 2003, Adelaide.Google Scholar
  17. Dalziel, J. (2007). Building communities of designers. In H. Beetham & R. Sharpe (Eds.), Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age: Designing and delivering e-learning (pp. 193–206). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Dimitriadis, Y., McAndrew, P., Conole, G., & Makriyannis, E. (2009, December 6–9). New design approaches to repurposing Open Educational Resources for collaborative learning using mediating artefacts. ASCILITE Conference, Auckland.Google Scholar
  19. Goodyear, P. (2005). Educational design and networked learning: Patterns, pattern languages and design practice. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 21(1), 82–101.Google Scholar
  20. Goodyear, P., & Retails, S. (2010). Technology-enhanced learning: Design patterns and pattern languages. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  21. Hernández, D., Asensio, J. I., & Dimitriadis, Y. A. (2005). Computational representation of collaborative learning flow patterns using IMS learning design. Educational Technology and Society, 8, 75–89.Google Scholar
  22. Hernández-Leo, D., Villasclaras-Fernández, E. D., Ascensio-Pérez, J., Dimitriadis, I., Jorrín-Abellán, I. M., Ruiz-Requies, I., & Rubia-Avi, B. (2006). COLLAGE: A collaborative learning design editor based on patterns. Educational Technology and Society, 9(1), 58–71.Google Scholar
  23. Laurillard, D. (2002). Rethinking university teaching: A conversational framework for the effective use of learning technologies (2nd ed.). London: RoutledgeFalmer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McKim, R. H. (1980). Thinking visually: A strategy manual for problem solving. Belmont: Lifetime learning publications.Google Scholar
  25. Media Advisor. (n.d.). Media Advisor available to download from Accessed 11 Aug 2011.
  26. Nicol, D. (2009). Assessment for learner self-regulation: Enhancing achievement in the first year using learning technologies. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(3).Google Scholar
  27. Paquette, G. (2004). Instructional engineering for learning objects repositories networks. In Proceedings of International Conference on Computer Aided Learning in Engineering Education (CALIE 04), Grenoble, France. Accessed online on 5 May 2005 at: Accessed 11 Aug 2011.
  28. Paquette, G., Léonard, M., & Lundgren-Cayrol, K. (2008). The MOT+ visual language for knowledge-based instructional design. In L. Botturi & S. T. Stubbs (Eds.), Handbook of visual languages for instruction design: Theories and practices (pp. 133–154). Hershey: Information Science Reference.Google Scholar
  29. Sherborne, T. (2008). Mapping the curriculum: How concept maps can improve the effectiveness of course development. In A. Okada, S. Buckingham Shum, & T. Sherborne (Eds.), Knowledge cartography – Software tools and mapping techniques. London: Springer.Google Scholar
  30. Stubbs, S. T., & Gibbons, A. S. (2008). The power of design drawing in the other design fields. In L. Botturi & T. Stubbs (Eds.), Handbook of visual languages for instructional design. Theories and practices. Hersey: IGI Global.Google Scholar
  31. Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gráinne Conole
    • 1
  1. 1.Beyond Distance Research AllianceUniversity of LeicesterLeicesterUK

Personalised recommendations